Jump to content

TaxDollarsAtWork

Members
  • Posts

    751
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TaxDollarsAtWork

  1. Would it be outside of the realm of possibility to see other variants of it as well such as the J-7M or are only 90s and 2000s varaints being considered
  2. Ah ok so your claims are BS until you can prove them. It still doesn't explain why SAMs and airborne radars from that era do not produce the same results from the manual and that is the crux of the issue something you just can't seem to grasp for whatever reason and resort to falsely attributing claims to me.
  3. I already did its in the OP here is another thread that goes more in depth https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=168915 I wonder if you can do the same for your claims
  4. And? So does this mean when literally anything locks it up it should behave like this? No it does not. I am not asking for a good RWR I am asking for an accurate one and what we have simply isn't that.
  5. I would like to ask when if at all the developers will start working to fix the SPO-10 RWR? As seen in this link they've been aware of the bug to some extent for a while right, at least 4 years. https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/view.php?id=51 But they don't seem to do anything about it at all is it that they've possibly forgotten about it. A dev response official or unofficial would be very nice
  6. It doesn't change the fact the SPO-10 is not behaving correctly in game. I wonder why M3 has not mentioned anything about the SPO-10 in this update Do they wish to surprise us at a later date or do they not see anything wrong with its current implementation in game?
  7. I just got it yesterday and I am very pleased with it I hope you are too
  8. Id like to see them address the RWR issue as well
  9. Still no word of an RWR fix? What gives.
  10. I agree as well very iconic skin for the MiG-29
  11. Haha here's hoping I do seems like a fun challenge
  12. That's neat, any figures on the coverage? As for the heaters again only the PL-5Es, right?
  13. I'd like to know will this version of the JF-17 have an HMD and missiles that can use it?
  14. These issues have been fixed on open beta if it helps
  15. I added a track of it if anyone is curious, it feels off but you guys could probably tell the difference. Strongest wind I've ever flown in for sure if thats the case
  16. Hello, trying to fly this campaign is becoming hard when my plane wants to suddenly veer off course for no reason what so ever. I don't know what could be the cause for it, the load is not asymmetrical so what could it be, weather conditions?
  17. And is there an SPO-10 fix anytime soon?
  18. Do I need to re verify my game files or is this a problem for anyone else?
  19. Good to see they are doing something thank you for that
  20. I know the damage done because I have been on both sides have had missiles whack me head on and have fired close enough shots with as I said before not only R-60s but bigger missiles like AIM-9s and R-73s too see the eagle continue fighting as though nothing at all had happened after direct head on hits.
  21. I've one too many a time run into F-15s that just won't go down after a missile hit even head on regardless of missile type, AIM-9s, R-60s what have you. Will ED do anything in coming updates to rectify this issue? Have they acknowledged it?
  22. Hello I had an issue with 2 AI MiG-21Bis set to High with clean stores and no pods, regardless of this they still used flares and chaff. The AI was also being strange and shooting from impossible positions as in The gun would have to be on top of the plane in a movable mount I could not find a way to add the tac view but I did attach a track.
  23. So I take it the Su-27 pack owners will not see a J-11 any time soon?
  24. Maybe submit another one? Might have been lost with the company change
  25. Has it already been reported to LN/M3? I've tried looking at the bug tracker but I didn't find what I was looking for.
×
×
  • Create New...