Jump to content

killkenny1

Members
  • Posts

    463
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by killkenny1

  1. Тогда я думаю Вам не помешало бы обратиться к Разбам напрямую.
  2. That's because ED has no plans doing Soviet WWII planes, not because of laws. Octogus G did I-16 and if rumours are correct they are now doing La-7. ED don't develop Soviet WWII birds because they don't fit in the current theater of war ED is developing based around second front. This is what one of the devs said IIRC.
  3. J-11A это Су-27СК а не СМ.
  4. Flying around with Jeff I really wish for one thing - that it would have a cheek station for TPOD a la F-16. That would allow for more flexible loadouts.
  5. Ага... Я уже думаю прикупить себе модель Су-30СМ от Звезды. Если не в симе, так хоть по квартире с ней полетаю...
  6. Хммм, если нам даже престарелые 9.13 и Су-27П не светят в Джедай Комбат Симулятор, то Як-130 я думаю тем более нам не видать...
  7. Про обнаружение вертолётов на Су-27 вроде писали MaxMPower и Air_Man в ветке Су-27 - ответы лётчиков (к сожалению страницу не подскажу). Если мне память не изменяет Air_Man ещё и про МиГ-23 писал.
  8. Ну как бы 9.12 из стил хаппенинг.
  9. И-16 это от другого производителя (Octopus G). На решение какой самолёт им производить я думаю ЕД не имеет никакого отношения. ЕД пока не планируют советские ЛА ВМВ. Кстати Octopus G вроде Ла-7 разрабатывают https://stormbirds.blog/2020/10/23/la-7-teased-by-octopusg/
  10. Фу, пронесло! А то чуть сердце у меня не схватило...
  11. That's one sexy livery!
  12. ED could make a Su-33 + Kuzia bundle for an extra 5 Euros. Without the crew it's not worth more than that...
  13. Fair point. Although, I thought they do have flight manuals in the plane, not strapped to the knees of course. In my case I just copy a few pages, or just make my own small "cheat sheet" in order not to clutter the kneeboard. Making my own actually is kinda beneficial, as I find it easier to remember something then I write it myself. Otherwise, maybe a second kneeboard containing just manual would be a cool feature, with all chapter bookmarks available for easier navigation. Maybe even search, but not sure if ED would want to do that.
  14. Chizh did throw this out there not too far ago: Translation: regarding Su-27S no one said "forget about it" I would still love to see something like SM, but I'm again going off-topic and wishful thinking.
  15. Just give us the planes and we will find use for them. Viggen also doesn't have much to do in Caucasus region, yet there it is. There shouldn't be much difference between Indian Navy MiG-29K and Russian Navy MiG-29K, and Su-30MKI and Su-30SM, apart from some avionics. So Indian variant ~ Russian variant.
  16. Very nice! Now I need to learn how to make a livery. Have some ideas for a personal JF-17 livery
  17. Or you can add the manual to the kneeboard.
  18. Everyone I lot of people would love to see a K variant, but unfortunately beggars can't be choosers. As far as I understand A is the variant which ED received permission to do. I would love to see even the first K (9.31) or M (9.31 was based on M), which didn't go into production. Still old tech (end of 80s), but is a bit more modern and has increased capability over 9.12 and 9.13. -29M loadout: http://airwar.ru/image/idop/fighter/mig29m/mig29m-2.gif Its cockpit: http://airwar.ru/image/idop/fighter/mig29m/mig29m-8.jpg Mhhh, tasty http://airwar.ru/image/idop/fighter/mig29m/mig29m-4.jpg
  19. Making them accessible through start menu would also be nice.
  20. Can this module get even better? What next, WXR?
  21. Oh yes, 2.5, I remember that too, though it had a different -29K - 9.31. New one is 9.41.
  22. Oh yes, MiG-29K... Maybe one day... After 100 years...
  23. Kate Perederko - CEO at ED. Until the last moment was expecting it to be anticipated MiG-29A... Even such an outdated A/C would blow my mind. But oh well... Guess I will continue the waiting game... But once again, congrats to Apache guys, I'm sure ED will deliver a great aircraft! 2 years after EA release :D:D:D
  24. Agree. Also a bit disappointing for me, but for everyone who has waited for this aircraft - congratulations!
  25. Don't forget, this is ED and DCS we are talking about. "Later this years" means "two weeks" which in reality means "sometime between two weeks and infinity, possibly next year, but more likely a year after."
×
×
  • Create New...