hein22

The NVG part is not supposed to happen so don't care. But the night raining scenario on the deck is very unrealistic with those drops being like lasers. Should be corrected IMHO.

Thanks Santi for the tip on the cage uncage. IRL, not sure what version of the lot 20 though, the first press of the undesignate button just erases the TGT and leaves the pod where it was pointing, second press (or pressing undesignate when no TGT exists) returns to snowplow. Can't say where I got this information due to forum rules and no one will care if I'm saying the truth or not, so I was hoping ED already had that data.

Yeah, we could not enjoy this feature so far.

Im sorry Gripes, not native english speaker here. Not sure if that was an insult to me or to the situation. In any case sorry if I said something disturbing.

By "this function" you mean that cage/uncage will do what it does now (stow) and undesignate will not snowplow in its first press but on the second one like IRL?

TWS mid course guidance isn't fixed, it is just mimicking STT and gives the target a launch warning outside of 10nm. That's why the DT2 won't work.

What?? So a10c jdam method in dcs has been wrong for 12 years? Where do you get this stuff?

I don't know what to say man. Mine was pitching a lot. Not as much as it used to before ED touched something, but it does pitch when thunderstorm.

Watch the track and you'll see what I'm talking about :)

Just used the heavy thunderstorm template.

Issue is still present in current OB. Please ED can you fix this and all the TWS problems? TWS is broken since it came out, we never had the chance to enjoy it. Current two major bugs are: TWS gives launch warning outside of 10nm, TWS guides the missile magically when radar loses track and starts using the ageing timing.

Hi NL. What do you mean by "this function"? Which function is that? Thanks.

After playing more with the SC I found out that AI goes through static even if they are well placed (like the manual says). So this is currently killing the visual realism more than it helps not to. If only what the manual says was true then the experience would be 10 out of 10 points. My two cents, hope it helps you guys at ED.

If ED knew about this all the time maybe pushing mark points into OB would have been a good decision as to make the hornet experience more friendly.

I just saw this post. Boy how dissapointed I am. Not that anyone cares, but you know.

Ouch.

Good observation. Were you able to watch the track? There we can see how severe the movement is. There is no stabilization of any kind now in SC, hence the report. I hope NL or BN can let us know what the team thinks.

From experience, I don't think ED cares about these kind of suggestions when they already made a decision. Would be nice though.

Roger that, I even agree. Maybe correcting the manual so it reflects this design decision? Right now it states different like I said in OP. Thanks NL.

Like the title says, track attached. Manual says that if a static prevents a taxi route from being used then the AI aircraft is despawned, which is not happening in current OB. Thanks. AI goes through static.trk

Track or it didn't happen.

It would be awesome if what the manual says in page 78 was implemented with elevators as it would bring a lot of realism. "Aircraft that cannot fit on the flight deck are stored below on the hangar deck until a suitable parking spot is free". Currently those aircraft just appear suddenly when a parking comes available, that magic appearance takes away some of the realism achieved by the great SC. It would be much better if those came up in the elevators instead. Thanks ED.

Same here. Also ICLS doesn't match the ball, when one says high the other says low. I know both are inverted (low ball means low and low glideslope arrow means high).

Hornet players don't show salute, only AI. I was kidding anyway about the seriousness of the thing in case it wasn't clear :(

So the AI got the pilot salute animation and players didn't?? ED is playing with my mind? Emotions are all I got today.