Jump to content

Schnarre Aggro

Members
  • Posts

    508
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Schnarre Aggro

  1. little late, but i had the same issue with the 818 truck and artillerie. i waited for like 20min and no reloading occured .... any news on this topic ?
  2. thats what i was curios about ... and if there is only 3 degree stickdeflection in reallife ... in dcs it is 0 degrees ;) i am able to roll at high speeds"750ish" but veeeeery slow - fine with me, got used to it BUT the stick in the 109k4 doesnt show ANY deflection... afaik if there is aileron authority, it should be seen on the stick in cockpit, shouldnt it ? .... maybe just a visual thing though :joystick:
  3. If i read the "attached graph" correct, it says "Konstanter knüppelausschlag"(constant stickdeflection) of 7.5degrees at around 750kph .... wait ... did they actually move the stick at 750kph ??? if so , then we have a serious problem.... at750kph the stick in the K4 doesnt move AT ALL... how is that supposed to be ? maybe yoyo can actually explain that ?
  4. @saburo ... ist that the ILS freq ??? ...shouldnt it be the Freq of the Tower/atc ? ... i guess that would increase the range as well. ( i have just a vague imagination concerning frequencies and ranges of this "radiostuff" ... feel free to correct me)
  5. Afaik you just die right away(death without warningsigns)in the 109...has been some patches back though
  6. I think one should control oxigen, but to turn it on on startup sound a little "over the top" to me .... Due to limited oxigen, i recon that they turn it on at a certain altitude....we probably need some clarification from RL pilots and theire SOPs concearning oxigenuse.
  7. anybody actually thought about it, beeing an advantage to have a wall to lean against if one has to push at sth ?? i mean really guys ... plain physics ... 1. take a bodyscales, push it agains the wall(standing freely) - note the weight 2. put your back against the wall - push again - note the weight 3. think about it only read if you can take water beeing poured in boiling oil well, thats just the physical laws ... if you want to really measure the difference, then sit between two walls, equally wide as a 109pit, recreate the the above explained experiment ... I just couldnt hold back after so many posts with knowledge from other guys/sources That i had to come up with an answer everybody can easily verify for himself. Please guys ... dont quote me on that, dont argue with me(in this case with physics) ... just think about it and let it sack I really dont want to step on anyones foot, i just wonder why nobody thought on that :music_whistling: one should never underestimate german engineers ;)
  8. hahaha nice one ... cost me 2 aircraft to figure that out :music_whistling:
  9. i have the same issue with the new patchversion. as far as i see it, its a matter of "clean flying" ... means - keep the ball centred. sometimes and in certain flightattitudes you even have to "over-rudder" a little to stay "on rails" and be able to get the shot. take these advices from a somewhat "slightly above average" 109driver :pilotfly:
  10. i experienced wingdrop only if i used flaps ... no wingstall without flaps ... i will try what manowar said(no stall at 200km/h) asap... if thats the case - i stop playing until fixed! (i had the same with the c101 ... i didnt fly the plane since then ... its a no-go IMHO)
  11. can we close the thread ? I think the "bugreport" was the goal of this thread and therefore it can be closed :D
  12. @solty ... not the right topic for rollrate discussions ... ill send you a pm
  13. hahaha no, you do not want at the moment ;) the AoA of planes are not synced .... planes shoot 20 degrees below your plane and do still hit ;) from the attackers position he for sure does pull lead... its just not visual for yourself :smartass:
  14. i saw a lot of what darkraiderss is saying. no slats wobbly at lower speeds wingdrop over left wing when stalling in slowturns MUCH better rollrate at average and higher speed much better energie flying( it doesnt bleed off speed as fast as before) way better responsiveness on the pitch axis less effective flaps while turning better turning at slowspeed WITHOUT flaps I didnt do any test - but ive logged "some" hours on the 109 and that was what "I feel that changed" poor ponies ... in my opinion the 109 is the factor 1.25 deadlier than before .... no more getting away with fast scissors :gun_rifle:
  15. hey emolina ... great thing youre doing there ... can it made to create MP missions as well ? I personally see "flying alone" kinda "boring"
  16. hello there ... i want to sign up as "=STP= Schnarre" for the "krauts" in a Bf109-K4 (preferably with the flarepistol) oh ... i want to add that i will probably stream this event ... english/german
  17. did you think of providing a "DCS Simple Radio Server" ?
  18. I guess every dogfighting pilot in MP has experienced the same issue. Me for myself , try to keep guys away from my six to avoid that frustration .... doesnt work all the time.:joystick: But IT IS a huge gamebreaker for the WW2 scenario ... thouhg ... come on guys be honest ... we will all Stay/comeback ! There isnt anything(except maybe BMS) wich comes close to DCS. therefore we should try to help them as good as possible, which would be to feed them with tracks. I encourage all of you MP Aces to post tracks on which it is clearly seen what disturbes us .... I still ( after this 7 years) have faith in ED ... it WILL work .... im retired in about 30years ^^, and THEN i have a lot of time to enjoy all the georgous things they will invent until then :smartass:
  19. The purpose of this thread was, to tell ED about some serious problems for the Guys flying MP. We have confirmation from Nirvi (I think mods will not lie nor presume) so we just have to sit back and wait for ED to fix it . Please dont complain about "theire way of doing things" in this thread .... helps nobody remember: its done when its done :smartass: instead - keep posting tracks or videos which show the issue.(like Nirvi recommended) kepp it nice and constructive :wub:
  20. Thx Nirvi, that was all i need to know :thumbup: (@Tracks uploading .... all of my tracks are like bigger than 50Mb ... MP tracks ;) ) edit: tried it anyway tu upload a track .... gave me some issue "...security token..." blabla ...i guess 104Mb is too much
  21. maybe you should link this thread here in your thread ... I read the title and thought "nahhhh i dont care about wingtip vortices - im not reading it ..." ;)
  22. Very nice analisys. Gotta try that as soon as i have the chance to "use the aircraft again after landing" :) I had the same problems (since many versions ago) and thought it was a bug, so i took a new plane(had holes in it anyway). But i definately gonna try this! Finally i may stay on the acg-server for a complete evening in only one plane. I never had this before. Thanks andy ! (triedto give rep but it wont let me)
  23. Can i/we please get a confirmation from the mods/devs that ED acknowledged this "problem" ?
×
×
  • Create New...