ALDEGA

Elaborate why it is a heavy loss ... An RQ-170 is not the most high tech UAV, is it? How will Iran use it to defeat western forces in a hypothetical conflict. It's barely worth using as propaganda.

Is that a theme park?

IIRC = if I recall correctly :D edit: shinobi'ed

If you don't see the flashing red triangle you can also change the TAD view so you can pan the map independent of your aircraft position. (china hat forward short IIRC) You can also use zoom in this mode.

HiJack, try Alexrey's track.

Interesting ...

That switch does not influence signal reception. When ILS is enabled (as you did in your track) and set the correct frequency you should be able to hear it. I don't know why I doesn't work in you track, it worked in clean mission.

The localizer bars may not work as they should but when you select STOW you will not see the yellow localizer bars anyway. If they are ever fixed then ABLE will need to be selected :P

Hmm, I couldn't tune to Senaki (108.90) in your track (no ILS tone, no marker beacons), but was able to tune into Batumi at 110.30 ... I created a test mission and was able to tune into Senaki though ... By the way you need to set to set ADI localizer bar switch to ABLE (it's set to STOW in your track which prevents the yellow bars from being shown)

A track is always helpful.

Nate, the picture you linked is not working for me.

Korea.

Dynamic lights have a noticeable impact on performance so try the trick in the previous post.

Don't underestimate such power lines ... they're not exactly light, thin or weak.

Obviously priorities need to be made and stuck too. We're not asking ED to drop what they're working on and handle this request ASAP, we're voicing our opinion about something which we'd like to see changed ... at some point in the future. We can't and don't expect ED to make an official statement regarding every single request or if/when they would implement a change. However, it would be nice to be able to discuss an idea without being met with consistently negative feedback. Official feedback is welcome of course, if ED desires it so.

1. I didn't ask for the use of AFM or SAFM for AI aircraft. I mentioned "parameter tweaks" for "AI FM". Don't change my words. Bluepilot76 understood what I said. 2. If simplified AFM (SAFM) were that detrimental to performance then why did ED include it for helicopters in DCS? Please read EvilBivol's post once more. I wouldn't be surprised if SAFM were added in DCS for fixed wing aircraft in the future. By the way, I could swear some of the (auto)replies in these forums are scripted. :D

Well, it seems the helicopters in DCS use a simplified version of AFM. AI airplanes are probably still using "SFM".

Why are you so quick to ridicule his request? Some parameter tweaks could probably improve the AI-FM ... It's a genuine issue.

This is not the DCS:BS forum :D

I meant legible in a flight sim like DCS. Often such small text is difficult to read without "zooming" in, even with "high" resolution (1920x1200) on a 24" screen. Real Life™ has much better resolution :D

Doesn't look like DCS ...

Hmm, flying the Ka-50 into random objects near an airbase yields interesting results ...

Hmm, rotors are blown off before ejection ...

4GB demo?

You may want to update that title: iOS devices may also include this stuff (in addition to Apple's secret location tracking...) http://iphoneblogr.com/tag/awd_ice3/ By the way, not all Android devices have this software. Mine doesn't ... (purchased independently of a carrier)