wsoul2k

GG and what about the data-link from one air=group to other ?

PLz can someone explain to me if the info posted by Force_feedback about data-link in the Su is correct ...im not talking about data-link with an EWR or AWACS im talking about data-link fron one airgroup of SU to other airgroup

Any comments So an SU-27 airgroup can share information from Another SU airgroup ? Multiple groups can share informaton with other group ?? something like a CAP group can share information they receave with an a strike group behind then ??

Ok now im confused.... Force_feedback found this in the Su-27sk manual So an SU-27 airgroup can share information from Another SU airgroup ? Multiple groups can share informaton with other group ?? something like a CAP group can share information they receave with an a strike group behind then ??

Feliz aniversario Lock On

Thank you for yor fast reply Olerg :D F-15 in lock on have all the MFD modes modeled ?? Well even if the MFD is not clicable the functions of it have to be mapped to the keyboard rigth ?? :cool: ...this is not the diferential factor here Ok ...now i get the point....a new standart of realism is needed rigth now to be classified as a flyable. this mean if the F-15 was not in Lock On as a flyable yet and it have to be done with the info ED have on its FIRST version of Lock On maybe it could be left out of Lock On ?? I mean from the first version of Lock On the Actual Info for the F-18 is Ok but for the new ED standart is is not enougth ? Im Rigth ?? Can you tell me how you will get this info as they are classified ?? or you have to kill me after that ?? :D

I have posted an question some time ago... ED have TAC manual to all flyables in Lockon ? :cool:

Err....Olerg are you there ? :icon_wink just a litle BUMP! Agree....maybe he is reading this post :cool: But im not worried about the AFM...because the GUESS about this is in some way how more LOGICAL :rolleyes: ( ie Aerodinamics ) Im just trying to understand the criteria to choose one flyable.....because if we have to wait to the TAC manuals be avaliable...well the sim comunity dont have a brigth future:) ...this kind of information will be always rare... We will not see any new aircraft in the next 10 or more years....or you think Rafale, JAS, F-15E, Tornado, MK2-c , MK2-5, etc etc will be avalible any time soon :( I know Olerg wanna do flyables more realistic as possible.....but ...if some GUESS work have to be done to make a M2k-5 or a Tornado flyable...well....so let it be......if this is all we can have .....ok lets do it and try guess the best possible ( Janes F-18 ;) ) This is why i wanna know what is NO GO condition...i really beliave the F-15 have a lot of guess work...but i can be wrong....i dont expect to Olerg gimme this kind of info here because a FLAME WAR will start :cool: But one simple question ED have the TAC manual to all flyables in lock on ;) sorry for the poor english and Alfa you can call me Rodrigo...

Olerg...in 1.2 the Ka-50 can use AUTO-ROTATION ??? i mean ....the procedure to land the heli whitout engine power ?? This is modeled ??

IMHO trees will be a problem.....at low at we all wanna bether trees.....we wann get in a hill and hide fly very low and etc etc...i really dont know how do that with a big FPS hit.. About the models i think new LOD levels to ground units will help a lot off course we need new DAMAGE models ... infantry units are desirable..but i dont think we will get then on 1.2 I dont know if this is possible...but this can help a lot to avoid a big hit in performace......can we have dofferent textures based on the choosed flyable ?? I mean with the chopper a bether texture to ground Units and ...we really dont need a higth texture so AIM-120 or whille in a chopper..... Well i reallu dont know ..but something heve to be done PS: After reading my post...i can guarante im not helping ...so i will just be quiet and wait lol :tongue:

Agree....maybe he is reading this post :cool: But im not worried about the AFM...because the GUESS about this is in some way how more LOGICAL :rolleyes: ( ie Aerodinamics ) Im just trying to understand the criteria to choose one flyable.....because if we have to wait to the TAC manuals be avaliable...well the sim comunity dont have a brigth future:) ...this kind of information will be always rare... We will not see any new aircraft in the next 10 or more years....or you think Rafale, JAS, F-15E, Tornado, MK2-c , MK2-5, etc etc will be avalible any time soon :( I know Olerg wanna do flyables more realistic as possible.....but ...if some GUESS work have to be done to make a M2k-5 or a Tornado flyable...well....so let it be......if this is all we can have .....ok lets do it and try guess the best possible ( Janes F-18 ;) ) This is why i wanna know what is NO GO condition...i really beliave the F-15 have a lot of guess work...but i can be wrong....i dont expect to Olerg gimme this kind of info here because a FLAME WAR will start :cool: But one simple question ED have the TAC manual to all flyables in lock on ;) sorry for the poor english and Alfa you can call me Rodrigo...

