Jump to content

ams999

Members
  • Posts

    536
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ams999

  1. When you look at it in the model viewer, what do you see? That is what I consider 'right'. I consider something done to a skin that you see in game but not in model viewer as pretty useless.
  2. Concerning mounted on the ground or on a plane I don't really see a problem as showcased in this video of the GAU-12/U used in a gun pod on an AV-8A. From the video: - on a fixed mount on the ground: design specification 5 mil, achieved 3 mil - on the airplane: design specification 7 mil, achieved 5 mil This shows that a) the ground and plane mounted accuracy doesn't deviate by much even when fired from a moving aircraft (and this is pod mounted, not mounted inside the fuselage with better center of gravity concerning recoil) b) a gatling gun is very well capable of being *more* accurate than design specification So I would expect the same (i.e. not a lot of difference) for the M-61, too.
  3. Apparently they still are:
  4. I found this
  5. Will this trickle down to the Dora?
  6. I definitely had this one, too (med flight profile and skimming). The Harpoon then tried turning 180° but crashed into the sea.
  7. Thank you for fixing this!
  8. Must have looked past that. Anyway, the [Civilian] Standard is called "Olive drab" in the description.lua (which is the relevant entry for the name shown in the ME), maybe check again.
  9. A Little Bird/MELB would be fantastic!
  10. Check in /SavedGames/DCS/Liveries/uh-1h/ if you find such a skin there.
  11. Whatever the cause of that infamous accident, the Italians effectively killed aerobatic shows in Germany. Everything since then have been very tame displays, nothing like in the 70s and 80s. In the UK the air shows were still better but also tamed down over time...
  12. Huh? What? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning
  13. Just please please please spare me the UCP abomination! :cry: Either go OCP/Multicam or stick with M81/Woodland which still is authorized for select units. Or go MARPAT.
  14. Doesn't pass IC, unfortunately.
  15. Just came here to ask exactly that :megalol:
  16. Wow that was quick, thank you very much!! Glad that the video could help you.
  17. If you're talking about the desert scheme then yes please! :thumbup:
  18. Hi Bananimal and thank you for these great skins! I'm especially interested in the 30th anniversary F-18 and I've noticed two things you maybe could consider: 1. One blue/gold stripe extends to the canopy frame which in the template (*1.dds) is located at the left border next to the inverted/upside-down '164630'. I think the canopy frame ought to be completely white. 2. It looks to me like the 30th anniversary bird uses the standard roundel with red stripe, not a completely blue one. Also, the blue of the roundel looks like the standard blue (which is slightly darker than the blue of the livery). This may also be the case for the text (Navy/Marines) but I can't definitively tell. Thanks again!
  19. Whistle! Whistle! Jehova! Jehova! :megalol:
  20. Mmmmmmmh, strudeln...
  21. See post #62 for my guess.
  22. I think your point 1 is the same as in this thread: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=243975 I never had the launch into the air, however.
  23. The anticipation of the Chinese market did.
  24. The fix for the cockpit shadows made it in today - thank you PC!
  25. Don't use VR but tested now anyway and JHMCS works from cold start both from carrier or airfield. Could you try a non-standard start-up by only turning on JHMCS and then start one engine (doesn't matter which)? I just tested that and it works with either engine (or start one engine and then turn on JHMCS). Don't touch anything else. Have you tried different HMD render settings in the special tab (left/right/both eyes)?
×
×
  • Create New...