ZQuickSilverZ

Right, I knew you meant in real life. Thanks for the clarification though.

So you can do it in A. How about the Su25T? Any chance of seeing this in FC 3?

So your saying there is no way to get GPS coordinates in an A-10C (I know you said A)? So I could not manually type in GPS coordinates and get a waypoint? (I am not trying to be funny, I seriously do not know. I do not have A-10C.) I thought some of the weapons used GPS. Here is an example. Let's say that the KA-50 had NO datalink. You could still use the PVI-800 to manually put in GPS coordinates and get a WP. That is what I am talking about. I wish we had something like that.

My major gripe about FC 2 was that there was basically no way to share target data or location (beside bullseye). I do not see that being fixed though.

You would need 2 buttons. Shifted they would have 2 commands each for a total of 3 radios and voice control (4 functions). Hope that solves your problem (I don't fly A-10C) Also I highly recommend using a button for voice control. I will give you an example why. I have a command called start aircraft for my KA-50. It starts the helo, sets my autopilot channels, sets my lights, and puts my abris in nav mode. If I say this (or GC THINKS I said this) after take off, guess what, I fall right out of the sky. Extreme example but, you can see how this "always on" could create problems.

Here is a link. http://www.mediafire.com/?3137q4kt4fe2uep If this breaks any kind of copyright law admins just erase this. I am not sure how that works for software. This has not been sold in any form for years and Microsoft has shown no interest in reselling it that I am aware of. You litterly cannot buy this software anymore.

Crunch I agree that you are probably right about the systems part. I was refering more to the possibility of them updating all the aircraft to the advanced flight model that the Su25T uses. I stand by what I said though. How can someone pass judgement on software they have not even seen yet? Thats like people who say X game is going to be great. Then it comes out and is rushed and poorly designed (Duke Nukem comes to mind). I say we wait and see.

Sorry but VAC fails in every way compared to Game Commander 2 The interface is terrible The programs ability to understand what you say fails in comparison Maybe you should consider switching up. Oh and spikenet you can have the same joystick button control TS3 and GC2 with most joystick using the switch function (usually on the pinky switch). So you can use both things and it only takes one button and the location is easy to remember.

That sure is harsh judgement for a product that is not even out yet.

HA HA Hey EtherealN what is that barcode for on your avatar. And by that I mean what product is it tied to?

Touch Your Pit..... That has to be about the worst logo I have EVER heard. Yes. I am very interested. Any chance of seeing this on Nook Color?

Thank you Cali but I needed them for Black Shark 1. As far as I can tell these are for FC2. Are they the same? Also this only included the export.lua. I need the config.lua to.

No the players are all kind of spread around which in my opinion is part of the problem. The best thing to do is this 1. Find a server that is populated 2. Find out what squadron runs that server 3. Visit the squads information page 4. Get the squads TS information The LYNX server requires a TS connection to play on thier server. To me ALL servers should require a TS connection.

Wow. I backed up my files and replaced the stock ones yet I am stll failing checks. Maybe I corrupted them somehow. Can someone PLEASE post the stock export and config files in the Eagle Dynamics/KA50/export folder. I would really appreciate it. Please save me from having to do a full reinstall.

I have horrible news. I just tried to join the 51st server and had an integrity check failure......

Someone want to test this in Vista and Windows 7?

He's a Pie Rat ARRRRRRR. Pirate software then come on their forums for tech support. Thats rich.

I did not really look into JTAC too much honestly when they announced it. Let me see if I have this straight.... they are making it to where a human can play the part of the A.I. vehicles and soldiers? Like an RTS (real time strategy)? If that is so that is......... AWESOME. To me that is MUCH better than a dynamic campaign. If that is not so.... man maybe they should look into it. "Hey, someone got their World In Conflict in my DCS" "Hey, Someone got their DCS in my World in Conflict" How would that conflict with with briefings though?

Anybody know if they ever fixed exporting the abris and shkval. Does it still mess up the screen on muliplayer? If there is a fix how do you do it?

Thank you for that clarification GGTharos.

Well truth be told, in a KA-50 unless you have another jet with RWR tip you off to incoming jets your pretty much in a bad way. Even if they do it is slim that you will survive. Since they can not tell if its friend or foe (and by that I mean Su25T's which is what your most likely going to be flying with).... well you get the picture. I can't very well go run and hide every time a friendly RWR makes a beep. Which brings me to this.... Is FC3 going to model Friend or Foe more? Right now only the F-15 uses it right? I know that the identifier on the BS says no function. Does that mean an F-15 can not tell if a KA-50 is a friend or foe? If DCS is going to make more fast movers they really need to get on that non functioning friend or foe. Does the A-10C have it?

This is a program designed by Mnemonic. This is a link to his origional post http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=906037&postcount=189 I made this post to raise awareness of this great program. This program displays Russian style flight instruments to another monitor. Here is a screenshot Please note all of these instruments were moved and resized to mimic the Su25T layout. Please note you MUST use the new export.lua file to make it compatable with LOFC 2.0. This is tested and QuickSilver approved with Windows XP. Good Easy to Install Works Well Accurate Bad Instruments, though they are VERY accurate, do not always cosmetically reflect the aircraft your flying. Things I wish it had RWR Weapons Ready Display Landing Gear / Flaps / Airbrake Display Autopilot Channels Bugs The ball is in the center when a coordinated turn is being executed does not move. (actually this is not a bug it just does not work in the program... it should) Overall Almost Perfect 9/10 This is also available for DCS Black Shark. http://3dvrm.com/bsvp/

What pitfalls? Can you be more specific?

I agree with you about your view on the population The population does not NEED to be big but, to me, it is preferable. I will also agree it is better to have a "high quality" community that flies with a sense of purpose. As far as the IL2 / DCS comparison, maybe those sims are not as different as you might think, only the style you play them in. IL2 does have multiplayer co-op, most DCS servers have H2H. Choosing to require TS in LYNX really was a good (actually it was great) decision. That by itself makes LYNX a go to server

Yes, Flaming Cliffs 2 (and I will assume 3 as well). I bring up radar because of people using fast movers and shooting down friendly aircraft, They either don't know how to use them or don't know the protocol to not luanch against a spiked friendly (or at least thats how I perceive it). A requirement to use TS like in the LYNX server would go along way to improving this problem. In my opinion this is a good move ALL public servers should require the use of TS.