Amazing...no words...just amazing

Plz ...lets get back to the topic :)

Just to compare Alfa...do you know what they have from the F-15 i mean what info are considered a NO GO and a GO kind information :) but i wanna know only the real info not the guess one something like F-15 1-Radar Modes Have it GO 2-TAC Manual Have it GO 3-ETC ETC ETC Mirage 2000-5 1-Radar Modes Have it GO 2-TAC Manual Dont Have it NO GO 3-ETC ETC ETC Even if the Radar is the RDY ?

That is the point GG lets see F-15 Still classified A-10 Still classified So ...i think even with all the data ED have....still having a lot of GUESS work here.... And i think this guess work was much bigger in the first release of lomac...just see the changes in radar...ECM Missiles...RWR TWS modes etc etc So why not try an Mirage 2000-5 a complete new figther also operated by NATO forces My point is the info avaliable today for the M2K-5 is so poor..to justfy not modeling it ?? the info is so much lower compared to the Initial F-15version modeled in the first version of Lomac ??

I agree...They put a lot of work in this features and will not make all of it from scratch But i have a few questions about the called new projects They will have onlythe f-16 and the mig-29 ?? or Only this two with AFM added ?? because i dont think they will let the others flyables out ( They are already done ) even it will not have the AFM But about including new ones....today the info ED have about the F-15 is enougth to BE REALISTIC ?? i mean all the radar modes ..all performace data... Because i really wanna see something complete new like Mirage2000-5 it is a fantastic figther the information ED have about the RDY radar is much lower compared with the information ED have about F-15 when they start Lomac ?/ cya and sorry for the poor english

man if this machine AMD 4400+ Dualcore, 2gb Dual Channel Pc3200 Corsair XLL DDR Ram 2-2-2-5 1T, Dual XFX 7800GTX's SLI 256mb/512mb, Dual 200gb WDC Raid 0, 160gb Barracuda, 120gb Samsung spinpoint, Audigy 2 ZS, Sony 2xFDD & Memory Stick Reader/Writer, Saitek X45, Dual 12v Rail Enermax 600watt EG701AX Noisetaker cant run lockon Maxed ...i really think we have a problem here.... I really wanna see what kind of hardware is needed to run Lockon MAXED...or it is just IMPOSIBLE to run smooth i mean something in the code... But this kind of info is imposible to get..

No it is not a difficult task BUT itis very hard to do all that and the THING still FLYING and even more dificult make this thing bether of any of its predecessor :cool: One note....lets stop this discussion about nuclear bombs...we all know where this will end the Nuclear era is over....just remember MUTUAL DESTRUCTION assured...this is the balance and Yes im against the non proliferant pact....just for one reason the actual contries that have wont let it go...and this WAS the principle of the pact No more words fromme about this subject...i think it is a sad time to Mankind :(

Any comments of what ED think about this ?? hey Devs..just download the demo...have a very nice airplane crash there on the end of the movie

This is teh GAME version....other version are 8ms tks for your help britgliderpilot

No im not kidding :) I never have an LCD but i really wanna avoid that GHOST efect here are the specs from the Acer® AL1951B 19" TFT LCD, 1280 x 1024 native resolution, 700:1 contrast ratio, 150°/135° horizontal/vertical viewing angles, 2 x 1.5W integrated speakers, VGA and DVI-D connectors, 400 cd/m2 brightness, 6ms response time, silver/black color What im afraid on this oneonly 1280x 1024 and looking forwadi fond this Colors Supported Up to 16.7 million forgetbout 32 bits colours...im rigth ??

The price to LCD monitors is starting to fall But what is the best and ideal respons time avaliable today for a 19' monitor the lower i can find is 6ms

I got your point SK...but i see this PP being used to calculate AFM,COLISION,WEATHER....and from the first versions.....IF you dont have one PP unit...this job wil be perfomed buy the CPU as it was on the firstdays of GPU Your game will run slower of course and in the future ...IF you dont have an PP unit you will not RUN the game any more ....you can run Lockon without graphics Card ?? But i really dont know how long it takes to became obrigatory it wil depend o Indutry/market utilization.... But i still keeping my ayes in future :cool: EDITED: Sorry for my poor english

I have readthat also...butcant find the page any more...whel...they already have an contrac with ASUS...maybe we can have an ONBORD chip :cool:

Sorry i have to desagree with you...the CPU workload to calculate AFM, Colision, Missile FM, Ground Veicles Behavior will be done in the PP (Phisics Processor ) and With this the processor can be used to ather more important tasks ...like RADAR,ECM ,AI :D and the pp can work withother kind of objetcts also see the list below: AGEIA PhysX Processor Architecture has been designed to enable radical acceleration of: * Rigid body dynamics * Universal collision detection * Finite element analysis * Soft body dynamics * Fluid dynamics ( Humm maybe we can have the STORN on water :icon_wink, and some WINDS here ) * Hair simulation * Clothing simulation