FoxAlfa

I understand that the current focus is on Hornet and Viper, but can some of the limitation stared to be added to them also instead of just capabilities? Currently Hornet has one ping TWS picture and DL donation, no launch delay, perfect RWR that can tell apart 2 fighters in close formation 80nm away, Viper can go 127 kts (240kmh) over its design limit with no problems and has twice the radar range and power, AMRAAM has instant pick up, Sparow can guide of memory mode... I know people keep asking for capabilities and I love the Hornet and Viper to bits, but in my opinion it's the limitation that make compelling and good simulation.

I guess no new news or an estimate on when to expect CFD rework and standardization of modelling of all the A-to-A missiles?

Since it is TP mode I would say it is heat mark from the fighter ahead to the right. But maybe@Fighter29 can help you here?

Yes, most probably the symbol will trigger... but not a spike... radar can range out of SNP/TWS... it is not entering STT or DNP

Well longer times you were referring are not the norm, but an exception (new popup jamming target 120degress from where you were looking). Most lock will happen below 3sec. And the section you are referring list all times but doesn't go into details how they are achieved... the appendix does list why longer times are needed for Jamming targets. the bottom line we all would love a Full Fidelty Fulcrum so we could really go into these details, till then, unfortunately FC3 is quite limited in such details.

Well get to the end of it, 'dopune' section first since you are probably referring on VTU - 01. VTUP.001/01.0... The pickup times take 2-3 s depended on the position of the radar... longer times need to build up firing solution >7sec and ranging errors are for jamming targets... also keep in mind that that manual is referring to an export 9.12b with slower processor then let say 9.13s... EO times are correct and depended on multiple aspects... bottom line FC3 radars and EOS are quite simple and don't collate the real ones on many aspects but the range limitations are for sure under spec.

The section you are referring is times for engaging jamming targets

It shouldn't since it is not a constant illumination... RWR are much less accurate in real life that modelled in DCS...

Since currently Aim120 in DCS picks target in lookdown tail chase at ~15-19km with 70 times smaller antenna area and much less powerful emitter... so ether Sukhoi is underpowered, or Aim120 is overpowered.... or probably both...

Excellent news!!! Really looking forward to it! Quick question, which version supports SAHR missiles?

Thank you for the Info!

When will we get an option to remove pylons on the Flanker family?

12. Chaff and Flares should be able to be loaded in 20 packets instead of 30. True system is more complex, and works is different ways but forcing 30 or nothing is needlessly gimping the MiG-29

Sparrow LOFT... silly me :music_whistling:

When will the sparrow LOFT profile be tweaked on the F-15? Now it is using it bellow 13nm, which is quite ineffective...

Yes, it should. 3m target was measured since Manual and Documentation are based on 3m targets....

Да, цели 3м, JF-17... Су27 или f-15 с подвесками следует смотреть дальше

сообщена ошибка

Excellent, selectable option then?

I can confirm I have same issue of DCS not starting after latest openbeta, unpluging the Thrustmaster T-150on start resolved it

Is it possible to add vibration or sound on button press for better input feedback?

Even early 90's MiG-29M would be great.... 9 paylons, better T/W then A, Much better radar, DL.... OG M was tone down made into SMT....

Ok, thank you for the information. It is much apricated. I really hope that one day you are allowed to do a proper Red module so more attention can be paid to those updates.

Is there any new information on when can we expect CFDs and updates of the R-27 and R-77? Thanks in advance

Antenna is antenna, transmission power is transmission power... it theory is should work prefect... in practice... not so much :) I did crunch some numbers 'on the back of the envelope stuff' with all the same reserves as GGTharos... the range it is main factor, but keep in mind there is ~24 times antenna surface area difference between F-20 antenna and Aim120... using marketing numbers of the F-20, reducing size antenna area, I came up with 7,5 nm range in lookdown against the hot target, but keep in this is with all the power and cooling of the full fighter radar, something Aim120 doesn't have....