S77th-GOYA

Oh, OK. It sounded like you were flying them: Zip up a mission file and upload it to the forum here. Use the "Manage Attachments" button in the reply screen.

How are you flying Tomcats and Hornets?

I've never seen that before, maybe it has to do with the mod you're using. But check those planes in the editor for speed at the initial waypoint. And make sure they are set to "from parking area" and not "from runway".

Not sure what you mean. Maybe link to a zipped mission file?

Replace it with the original file. This has happened to me and several others. To my knowledge, a reason why it happens has never been discovered. If it changes back, keep replacing it.

Which missile? Against which plane? AI or human? But a general answer would be to fire if you need to make him busy (don't worry about his energy state, it can be recovered very quickly). Keep pressure on until you can make the kill.

Completely untrue. BS will include two codes? I agree completely. And all of that is completely irrelevent to the discussion. Are you saying ED is incapable of making a sim without a bunch of frustrating bugs, flawed modelling and limitations? They just don't have the manpower to do it right and still release new products to keep solvent? [see the first part of this post.] What you don't seem to get is that people expect to buy a product that has been tested to perform as it should. Software is the only product that expects its customers to buy it off the shelf needing repairs. So yes, people expect bug fixes for free because they are expected to pay their money for a faulty product. They also expect patches that don't create new bugs and unrealistic modelling. WTF? Completely untrue. The life of FC has been months. From what we have been told the support of FC died with 1.12a. Again, you imply that ED cannot support its products to the expectations of its customers with the income the sale of that product generates. And no, I don't like it. But I'm not going to just bend over and try to smile either. It appears there are plenty of others who feel the same.

http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=11293&highlight=lock+payloads+classify

Intel would be the CPU and would not make a difference. Just make sure that your motherboard has the right socket for the Intel chip, the AGP slot, and supports the RAM you're going to use. You might want to do a Google search on the basics of building a PC. Also, if you list the parts you have in mind, we can tell you if everything is compatible.

What was an average ping for a server in Oz?

Try using the CCC. Check for differences with the Catalyst AI. It helps overcast.

Nyquil and quaaludes. It cures what ails ya. :sleep:

The fact that all these flaws and limitations exist is a bad thing. The fact that ED isn't going to fix them is a worse thing. The fact that ED is planning on selling new software based on the same flawed code is the worst thing.

We've already been told that there will be no fixes to the other flyables and the work for 1.2 is concentrated on the helo only. Unless that isn't true, there are people who are upset about the lack of support ED is giving their chosen rides, especially the F-15. Not to mention the myriad other problems with this game as it exists now besides the flyables themselves and the lack of some things that limit what can be accomplished, such as a debrief log so that a dynamic campaign can be implemented. The community is calling for these things and all we hear is, "You're gonna love the shiny new Ka-50". Sit quietly and wait when what we've been told is going to happen is not what we want to happen? Seriously? Now: If by numerous other improvements, you mean shiny new ground vehicles, that is not an improvement where LOMAC needs it. If you mean something else, please elaborate.

GG or anybody, do you think the method you are using to get range on a jammer is realistic? I think I know what you're talking about, and I have my doubts about its realism.

But that doesn't mean ED has to cut ties and support of the software that we have already purchased. The problems that exist, (AI, for example) effect the 25T and will effect the Ka-50 as well. ED is putting their hard work into these new projects and placing them in this flawed environment with flawed flyable aircraft and weapons. So they are selling a developmental work in progress? How long the Ka-50 has been in development is completely irrelevant to the problems that are not being fixed. One might think you reading a different forum if you think people want ED to explain themselves. People want the software to simulate the real world, not talk from the developers.

Rep inbound, Starlight. You simply posted the truth.

But don't programmers have to give each of the new units damage models, gunnery modelling, etc? And I really don't know, but are you sure there are no ED employees making 3D models?

Yes, really. Try locking a jammer without transmitting.

What? Without transmitting? You need some coffee.

1-2-3 coming over the top? Show me. :worthy:

Try something stupid! http://members.iglou.com/goya551/Threading%20the%20Bridge.wmv

Yes. Lockon Gold includes a CD of Flaming Cliffs. But you might have a problem with the Lockon Gold Flaming Cliffs CD. Some of them are corrupt and you would have to have it exchanged for a working disk.

Use the drogue chute.

Sort of OT but, is there a way to disable the Fighterstick mode selector button (index finger, right side if stick head) so that it doesn't alternate sending three different button IDs? I've recently noticed that it's screwing up my in game FB/PF settings. It's not a problem in LOMAC.