Gunslinger22

Sums up what half of the community is like currently...

This no longer works.

I've had no such issues, especially on the 104th, with 10 Harriers flying at the same time? Seems there is something else at play here.

Yes. I'm also just a fan of supporting ED, because there development costs for things like the Hornet and the map are extremely high for our very niche market.

We need to be realistic, we're not going to get a Russian fighter that is post 70's. Razbam already tried with there MiG-23, but ED didn't give them the green light. I would love to see more Redfor aircraft, but it's just not going to happen. That said I think the Intruder would be perfect, that way we would have a perfect 1990's CVW.

+1 For not bothering with the D, I'm extremely content with the A+B. I'd rather there limited resources to be used creating the beloved Intruder!

Looking forward to finally being able to test my skins!

I'm currently working now on fictional skins for squadrons such as VF-111, VF-21, VF-32, VF-84, VF-151, VF-92.

Guess the squadron!

I don't think the Persian Gulf map and NTTR are really comparable. If you're wondering why nobody flies on the NTTR, it is because of how limited it is with possible missions. Plus the setting never feels right for any operation that is outside of the training realm. Whereas the Persian Gulf map is ripe for possible missions, both historical and fictional. Its timeframe can span from the 80's to present time. It's the perfect home for the Hornet, Tomcat, F-5, MiG-29, MiG-21, etc... I think it will compete very well with the Caucasus. Especially since many of us love CV operations, to which the Persian Gulf is currently the only realistic option for that.

My VFA-15 Commemorative Scheme is pretty much ready, simply waiting for the 30th to test! It will be released shortly after.

Moonlight is back and it looks fantastic, once the town/airfield lighting is tweaked it couldn't get any better!

I'm for the Intruder!!

Still on my 2.5 Honeymoon months later! :lol:

Me also, I love the cockpit of the A/B, I personally don't like the HUD on the D. I think you loose some visibility that the A/B has with the HUD being projected straight onto the front glass with no combiners blocking vision. I can't wait to tame the TF-30, flying to its limits takes a lot of skill. Whereas with the D, because of the advancements made with its avionics, it doesn't require the same amount of time and training as the A/B.

Well I'll be definitely purchasing the map, while yes, primarily for MP, I will use it extensively in SP. Though usually I only use SP for training to hone my skills for MP. Until we get a Dynamic Campaign, I see MP being the future for DCS. I think with SRS really starting to build it's user base on servers. I'm flying a lot more with people whom want to coordinate rather than turing the server into a free for all.

This is what I also think. I'm also thinking that by making the D, the by far definitive Tomcat, wouldn't it make the A/B redundant effectively? But maybe I'm not looking at it in the right light. But I just don't see the point of the extra time it would take to give us the D, when we are already getting the venerable B? Especially when, as you mentioned, it's time that would be taken away from another module?

Some stormy night refueling :lol:

This is spot on, couldn't agree more with you! :megalol:

Incredible depth to this simulation, it leaves me humbled to see how much more there is beneath its photorealistic aluminium flesh!

I think the technical documents required for the APG-71 might be very scarce. I think we should just be happy with the A/B for the meantime. I think once they're done with that they should move on to other aircraft. But I'm completely on the side of Sirius with we should simply just let Heatblur finish the A/B first!

Night Ops! :pilotfly: