wsoul2k

Its is fake...justlook at the tail radar...you can still get a litle of BLUE sky over there

Look in this post you will find some usefull information about turn rate etc... http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=13451 but sometinho i have noticied is the maximun of [ 22.4 ] degrees per second for SU-27 compared to the simhq page where it gets [ 25 ] Maybe in the Jetfire test the SU still having some room to get more speedy same occur with the F-15 or just boot aircrafts have being tunned down in the next path ( if im not wrong simhq page is 1.0 ) really dont know Cya sorry for the poor english

I think the first Lens retain all the heat

It is being made by a friend..but basicaly it is a 15" LCD with lens and pamp but until now very good results at a very low cost sorry dont know what you mean with fresnel :D

My future home mada projector.... Looking good Inside cya

I have this problem also....but for me is the rudder that is not working....the pots for the rudder are also located in the base ??? because im very afraid in dismount the "stick" of the throttle sorry for the poor english

How did you guys pay with visa electron ?? my bank card is visa electron..can i use it ??

I think this capabilities are from CRY engine....but i now with DX10 those are well how can i say DX-10 ORIENTED :) ,,,so those capabilities are more easy handled by the hardware using less GPU power or CPU power well but im not an expert :D

The use of DX10 capabilities can reduce de load to the CPU..bether shadder control etc etc...

Just got this video showing the directx 10 capabilities volumetric clouds softh particles fully destructive anbient etc just folow the Link http://www.gamershell.com/download_12286_preview.shtml question will be the nest project from ED DX 10 compatible ??

:) Dont worry.. sure i wanna compare those monitors....but is preaty hard to find a 20"crt today in Brazil..... yu can easily find a 21" TFT...but anithing higther then a 19 CRT is very hard to find :( But one final question if you can help me at 1280x2024 wich one has bether image ?? TFT or CRT ??

Tks Pilotasso....im no sur...but until now i will go for some TFT...have to choose carefully wich one... any sugestion ??

Hey Junae...im from Brazil also........i live in Sao Bernardo do Campo SP i will buy FC first ...and then i will go for Black shark because the gap betwern the releases....and remenber.....suport the genre :icon_supe add me on msn wsoul@terra.com.br

my point is...should i go for a 20" maybe a 21"crt with higth resolutions ( i.e lower anti aliasing=) or a 19"TFT with fixed resolution soh i have to use a higther ant- aliasing ?? no space problems in my desk......and the prices are near the same

Have to choose...but i really dont know wich one is bether I dont have any space problems in my desk....soh i dont know if i got one 19 LCD ( Low resolution ) more expensive or a 20 CRT... Nay sugestion or comments tks sorry for the poor english.

Yeah yeah.....we have a full box where this one came from :icon_supe But i have only 3 Names to scare all of you Ronaldo Ronaldinho Robinho :icon_supe Sorry but We will see any of you on the finals bye bye

We need that kind of clouds also... and i dont have seen clifs like that in Lock On ..but i really dont know if the real MAP of the region have it But one thing get my eyes on Now here is where it gets REALLY good: If you have TWO processors, or a DUAL core, then the SECOND CPU will load textures while the FIRST CPU runs the simulator! Therefore, you can load scenery and fly at the SAME TIME, really lowering scenery-load pause times. Maybe some day in the next project

I already read your posts D :) But D in this situation if i have 2 robbers i realy dont know how the coop will know witch one he have to get.... If this work this way if i fire an R-27 in 2 closest planes there is no way i can guarantee the missile will hit the Locked target ..because in your words it have to find it for him self... IMHO the chaff is a real big target.....just one more big target but if the iluminating radar can HOLD the lock i really cant see a way to the missiles choose other... Im really confuse rigth now Sorry for the poor english if you have time add me on msn to chat about ok i will really apreciate wsoul1974@hotmail.com

Yellonet there is not such thing like "the missile goes for the chaff" in a SAR missile...the missile goes where the PAINTER tell it to go......if the painter can hold de lock...the missile will be ok it will just ignore the chaff Is something like you are driving your car ....following a hot chick ( target ) in your front....and on your front a ugly girl ( chaff ) just pass trying to fool you...if you (PAINTER) dont turn your car (Missile) the car will continue to folow the hot chick...there is no way the car can choose for himself to folow the ugly girl :D

OK...but in this post I was talking about FDL ( Figther Data-link ) ...in this situation...ME in my SU-27 will be iluminating the target to you...you will receave info in your SU-27 based im my radar contacts... You can be in the "shadowns" all the time in finish the target in a sthealt mode using EOS no need for an AWACS or GCI BUt im no sure about this capability Force_feedback is translating the manual and if big IF this is true this can change the way the Su is flyed

Force can you send the manual to me ?? i have a friend who works in chinese space program and she is Russian..... maybe she can translate the manual to us add me on msn wsoul1974@hotmail.com or send it to my personal e-mail r.f.m@terra.com.br

Yes...Thanks GOYA This is what im trying to confirm ..so ...this dlink capability is real ?? From one airgroup to other ?? if so this can change the way the SU is flyed....because every AIRGROUP in the air became an AWACS sharing the information to other airgroups I already can imagine...lots of ET in the air :icon_wink A lonely SU flying is no more a lonely SU and yes....we know where you are !! :D But mabe we only will see this in the next project

Just to be clear...so this is a real capability of the SU-27..i mean this kind of data-link ( from one air-group to other ) If so ...this is a BIG step back....i already can imagine the possibilities of use of this kind of tatic ...it is very sad it was not implented...the F-15 have the TWS ( in a poor way but it is there ) but lets hope in the future projetc it will be implemented :(

IMHO this is the point..... We have 1 problems here 1-Riple AIM-120...on line most of players fiire at least 3 AIM-120 or 2 AIM-120 and 1 AIM-7 on the same target..I can dodge the first one...some times the second one..but the third always get me ( Low energi etc etc ) Solution: Leave with that or change servers where the riple shots are lower ( more rare every day ) We can stay talking about this an entire month...but if you have 3 Missiles coming to you ...you will enter in defensive and then you are dead... I know we can work with our wingman.....But this will work only if the F-15 dont have one also.....if so your wingman will enter defensive also very soon If the F-15 is alone ..no problem maybe you or your wingman will be dead because of the riple AIM-120..but the chances are much bigger...because your wingman can push on hin and force the F-15 going defensive..even if he fired in tws you or your wingman will reach him And this is a BIG problem .. your only chance is in a 1 vs 1 combat or in a 2(or more) vs 1 (F-15) In a 2(F-15) vs 1 (SU-27 ) tha maximun you will get is a 1 F-15 Down and you Down It is a NO WIN condition... Sorry GG ...this is something i really wanna see :) if i can see a Su-27 pilot evading 8 AIM-120 from a good F-15 pilot i will became his padwan :cool: I think this is a SERVER option.....it is not untrue and it is not complete true..because of the points as GG show few post ago like LOS etc etc... But if the server wanna run it....well deal with it Sorry for the poor english

GG just my 2 cents You mean more options in radio comunication ?? or more info on the radio comunication feedback from the AWACS OK the LOS thing should be fixed or implemented ( Future project ) I have posted some questions about data-link from one airgroup to other as described in the manual ( Read force_feedback post ) if this is a real capacity it should be implemented OK should be removed the gods eye view Can you be more especific ?? im really curious Ok...but we dont have enougth data to compare...how many r-77 have been fired until today ?? I mean....maybe the R-77 is a killer also [:)] Again..to many variables and to many classified data about radar and missiles we will never get the REAL thing....we have to guess the best possible....... fingers crossed to the patch about missiles behavior [:)] cya Sorry for the poor english