Mike_Romeo

Pretty sure he did that so that people stay low so that they can find each other more easily

Soooooooooooon as always... Just be patience

Thats true Deka is already going in that direction and has developed a new radar model that consider the RCS of various aircrafts and the aspect to the Jeffs radar. I would say they are the radar experts in DCS You should have done this before you claim that the RCS of the JF-17 is to low You didnt proofed anything. I used your methode to "compare the RCS" of the JF-17 and the F-117 Edges, canopy and intakes are 100% refelctive. The JF-17 has a RCS 2.5 times greater than the F-117. The F-117 has a front RCS of lets say 0.1^2m which means the JF-17 should have a RCS of 0.25^2m

DCS ground crew members are not ED employees

According to Deka, the RCS should even be smaller. Topic was already discusced here:

The whole airframe is a Faraday cage. Beside that, could you send me please your sources to that topic so that we are one the same level ?

I just want to say that this isnt a very scintific way to messure RCS. You could make the nose area smaller or bigger as you want and I dont see why you why you marked the whole canopy area of the JF-17 but not of the F-16 or why you marked the top of the JF-17 tail bigger than the one of the F-16. Beside that there are much more factors like material which influence the RCS. I would say you see what you just want to see

MiG-29A = basic variant MiG-29G = MiG-29A but with german livery and imperial units instead of metric MiG-29S = Able to carry R-77 fox 3 missiles, inbuilt ECM suit, improved flight controll systems allowing you to pull 2° aoa more and slightly more fuel (120kg round about) MiG-29A is more used for dogfights because its lighter and more manoeuvrable. For everthing else the S is used more.

All air to air missiles are going to be reworked.

And you do indeed clearly hear the word Phantom

A F-4 Phantom is already in development and will come "quite soon"

Over the past year, our primary ATC focus has been on the Supercarrier. Now that the Supercarrier ATC system is nearing completion, we will next move on to airfield ATC radio communications. Given the scope of DCS World, this is not a simple task, and it will require three separate ATC systems: Western Modern Day, Eastern Modern Day, and World War II. Because this effort will require a large amount of new radio voice overs, we will also take this opportunity to update the radio communications for other entities like flight members, other flights, AWACS, tankers, etc. This will continue to be developed in 2021, but we do not have an estimated release date.

+1

Read this:

Google pay added as payment option for the E-Shop

Für die Standalone Version, im Installationsordner im config Ordner sollte eine datei mit dem Namen "lang.cfg" sein. Einfach öffnen, alles löschen und durch "EN" ersetzten. Datei speicher, DCS starten und schon sollte alles in Englisch sein.

Here you go

Of what ? The R-27 report, the russian interview or the translation of the interview ?

The charts are showing it current state after the updates but there are fine tuning comming in the future which maybe will slightly nerf them. Its from the russian interview

They already have been. There are a few more fine adjustments comming which may slighly decrease its performance. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/upload/medialibrary/bda/xnncgbqcdftgat1awbmcegln17yf2c8m/R-27_Missile_Family.pdf

From the Su-25T manual

If you can, use the targeting pod. You can search with the targeting pod targets, designate one and slave the missile seeker towards the target you selected from greater distances and different angels which makes it much easier. How excatly to do that is described in the Chucks JF-17 guide on page 241.

Planned but not a easy task

If you want something authentic, then nothing will beat this: https://www.bugeyetech.com/ah-64

Radar is now slightly nerfed but overall still pretty good.