Jump to content

ustio

Members
  • Posts

    280
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ustio

  1. Read the whole paragraph. Anyway in IL2 solution is the camera travels forward ahead of the plane looking back l so you are looking the plane from the front where the sound hasn't reach the camera yet
  2. Just to be clear, I dont have health condition. The title was just a half jokingly clickbait title. Its just annoying to get jumpscare when you just want to chill playing flightsim. This isn't Tarkov you shouldn't feel this way IMO since you pretty much dont hear anything IRL after you die. Getting your heart racing when merging with someone good in BFM is fine. Alternatively, other solution like just having the volume mute for a couple of seconds after you die and then slowly goes up again would be a good fix
  3. Everytime your pilot gets killed, you instantly switch to exterior view greeted with the sound of loud explosion and everything else. This makes DCS as a horror game. Specially when you are not aware. Yes i know Skill issues getting killed first, but you cant not die forever. So it would be helpful if you die you dont get teleported to exterior view rather stay in cockpit but make it that you cant click things like when you die flying helicopter. Or have it as an option for those who prefer to keep DCS as a Horror game Cheers
  4. so in this thread . it explain that the smokewinder is too heavy. however i went a bit further to test all of the wingtip payload. the testing method is simple. have an F-5 with a single asymmetrical wingtip loaded with smokewinder as a baseline and see how the aircraft would react without touching the controls. and then compare it to other wingtip payload. as you can see with the track below, it seems the aircraft react the same way(in terms of roll rate) as the smokewinder when loaded with asymmetrical pylon for every loadout which brings to the conclusion that all of the wingtip payload weight are incorrect. now if i were to guess, in the original thread, it was found that they input the wrong weight of 200 Kg instead of 92kg, I believe this is a unit error that they assume they put 200 pounds instead of kilo smokewinder.trk 9b.trk 9p.trk 9p5.trk ACMIpodtrk.trk catm.trk
  5. Well i was refering IFF by VIDing the type of aircraft since again like you said, Pilot can't IFF so TCS os the next best thing My experience is a bit longer than 2 seconds. But even tho it was 2 seconds its still crucial. I got killed many times because idk what im locking with frindlies arounds.
  6. Yeah unfortunate. Problem is the Pilot only has the TCS to VID and IFF a locked target. Jester unfortunately is very unreliable on IFFing. I wish jester automatically switch out from TCS everytime I change my HSD to TCS
  7. So when the Jester use TCS, the front seat cant use its preventing me from IFFing. Is there a way to make him not use TCS?
  8. I hope they add the C maybe as pay (down)upgrade since it saw a lot of action from Vietnam to Iran-Iraq, Falklands all the way to war on terror. I might skip this until they add the C
  9. its not just the smoke pod. carrying any missile asymmetrically on the wing tip will cause it to unstable roll. it wasnt like this before
  10. Not RPing. If they want RPing they can do that with the current Hornet by not turning on the system. But in MP, you cant disable JHMCS. It gives you a good SA doing while you are cranking in BVR. And also The JHMCS ground designatiin is pretty strong
  11. I understand that Mig-29 is canceled or on hold due to current events. I wonder if F/A-18A possible since most of the 3rd party module that are coming out sets in the Cold War. And there isn't any good red plane set any way to counter any modern blue aircraft. It also would help the MP scheme for a pre 1990 scenario. Currently the F-18 is difficult to balance because it has a capability that cannot be disable. JHMCS is one of them making it tricky to balance them. Also funny enough, I think when the F/A-18 was first release during EA, it was more closer to the A than C in terms of capability. With that said i would definitely go for a (down?)upgrade price like what you did with BS3 and A-10II
  12. will you guys consider this again? Razbam is making an F-15I exterior model for the just for the Israeli skin. and besides I dont mind if its unrealistic since you guys are making BS3
  13. This is probably just me. I wouldn't mind if you guys just make the system to full fidelity but still using FC3 sensors with reduce price that is. It would be fun to be able to finaly learn the Mig-29 system and learn the full start up procedure.
  14. You know, I know that HIP multicrew is probably long way away. But I wish we can have multicrew for the door gunner first instead of waiting for the cockpit multicrew.
  15. is it me or does it seems the HUD brightness is a bit dimmed now? difficult to see in the early morning flight
  16. First of all apologies, I dont know if its ED or you guys that handle weapon so im gonna post it here so you guys are aware. Currently the RB-24 still behave like the old AIM-9B where the missile start tracking way to late Here is the original threa explaining the bug and also includes the documentation And here is the track file rb24.trk
  17. a While ago the Aim-9B was fixed because the activation time was wrong. it seems the RB-24 (which is a licensed copy of the AIM-9B) from HB Viggen module still behave like the old AIM-9B here the old AIM-9B thread here is the RB-24 track rb24.trk
  18. the 1991 VF-31 skin that was mentioned on the previous patchnote isn't in this patchnote and in the game yet. Is the skin canceled?
  19. some server have roadbase. however if they are damage, they cant be repaired. so this option is a good work around so the roadbase can be use again
  20. Is it has to be FAA license? My country license is only FAA CAT 2
  21. so after the 30 seconds dialog, you have to fire gun next to him to trigger the next one
  22. +1 on the 2 seater. It seems everyone always look down on a 2 seater version without seeing the potential. We had a lot of new player that just recently got DCS but are reluctant to join in a mission or play together in a public server because they are not comfortable enough. While if there is a 2 seat version he/she can just seat in the back and enjoy the experience while also learning. For example i was flying with a new guy on enigma server in an L-39 he didn't do anything other than help spotting and we had a blast You can't do that in a F-14, apache, Hind because you are required to know how to operate the RIO/Gunner seat which why I'm excited about F-15E since everything can be done from the front. Granted you wont be as effective as having a competent WSO but atleast he get the taste of what DCS mission is.
×
×
  • Create New...