213

it looks cool. it probably doesn't happen in the air because your canopy's down. open it up and see if it still behaves that way. edit: nvm, it looks like a bug.

why support ubisoft in their endeavor to ruin everything they touch? they won't get a penny from me.

stop recommending take on. it sucks. and he obviously wants dcs quality/complexity.

place friendly ai units within observation distance of target so that it can relay the position of enemy to mlrs battery.

all recent nvidia cards use pci-e. you need to be more specific.

the f-15 isn't a flying wing. if it is, anything that has a wing can be called a flying wing. this is why being specific matters.

the axis commands relate to vehicle controls, not camera controls.

the .exe doesn't work on 32bit operating systems.

rest in pieces.

if i want to conform the pilot to the ka 50 cockpit, i'll need a reference. especialy for hand placement on joystick and throttle.

there's a few arguments for the motions, head turning, arm movement corresponding to throttle and joystick movement. also, i'm going to add animated night vision goggle and a helmet mounted sight. the pilot itself will require changes as well, but the proposed base model(su25 pilot) is a very good fit and i'll enjoy upgrading it to dcs world standard.

but by then technology will be good enough to keep the nevada looking like the nevada

dear ed, i'm about to get 3dsmax and am learning how to use edm tool. please send me the model of ka-50's cockpit and the model of su-25's pilot and i will make the new ka-50 pilot for you. best regards, very exciting times! :fear:

the game only uses 2 cores, that's just a fact.

what are the relevant files to be modded?

once he's older he can just buy the nevada

sure, once people start writing guides for it. as of now, people just want to keep it a secret so(in the view of one member), only the "1337" people get to mod. i think there's a more practical reason. they just don't enjoy writing tutorials. i think someone will eventually do it. after i get 3dsmax, and figure out how to mod, i might do it.

unfortunately useless without tutorial

the game crashes with more than 100 units in the game, so i'm quite doubtful of a dynamic campaign. as far as i know, there has been no official announcement of an intention to do dynamic campaign.

"The only reason, why i buy A-10 is the info about developing a DC" sorry to rain on your parade, but there are no plans to develop a dc.

the terrain mesh of nevada is more detailed because it's smaller and presumably will use tessellation, though they could have bypassed this constraint with terrain lod chunks as well.

it's glowing slightly

if you don't trust forum posts, why are you asking for answers on a forum? there's a difference between credibility in terms of fact and in terms of writing a research paper. is that what you're trying to do? if you're just replying to a casual question, i think you can exercise some judgment as to what constitutes a credible source without getting academic.

the counter argument to that might be that fsx has a better weather model, better civilian traffic modeling, a contiguous global terrain, among other things i'm sure. what i mean to say dcs still has some distance to go before reigning supreme.

tell him he doesn't know what he's talking about and smack him on the back of the head for me. :)