Weltensegler

I believe to remember an old Lock On thread where ED or some modder said accurate tree collision would have an extremely high performance hit. Of course you could simplify it with a box for a forest etc but then you cant fly between trees and more important not even shoot from above between trees. But maybe that all changed in the last years?

Thanks Wags! But that doesn't leave it off the hook. You should be at 80% before beta release with yours so why not letting an inexperienced 3rd party start trying the E model with the SFM and in details that don't conflict with Boeing. Actually helps the purpose. Also if I come to ED and ask for permission to do a plane that you keep confidential...how could you NOT give me permission. Saying "no, not that plane" would be too much of an hint for someone that's probably not under NDA at this time :) Don't get mad at me Wags I am just speculating! You are my hero ...even in politics.

Well the F16 is also done by somebody here but not sure if it was a contracted 3rd party dev. I go for "trap" as well :) ..nice try though If so... then I like the game that ED is playing with us. Its like a good movie story that plays with you and makes you all exited until it reveals finally. And I really really hope they're still doing the F18 no matter which model. I mean all candidates of polls about that multi role are kind of covered now/soon. So that doesn't mean that they do it too..maybe different model and more important with the AFM.

Are you sure? I could swear as soon as I shut down engines I see a count down running upper left screen. But there is a good chance that I was flying 1111 then since DCSW usually crashes before I can RTB :)

No! please ED...I don't mean to rush. Take your time and make it right. I specifically like all this talking and guessing about it and the excitement that builds up. The release is even more fun then. Bc THEN its worth the word "release"! Gimme the F18 for xmas and I am fine with it. And feel free to feed us with indications that lead nowhere just to keep up the excitement and rumors :)

It will still have bugs or it wouldn't be a beta :) They just fix them so far that you can test it at least for a few minutes before it crashes I guess. The rest..well that's what we are there for...beta testing and bug reports.

might need to have the conopy open ...at least a bit. I think

i7 is wonderful for OC! with a cheap closed water cooler for 80 bucks you can bring it up to 4,8GHz. I have mine on 4.4 and on hot days with cooling and fans on low/medium it runs on 58C under full stress (28C in idle). Its awesome! I could go higher but I like to keep it quiet :) no experience with i5 and OC

And how can you get past step4 without finding a DCSW folder?

Submarines might take some time but ships? ...maybe the object type needs to be changed other than that it shouldn't be too hard to implement their route then in CA. But one thing at a time :) lets enjoy CA beta soon first.

like that one! :)

as long as those two universes are multiplayer compatible...

Me too :) Its a true picture from the future...but even the future is subject to change :)

It is a bit confusing how the site is setup. Read carfully (I missed it too the first time) just get the exe and the bins for DCSW NOT the P51D and then in addition the A10c 1.1.2.1 patch which is the whole A10 module for A10 (you don't need the standalone 1111 with all its bins) If you did so then I dont know either. Concerning the corruption I have to say I always had problems with that from DCS servers. But check which one is corrupt and download again..sometimes it takes 4 times or more. Since my internet went to 20mbit and I don't share it anymore (maybe more stable now or just better location) it actually didn't happen again but could be coincidence. good luck

Yes DCSW a10 doesn't have the same or all key configs yet. Mostly minor stuff though like switching MFDS on etc. And I believe some callbacks that helios uses are not working the same. Maybe next patch

maybe too greedy with payload? :D 2x3AGM;2x3GBU12 full fuel; external tanks? Conopy closed? just kidding...I'm sure the break issues are the better suggestions post a track or the mission and we can try it?

Whats the big deal about wanting to know? I just hoped for it since before they announced to do another fix wing and I built my cockpit last year specifically as a A10/F18 hybrid (F16 would work too for the cockpit besides its center stick). I am even more interested in the F18 than in CA or Nevada,..though speaking that out...maybe not more than Nevada :) Anyways, that's the big deal for me and I collected every rumor and reason I could get and my guts tell me that I built my cockpit the right way :-p

F18 .. wanna bet? :)

It's beta. The A10 beta also was worse in performance until the final release was compiled. And actually even during beta updates the performance was fluctuating. This is just the start of DCSW beta...give it some time or fly A10C 1.1.1.1 so long if you don't wanna cut down on graphics in your settings to compensate.

Great so then you (/we) are finally free from ubisoft. Regarding the train...thats interesting ... could be a funny penalty for team killing to provide supply for a warehouse by train :D So much cooler than the sandbox with banana song in old Arma times.

Relax F18 will be originally DCS :) ...I have no doubts

bc OpenGL is old and limited and doesn't have that much potential. I think that goes hand in hand with the graphics cards development that adjusted accordingly so game engines do too. You can't sell a game when you need a 4000 bucks quadro card to play it :)

I was worried too first thinking of a A2A between a FC2 plane and a DCS F18 and how fair that would be. But agreed, we can still choose what we fly and so can the mission builders. Btw does anyone know...if FC3 gets compatible to DCSW but is still binded with some rights to ubisoft which is why you need the lomac installation still...couldn't they just bring those updated planes into DCSW as modules to get rid of ubisoft once and for all. Well I guess the answer is as long as anything from the FC planes is used they cant sell it under a different name, right?

Its definitely good for making movies! This way you have control over those actors that you normaly had to record just flying way-points.

Well yeah I did too but since now DCS world is going into beta I thought its time to let go and make some space on the drives :)