motoadve

Might be user error, but I am trying to add some P51s to a mission, I select them, add their waypoints, save it and when the mission starts they are not there. This is a quick mission that I modify the weather, and added some German planes (which worked and appear in the mission) but cannot add the P51s

All metal and realistic feel. $450 plus shipping.

Tried to assign an axis to the repeater compass , but moves way too fast and not accurate. Is there a solution for this? Only way to make it work properly is with the mouse.

Why not showing the comparison here? if it is an unbiased honest comparison.

No VR Necksafer

Yes that is the view when I re center VR

For some reason today, this is my default VR cockpit view in the P51. Is there a way to get my cockpit view back?

SCG Simulated Combat Group, most of the time German side.

Exactly , this is why I re installed it, just for TAW with my squad.

I re installed IL2 today, have the same feeling as you about DCS WWII, simply as the wrong map for the airplane setup. A Germany map will solve the problem, also agree with you about PTO, makes no sense at all , instead of a Hellcat and Corsair , P38 or and an earlier 109 would have made a lot more sense to move in the right direction. Unfortunately I hate the Il2 arcade damage model, where you get killed with the very first bullet even when flying bombers. Some things I appreciate in IL2, VR cockpit limits, going thru clouds, is more realistic (rain and darkness)oil on windshield, turbulence, and wind up higher, not every flight is smooth as glass, pilot modelling is much better. DCS makes fantastic airplanes, its a shame about the rest, and definitely not attracting people, seems like they don't care at all.

Anyone have the MFG pedals? After calibration and firmware update, right rudder is pressed in full in DCS, in MFG configurator tool shows centered. Any ideas?

Does this mod still works?

In reality is about game play, if you just want to dogfight over P trap, without MW50 you are at a disadvantage big time, because of the massive low alt dogfights, if you want to fly tactically with a wingman, doing escorts, attacking bombers, patrol other areas, follow the plan and objectives, then not having MW50 is fine, I think PO was made for that kind of game play, which is great, the problem is most people don't care about mission objectives and go to P trap for a dogfight. If the people in charge of PO somehow can make for the players to commit to the mission objectives , it would make for a much better game play and MW50 argument would not be a thing, there should be a way to make this happen, I know registering for an objective has helped, maybe this could be enforced before taking off?

Installed, but I am stuck on this screen. What should I do? null

Please make one for WWII , its sorely needed, thanks.

Please NO, warbirds are super simple, it would make them boring, IL2 has a ton of simple WWII planes, if that is what you would like.

Rhino FFB

Its the VPC MongoosT-50CM grip.

Please we need redout modelling in the pilots, right now we can do some very unrealistic flying in warbirds and they look like paper airplanes, doing aerobatics, and the pilot gets away with this.

Struts definitely feel like they need some more nitrogen in them. Too mushy when taxing the airplane. Brakes are sensitive too.

For some reason my brake lever in the Virpil is not recognized as an axis.

Simshaker works when testing but does not work in game anymore, nothing was changed on my end, any ideas? nullnull

Thanks for checking this out, I like it more how it is now, IMHO is more realistic with the sudden blackout, what we need later on is having a fatigued model of the pilot if he pulls many Gs time after time in a short period, also negative Gs needs to be modelled, I think this is a move is the right direction.

I like the new G lock much better, thank you, you cannot game the game as much as before, plenty of grey out time before a blackout, its sudden, after grey out, which is more realistic, its good. Good to hear about G lock warm up, but what about G lock fatiguing the pilot out after a few times of repeated G locks, its reversed, pilot should fatigue and grey out earlier, when tired, hope this gets implemented. Also negative Gs don't seem to affect the current pilot.

Is it possible to decrease the value in the file the brake values are stored?