Insanatrix

I'm trying to get specific forces to retreat after they sustain a certain amount of losses. I know the trigger works because the test message I put in pops up however the triggered hold action doesn't seem to get them moving again. Do I need to specify a stop condition parameter and if so what do I use if I just want it to be triggered and not timed or probability? TIA

Try somewhere in the DCS A-10C\Scripts\Aircrafts\A-10C\Cockpit folder. Maybe the Command_Defs.lua file?

I wasn't much of a helicopter guy but Black Shark blew me away with the fidelity. The same with A-10C. I say get them both they are both very much worth the money.

Odd you should say that one of my friends was driving his Rx-7 down a country road and ended up with a bird in his radiator.... He has a video of it but can't find it as it was years ago.

I agree the Phenom II Architecture is getting pretty old and soon the Bulldozer and Llano's core's will be out in full. If they are any good they might drive the price of the sandy bridge processor's down a little or the price/performance ratio might have you picking up a bulldozer core.

Same I always tend to rotate around 130 knots and wheels leave the ground around 150-170 knots depending on loadout. Sometimes it feels like the wheels are almost stuck to the pavement and they are trying to come "unglued".

Osama was a philosopher and theorist ... Not what killed him. Americans lies just ridiculous. The world laughs. Thats what google translated it to?

Thanks a bunch!

When you first load a mission and unpause you get that FOV "thing" where it kind of zooms out a little bit. I don't care much for the default FOV when you hit Enter and I don't want to have to fiddle with it everytime I load a mission to get it right. Is there a LUA file that contains the arguments for adjusting the amount of FOV that it zooms out to in the beginning? I just want it a little bit closer but not as close as when you reset it to default.

I have a X52 non pro version and it works quite well TBH. I have every HOTAS command mapped as well as some other just from in the game using shift modifiers.

I'm not sure if there is a way to get WP elevation to show on the HUD, if there is it would be somewhere in the IFFCC menu. You always want it to be drawing elevation data from DTS because that gives elevation data to your weapon systems as well.

DTS means that it's drawing elevation data from the Nav System. You would normally use your CDU for finding the elevation of the waypoint.

Not questioning your credibility, rather the credibility of some of these driver sweeper programs. I know not everyone is technically savvy and knows how to clean it out themselves, but some things you need to learn rather than rely on programs to do it for you. Mainly because of the risk you take using said programs.

No kidding about the wide release window. Try toss bombing one from 100-200 ft AGL doing about 360knots. Once it's right over the target it hits an invisible wall :P

It's the SK I think but don't quote me on that cause I don't know much about Russian hardware.

It's not so much the extra work as it is the spyware/rootkits some of that stuff installs without you knowing. 9/10 just uninstalling the drivers using the ATI or NVIDIA uninstaller is enough.

You don't need line of sight to release, like if you were tossing it over a hill for instance. As for them both needing to be on the same side of the target thats a good question. I might test that out tommorrow.

I hope thats a Top Gun reference :P

I understand how it goes, just shooting out idea's.

I noticed actually that after I reinstalled the full 0.7 install my ground textures were quite blurry as well. This was from a patched 0.6 to 0.7 install.

I guess you could technically do both. You eventually do both anyways so why not offer the whole download at the same time as the patch?

It is a nice stick but for all intents and purposes an X52 can function just fine. Comparing it to performance items though is kind of odd.

Lol, Answers within answers. :P

Thats an E-2C not and E-2D. Wags specifically said E-2D which begs the question why would they model it =P

Why would they model an E-2D? =P