EcceHomo

The APG-73 is an improved version of the APG-65 with dual-channel single-pulse reception and pulse compression. Will these be introduced into the game? Will the DCS APG-73 be the first Frequency—agile radar (automatic or manual）？ APG-65 can choose different chan（av8bb-TAC-000）.EHSI will also display L&S for radar tracking. thank

The F-18C Inlet Duct Door did not move. Reference below “The electrically operated inlet duct doors (one for each inlet) automatically open at Mach 1.33 (accelerating) and close at Mach 1.23 (decelerating). The doors are controlled by the flight control computer.”

No, there is very little chance of TAMMAC appearing in the game.

Prior to TAMMAC, the Navy used the ASQ-196. Its function is very limited. At the same time, TAWS uses Digital Terrain Elevation Data (which is part of TAMMAC), so there is a problem with the TAWS response in the game. If the ED's F-18C is the so-called "new" LOT20 (without any upgrades), then there should be no JHMCS. After the TAMMAC upgrade, upgrade JHMCS.

LOT20 is a purchase batch. The aircraft will be upgraded after the service, so there is JHMCS in the game. According to information, TAMMAC is far ahead of JHMCS and MIDS on the F-18C/D. Appear in the game, depending on the production team.

This is an introduction to understanding the purpose of mobile maps. The figure below will illustrate some of the issues. I hope TAMMAC can appear in the F-18C. For example, TAWS, DMS and SA all require TAMMAC. PS:All materials are non-confidential academic papers. This is not a manual for military purposes.

Now the ALR-67V in the game is not linked with INS. In maneuver, the accuracy of angle measurement is very poor. It's hard to imagine why an ALR-67V should be implemented instead of ALR-67(V)2.

To fight together and win on the modern battlefield, tactical air, land, and sea forces need an effective command, control, and communications (C3) system. Technological improvements in enemy jamming and electronic collection and exploitation seriously challenge the effectiveness of friendly tactical communications. With the development and fielding of SINCGARS-operative radios, the capabilities of sophisticated, complex enemy jammers have to a great extent been neutralized. The worldwide operational need for a very high frequency-frequency modulation (VHF-FM) radio resistant to electronic attack (EA) is mandated by the requirement that Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Combat Air Forces be capable of performing multiservice air, land, and sea operations in any theater. Such a capability is necessary to ensure successful combat operations. SINCGARS radios, with their single-channel and jam resistant features, provide interoperable communications between surface and airborne command and control assets. SINCGARS is replacing most of the existing tactical VHF-FM radios in the Department of Defense (DOD) inventory. This publication standardizes procedures for the multiservice operation of SINCGARS. It addresses both physical and electronic interservice transfer of SINCGARS electronic protection (EP) information and communications security (COMSEC) keys necessary for jam resistant and secure operations. This publication, developed in conjunction with the contractors of the SINCGARS equipment, will enhance equipment and procedural interoperability. This publication provides the approved TRADOC, MCCDC, Navy and Combat Air Forces multiservice SINCGARS communication procedures. It also provides procedures to effect interservice communications and enhance friendly operations in an electronic warfare (EW) environment. For airborne users, the Navy will use the AN/ARC-210 radio and an MS-DOS PC or Tactical Air Mission Planning System (TAMPS) that will run the ARC-210 Fill Program (AFP). Navy shipboard SINCGARS will use the Army version of the SINCGARS has always existed in the game, but we can't really use them. radio and will also use RBECS. AFP allows the operator tocreate ARC-210 load sets by entering single channel data, entering Have Quick data, and importing SINCGARS data in the form of an RBECS loadset files. SINCGARS has always existed in the game, but we can't really use them. Will f-18c change this situation? This allows data to be passed through SINCGARS even if there is no VMF. thanks

ASQ-213 HTS，BRU-57,SDB I,EGBU-12/GBU-49,AGM-154B,AGM-158,GBU-54,more and more

There are indeed problems. For example, "A pitch bobble occurs during speedbrake extension/retraction especially during high speed flight. There is a slight tendency to over control pitch during speed brake operation in tight formation at high speed (over 400 knots). The aircraft exhibits a moderate transonic pitch up when Decelerating rapidly through the Mach 1.0 to 0.95 while maintaining a high load factor. This pitch up seldom is more than a 11⁄2 g increment in load factor. This transonic pitch up is not noticeable during 1 g deceleration or slow deceleration at high load factors." These can't be reproduced in the game.

This is the operation of F-18C loading digital map.

F-18E upgraded TAMMAC in 2001

Threat charts need TAMMAC support, otherwise there is no way to display digital maps similar to ABRIS threat symbols. TAMMAC uses AMU to load to MC.

SA should not have the ability to input route points or other coordinates, but should be able to use HSI information or TAMMAC information for editing.The focus should be on TAMMAC

Your picture is from 《Integration of Tactical Imagery in the F/A-18 Super Hornet 》 Of course, my picture comes from an AGM-154 paper. No SA data for F-18C have been found at present.

Finally found the image of SA:lol:

F-22 has AN/AAR-56

TAMMAC Conference Information: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3831981_The_tactical_aircraft_moving_map_capability_TAMMAC It already exists in the handbook in 2008.

The HSI chart has three displays. Controlled Image Base (CIB) can display ground friendly, threat targets, threat distances, and other radar and threat symbols (EWP on the AV-8B, see below). F-18C： 1. Chart (CHRT) mode provides a plan-view color map derived from Compressed ARC Digitized Raster Graphics (CADRG). This chart product replaces the Compressed Aeronautical Chart (CAC) map data currently used in the existing map (AN/ASQ-196 ). 2. Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) mode provides a plan-view, panchromatic (gray scale), Terrain plot with slope shading. 3. Controlled Image Base (CIB) mode provides a plan-view panchromatic image derived from a variety of mission planning, command, control, communications, and intelligence systems. So can the DCS F-18C use these three maps? If this is a secret, can you make a similar page and put it in the ED way to the F-18C. The A-10C TDH threat display has been removed. I don't want this situation to appear again in the F-18C.

F-18e has an/aar-57. Before 2008, the F-18C did not have AAR-57.

I would very much like to see HB F-111. Although the performance is small, its value should be higher than A-6 and F-14.

The LBG without the data bus can only rely on the ground to set the laser code, and the VER appearing in the video may be the BRU-33 without the data bus, so I have doubts. If it is a BRU-55, then everything can be explained, because the BRU-55 exists in MIL-STD-1760. Although the old LGB still has no data interface, this is a problem.

Correctly, the F-18E BLK I has been partially upgraded to BLK II's AMC&D, and the radar is still APG-73 V2, but MC is not AYK-14V. Try something like VRS F-18E.

In addition to the data bus and ground settings, I have not seen any other way to change the laser PRF.

I watched the new f-18c release LGB video, which showed the operation of changing the laser CODE. However, in the TAC-300 of 2001, GBU-12 needed to set the PRF on the bomb. In LWS all LGBs set CODE on the ground, but GBU-24G/B has MIL-STD-1760. So how does LGB without data bus change CODE?