

Pasquale1986
Members-
Posts
487 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Pasquale1986
-
Jabber's Youtube Tutorials and Other DCS Related Content
Pasquale1986 replied to Jabbers_'s topic in General Tutorials
Yup! Me too -
Nice one. Maybe a bomber module would be a nice possibility to start giving ECM mechanics some love then. Thanks for the clarification Art-J :thumbup:
-
I hope that will change since Silver Dragon lists Vietnam Era as "planned"
-
Whats interesting is Silver Dragon's Roadmap-Thread regarding the F-16 und the F-15: Just to clarify: I cut out some stuff within the quote to just show the relevant data. According to Silver Dragon, ED is already working on the F-16C and the F-15E is marked as planned by Razbam. Cheers :music_whistling:
-
Awesome MikeMikeJuliet and many thanks for the heads up :thumbup: That might be a precedent - the one way or the other. The project looks promising but very ambitious as well - hope the guys succeed
-
According to Silver Dragon AI and model updates as well as the addition of new AI bombers is planned: I think it would be nice - especially in 70's up scenarios - if the heavies could be player controlled and the development of such a module would be a good opertunity to take on the AI as well since interaction is needed in the most single player missions anyway :) Other than that i agree
-
Hey probad, why are the current ECM-mechanics limiting the possibility of flyable heavies? Cheers
-
Hey everyone, i would really love to see the possibility to fly some heavy bombers in DCS especially the B-52H or the B-1B and the TU-22M. I don't know if that would be possible with the DCS engine but i would assume ist is since we got the BUFF for example as an AI ingame and multicrew is on the horizon. I think it would be a really nice addition to the Sim and would fill a big hole in the Line Up. So why not do something completely new and give us DCS: B-52H :pilotfly: Cheers
-
Very Cool! Many thanks!
-
Worried CH Products
Pasquale1986 replied to iVVChewy9141VVi's topic in PC Hardware and Related Software
Hey Chewie here are my 2 Cents: I own the Warthog an I have absolutely no problems at all. It's super accurate and feels amazing. But as stated by lasvideo and JetwasH, there are issues with TM-Products all across there range and i have to admit, that i prepared myself to send it back and get a refund if i would encounter any problems from the get go. I have the impression that the majority of the Warthog users are happy and don't have issues, but at this price point...everybody has to decide if he takes a chance :joystick: My experience with the CH-Products on the other hand is, that they are very well build and are really made to last to industrial/professional standards. I bought the Warthog just because i fly the A-10 predominantly. Regarding the feel and use with other modules with the warthog i can say that it feels great on any modern aircraft since it's basically the same Stick they use in the F-16 C/D. I use it with the M2K as well as the F5-E and the F-16 (in an not to be mentioned Sim - please ED give us DCS-Viper so i can uninstall it :D) with a lot of joy and it feels as good as it possibly can without FFB I suggest to also have a look at the guys over at VKB - they offer very nice sticks too and there full metal base is compatible with the Warthog stick so you can eliminate the number one issue with the Warthog - the plastic interior. Many here in the forums praise the VKB stuff. Cheers -
The Quitting of screwing around was just announced on Facebook :D
-
According to Facebook we will very soon find out :D
-
If you guys are experiencing problems trimming out the modules i suggest reading the following post and attached articles: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3191755&postcount=10 Gives a little bit of insight Regarding the F-5 i can only confirm the positiv statements. It's just a ton of fun especially coupled with NTTR and the ACM and BFM Campaigns. Previously i was flying the A-10C exclusively, but the F-5 quickly hooked me for A2A. Cheers
-
That would be absolutely amazing and suitable for lots of scenarios starting in the 70's right up to today :thumbup:
-
That is amazing Baltic! I am definetely in for every M2K Campaign in Nevada and everywhere else :thumbup: I would love to see the Mirage in a Campaign in Nellis in an Agressor Sqn. role :pilotfly:
-
Thanks for the brilliant insights!
-
Thanks for the clarification QuiGon! Forget everything i wrote The reasoning is understandable (sadly) regarding like every M2K thread in the Forum that contains the words "Flight model" or "Radar" or "PCA" Grüße aus Kölle
-
CV and CVN Ordnance Operations IAW CV NATOPS
Pasquale1986 replied to Scooternutz's topic in DCS: F/A-18C
That with animated deck crew and VR will have a negative impact on marriages: Where is your husband? In that dark room down there - haven't seen him for days… -
Couldn't have said it any better :D
-
This is not completely true. I would love to see the F-16 from Razbam for one simple reason: Cpt. Smiley, who does the FM stuff for the Mirage, did - as far as i know - some in depth stuff with an F-16 FM. So the knowledge at least regarding the flight model is there. And - since Razbam is in dev with the Harrier with Belsimtec out for the F-18, Hind and the Phantom for quite some time - they are perfectly suited for the asm work required for an Block 50/52 or 40/42 F-16 IMHO
-
It's summer. I think everyone is simply enjoying their holidays
-
I think the F-16 would make sense because in the end it is similar to the F/A-18C but still a different aircraft and it's in use by a lot of countries. Our current problem in regards of scenario and mission design is the lack of DCS-level Russian aircraft. Most of us fear that, because of the legal restrictions that apply to russian companies in regards of publishing a high fedelity modules of russian military aircraft, we will not see a Flanker or a Fulcrum soon. So why not take the most used possible and plausibel A2A adversary, which would be the F-16 if am not missing something. F-14 is in dev for an iranien scenario, Harrier is in dev, too. If on the other hand we would be able to get hands on a DCS Mig-29 i would be all in from the get go
-
Aloha, hierzu ist zu sagen, dass das PFM der SU-33 schon im Code drin ist. Einige Jungs haben das durch einen entsprechenden Mod auch schon umgesetzt: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=146703&page=23 Wird auch fleissig mit SiThSpAwN und BIGNEWY diskutiert. Schönen Restarbeitstag an alle ;-)