192nd_Erdem

What a waste, I'd love to see Ka-50 in production instead. Howewer, "the best" doesn't always win as we see :)

Also, check that you may be messing with autopilot. The plane usually goes out of control if you accidentally hit autopilot and try to fly it at the same time. Other than that, it seems me like a stick centering issue. Nothing some deadzone wouldn't fix :)

Good morning sweetheart, good morning :)

Thanks, great video :) I especially liked the diverse music selection, I don't know some of them though. Couldn't see the used songs in credits as well.

Wow, quite interesting to know that.

Oh, I once made a movie about that "Where Eagles fly?" matter . . . poor Eagles :/

Please, let this thread die.

It's very noticable and shouldn't be a good thing for a helicopter supposedly be "better" than Apache :)

YES It could bring tear to my eyes if I saw one of my Vikhrs go insane and detonate prematurely :)

I think the reps are imported back from the LO forums, that's why. Not that I care about this little e-penor thingie though.

When it's delayed again?

Will we get a printed manual with the CD-DVD version?

No communication with combat ground forces? :( Now we miss the fun part.

What's this poll spam around here? Are you that bored, or do you really "love" this community that you want to learn what everybody thinks? D:

This is very old. Dates back to add-on announcement.

Why don't you make one of the teta-testers responsible for website community PR? You don't need to have a full-time paid person to do that :)

Probably. As GG said, those values are for 90 degree test simulations. Also, there's a lack of information there. It says "side", which side? Turret side, hull side or the tracks side? Those parts make huge differences. Turrets are the most armored component of the tanks, and the rest is rather lightly armored and should pose no problem for a Vikhr. Also, considering Vikhr flight path, it'll most probably hit the tank's top(Which is the weakest part of a tank, for example you can take out most of the tanks with an RPG on top of the turret) and hull armor. Should one fail, second will have a much higher chance to take out the tank, or disable it.

F-16 FTW. I really don't care about F-18, F-16 will generate more sales for ED as well. Hornet should be the secondary priority for ED.

Uh? That seems next to impossible. I'd save the time and frustration and get a rudder meanwhile :)

IMO Lock-On engine will be greatly outdated when that fourth "mysterious" aircraft appears. Your best bet for A2A is a completely new simulation from ED, on a new engine. Which I think has some clear 5-6 years to come.

I don't want to, why can't they include it in CD/DVD? If it's 5$ more, make it 5$ more. You're talking like you buy a ED product every month. Don't buy 2 packets of cigarette and save yourself the initial BS frustration :) If they make the manual optional, we'd have to pay much more for it because of the smaller volume.

Yeah, please include a manual in the CD/DVD box this time. I can't be bothered to print that 100+ page manual by myself, and reading the manual from monitor screen is such a pain.

That Su-27 model looks really ugly behind these 3D models. Keep up the great work! Yardırın gayri! :P

I'd rather have my eyes pleased more with both. I can't understand the buddha attitude of some guys here, why don't you want more after 2 years of development? They're just gonna rip LO and strap a well modelled Ka-50 in it with some community made vehicle models and voila, it's a new series. Yeah.

F-16 for more sales for ED. Do I have to tell again why Falcon 4 is such a popular game? I don't give a rat's ass for F/A 18 TBH.