S77th-GOYA

Read my post again. I didn't say that. You yourself have recently posted about being bored and being drawn to the "Dark side". There was a time when you and I both were online A LOT. And now we're not. When I am online the names I had been used to usually seeing are rarely if ever there. Make your own list of those people. And do not read into my post that everyone who is gone left because of poor software.

Many have in different ways. The majority have simply chosen to stop using ED's product. Several hardcore fans of LOMAC have simply stopped flying online and/or posting on this forum. Some express their dislike for ED's choices and/or facets of ED's product. Some make efforts to improve what we have been sold, although some important things can't be improved upon by the community. Some have nothing but wonderful things to say about ED and all that they do. Personally, I find it difficult to maintain enthusiasm for this game. It has serious shortcomings with systems/weapons modelling and no corrections are in sight. ED chooses to sell us a helo rather than to fix our jets. Testers can talk all day about how amazing the Ka-50 is going to be and it just does nothing for me. If I end up buying BS, I'm sure I'll give the Ka-50 a chance just like I did with the 25T. Although my current interest in the helo is even less than it was for the T, and that was considerably low. Merry Christmas

Hence the "Roughly". :smilewink:

Roughly the same PK as LOMAC. :thumbup:

I get it. Crying wolf?

Only LOMAC can kill LOMAC.

Try turning down the slider in the audio options?

* snicker snicker * http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/751/751000p1.html BTW, the F-22 would stand a chance against the Lerche. :pilotfly:

If there's no det cord around the sun roof, it's for a girlie.

And if I remember correctly, the coder for the mission editor is gone too.

Is one's sister really hot? If so, one should post some pics.

v1 was introduced in the '90s. There are still some vanilla APG-63s in service, however. Probably the biggest upgrade on the vanilla was the PSP which enabled it to be modified to accommodate new modes and weapons through software rather than by hardware.

Can't fly combat.

You need to see Mitch Janssen's A-10 pit then. And yes, I'm referring to a pit for a new flyable. But if it can't be done, oh well.

Sorry, I quoted you on that. :harhar: You mean, by HPRF range, that that is a blind range? Also, if the 120 is active, why hold the lock? It's autonomous, no?

Real or LOMAC?

Did you ever ask him how much work he put into building those missions?

After the Slammer goes active it is autonomous. Meaning it recieves no mid-course updates via datalink. The range at which this happens was the question. I have heard that if fired within WVR, it is truely fire-and-forget. I have also heard BVR described as 20nm or greater. Although one could piece that info together and say that the 120 goes pitbull at 20nm, I prefer to refrain from such leaps in logic. One thing I do feel is certain. 4 AMRAAMS fired at 4 targets in relatively close formation would most likely not end up with 4 splashes. Once they go active, they would likely all lock the same radar return. But then again, they could be "smarter" than I think they are.

When should AMRAAMs go active and no longer need guidance from the launching aircraft?

The theory is nice, but what about the hundreds, if not thousands of variable installations and online compatibility? i.e. #1 - That guy is cheating! #2 - No he isn't. He installed the Captain Sim AMRAAMS. #1 - Dang, I gotta get me those. #2 - No problem, here's a link to the torrent. #1 - Dude, you RAAAWWWKKK!

With the new tools available, does this enable a modder to create a new cockpit or would certain things still be in fixed positions, like radar displays, etc.?

At what range did you fire?

Yep, that's what I thought. Thanks for checking.

In 1.12a, 4.