Jump to content

Recoil16

ED Beta Testers
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1294

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Community Answers

7

See answers

3 Followers

About Recoil16

  • Birthday September 3

Personal Information

  • Location
    Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. chromium

    Hi Recoil,

    I'm currently thinking to create some mission on the germany CW map, and I see some excerpt from bases information of 1990 (i.e.

    ). Can I ask you if you can share a link of this docs, if possible? 

    thanks in advance.

  2. Recoil16
    Already requested to be changed to 108.95, thanks.
  3. Recoil16
    Already reported, thanks.
  4. Recoil16
    I do not anticipate that being an issue.
  5. Recoil16
    Right, 107.7 is an invalid frequency for an ILS. This regression is reported.
  6. Recoil16
    Already reported.
  7. Recoil16
    Already reported.
  8. Recoil16
    previously reported
  9. Recoil16
    Already reported, thank you
  10. Recoil16
    The latest domestic AIP can always be found here: https://www.gov.il/he/Departments/Guides/aip?chapterIndex=1 The link in question says "פמ"ת בקובץ יחיד - הורדה" ("PMT in a single file - download", according to Google Translate). That being said, the current direct link to the PDF is here: https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/guide/aip/he/aip_Full PAMAT 3-23.pdf
  11. Recoil16
    Just to be clear, while this will "fix" it in the sense that you can then use the TACAN, the problem is not actually with the Hatzerim TACAN. It is confirmed to be on 96X by Israeli Air Force documentation. It's rather the Wadi Al Jandali TACAN that is either on the incorrect channel, or (in my opinion more likely) it should not exist at all, as there is no antenna visible on real world satellite images where the Wadi TACAN is placed in game. So yes, while this is an interim "fix" you can do for yourself in the moment, this should not be the long term solution to be implemented for the map as a whole.
  12. Recoil16
    Yeah, as pointed out by Ahmed, this is not a bug, rather it is expected behavior that has (finally) been implemented after it was missing for so long. The DME component of a TACAN beacon is functionally the same as the DME component of a VOR/DME. @BIGNEWY I think we can close this as "correct as is".
  13. Recoil16
    An excellent point actually. DMS coordinates without decimal seconds as given here are only accurate to about 30 meters (in latitude, with longitude precision differing depending on the latitude but let's not get into that right now), which is 100ft as you say.
  14. Recoil16
    It's an easy way to show to the devs exactly how, where, and under what circumstances damage is occurring, which is presumably why Flappie is asking for it. A coordinate - while it points out the bump - doesn't do that.
  15. Recoil16
    Previously reported internally
×
×
  • Create New...