Jump to content

_Digby_

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by _Digby_

  1. Good news, now we just need someone to announce that they have taken on the project!
  2. Wow, amazing! Fantastic find; thank you so much!
  3. What steps did you take to completely wipe any traces of the throttle from your system? Fresh install?
  4. Pretty negligible difference then; the added FOV being better than the added clarity of 4K. Also, 4K 144 Hz G-Sync / FreeSync2 will cost an arm and a leg but is relatively affordable at 1440p UW. Benchmarks would be cool to see! The 6800 XT looks like the way forwards then; good to hear they sorted the drivers compared to the 5700 XT! Ah yes, I was looking at that one too! Looks to be very good value with all the features. How readable are MFDs / spotting? Does FreeSync2 work well?
  5. Thanks for this, I am also in making this decision. I want to be able to see the ball more clearly when rolling out in the groove, as well as seeing instruments with less need to zoom in. I'm guessing 4K would be best for this? How is the 6800 XT treating you? I'm very tempted myself, but worried about AMD drivers etc. Digby
  6. In the year of the 30th anniversary of Op GRANBY, this would be amazing news! Want a Tonka so bad!
  7. The method in post #9 does indeed work, thanks Rudel! P.S If anyone is struggling, make sure you are using the name 'FA-18C_hornet' and not 'FA-18C Lot 20'.
  8. Nifty feature, but please make it optional; I like the challenge of actually using the real ball!
  9. Same boat as you RackMonkey, probably going to get the Sapphire Nitro 5700XT to replace an ageing 970.
  10. Will there be native support for voice attack or another program similar to it? I am very much looking forward to the increased realism provided with CATC, but dread the idea of trying to hit F1 to "call the ball" when I'm already task saturated enough working the groove.
  11. Ok cool, thanks for clarifying! :thumbup:
  12. Hello fellow Hornet drivers, Like many of you, I have recently been dropping lots of JDAMs onto unsuspecting targets using my shiny new Litening pod. However, the asymmetry created when dropping these payloads has prompted me to retrim the aircraft (using the aileron trim function). This works perfectly well and once I have expended all of my bombs, I then manually retrim again for straight and level flight. However, this process has prompted a few of questions with regards to how the Hornet's FCS responds to manual input/requests: 1. Should I have to keep retrimming the aircraft's roll axis (to account for changes in airspeed), if I have trimmed manually in the past to account for a particular loadout/cg? For example, when I'm just messing around or practicing traps (with a symmetrical config), I never normally need to account for any kind of rolling moment. So once I have dropped my ordnance (returning to a symmetrical loadout) why do I need to continue retrimming? From my point of view, it is as if the FCS needs to be "reset", as to automatically resume trimming my ailerons for me. 2. If my above assumption is true, is there a way to give roll trim authority back to the FCS? 3. Is there a way to better monitor the amount of roll trim induced? I.e. the FCS page shows little to no aileron movement despite considerable roll trim input on the stick. If I am misunderstanding how roll trim works in the Hornet, please correct me. I suspect that my lack of experience with asymmetric loadouts, has led me to believe that the FCS is trimming the ailerons for me (as to cancel any sort of rolling movement) when in fact it is simply the effect of a well balanced aircraft loadout. Digby
  13. Yeah same dude! If the 2080 had shipped with 12GB of VRam then I would have been all for it. The thing is though, I've had my fingers burnt pretty badly with the jump in VRam between Maxwell and Pascal in the past, and am a little hesitant to opt for just 8GB - especially given DCS Multiplayer. :lol: Does anyone who currently owns a Radeon VII play Squad or Post Scriptum - and if so - what's the performance like? I've seen the Radeon VII get a lot of bad rep with X-Plane 11 and OpenGL in general, but it's hardly surprising when the people who are testing it assume that 16GB of VRam means that you can crank everything up to the max. Most notably here with reflections: Laminar has stated there does not exist a consumer computer that is powerful enough to get high fps in all situations with all settings at max. Seems little unfair on AMD. Will wait for a bit more information to surface but it's between the Radeon VII and a 2080 for me.
  14. I saw a thread that Sapphire Nitro are not planning to release a modded Radeon VII and instead are waiting for navi. Will probably pull the trigger on this soon, 3.5 GB of Vram in my 970 is killing me.
  15. Awesome Rudel, will give it a go in the Hornet later!
  16. This would be useful!
  17. Currently still using a 970 and had been set on a 2080. Honestly, if it performs around the same as a 2080FE/OC'd 2070 then the 16GB of vRAM might make me choose the Radeon VII. Would be fantastic if someone on here could test a Radeon VII in a few months when drivers mature, to help me make an informed decision.
×
×
  • Create New...