hein22

I couldn't even see the IFLOS in wags' video, only the pop up one. Did we have a step back in ball's visibility?

No, the specific item was included in the changelog, so they missed this magic guidance part of the bug. At least that's how I see this. I might be wrong of course.

Take it easy, a lot of people is struggling with this now. Probably ED misunderstood the documents like they did with the JDAMs, it can happen to anyone, documents are very complex. Hopefully they will revisit this in the future. For now, all they say is that it is correct. It means they are working on different aspects of the hornet and need more time to look at this.

Those would keep us away from DCS and forums for a long long time :)

Please refer to my posts. It says fixed internally because one part of the bug was fixed but the other one is still broken. So there needs to be an acknowledgement from ED so they can tackle the issue.

Same here. I haven't launched DCS since Kate's post. I feel that eagle dynamics management is tearing apart, and the community won't stop fighting and insulting other people constantly here. Makes me very sad.

If you use WPDSG with perfect elevation the bug still exists so no, it is not a matter of slant range.

So the thing about manually selecting CCIP is fixed now as shown in the changelog for OB. But the AUTO bombing is still wrong and bombs always have the same impact point (long). I wonder if this is related to the JDAM precision bug? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4273280&postcount=7

Auto bomb is broken since day 1, impact error is always the same so there is no "dumb bomb factor" here, ED knows about it. It is WIP.

Good catch!

I don't have problems with ED coming across issues and miss their targets, I don't particularly consider that having good management skills but I understand it can happen. What I do find very offensive to the community is watching a post that was more a novel than a forum thread, from the COO saying that the MP issues prevented ED to launch the SC, and now we start reading these kind of things about redoing some stuff here and there. So the first launch date was march, then april, now may! But hey, it was ready in march, we only didn't launch because there was a big sale, and then we didn't launch because the MP issues, and then we didn't launch because we are redoing some stuff. And this is coming from someone who has a normal life with children, spouse, job, etc. I can't even imagine being in the shoes of someone who reserved a free day at work to have some quality time with his/her favorite simulator's module that was supposed to launch. I also write positive threads about ED and their huge work and attention to detail, which by the way the only thing ED said on it was "Please don't post anything confidential". Jesus ED! I hope I don't make anyone angry here, which lately is easier than cooking a hotdog.

Guys, the thing is that the aspect memory was fixed but the missile still guides magically. I attached a track where I intentionally lose radar contact by moving the antenna up fully and the aspect in radar and HUD is fine, fixed. The missile though, guides anyway. I made the target make two turns and the missile followed both turns until the exact time that the memory timer (32) reached 0, at that time the missile went ballistic.

How does that relate to DCS? We don't have that pulse feature to deceive others. Sorry I don't understand.

Can you guys elaborate more about this? I don't seem to understand what this is all about but I'm interested in.

No, that was true in the first release of DL but was then changed by ED. Currently there is no need to have TACAN ON. I had it off earlier and DL worked fine. However I think real life behavior would be to have to have tacan on since it is shared in the MIDS antenna. But ED coded it differently, don't know if it is correct or not.

PPLI works fine... I think FF is broken.

Please do, but not only for me, for all the replies like the one you made here that don't even try to help anyone but insult the poster. I don't know how things are in chile, but it isn't nice writing a post only to insult a person. I hope you can find peace some day.

XD

I don't think anyone appreciates your rude comments, maybe the one who's ten years old is you. I know you're known on these forums for not being very polite but take it easy, we are people sharing here, there is no need for you to be so harsh :)

[ NO NEWS YET ABOUT A DATE ]Carrier next wednesday? So Kate said that if they don't solve the MP issues by next Wednesday they will release the SC for SP. Is this another statement that ED is going to miss or are we going to get the SC next week?

When are we going to see this fixed? Implementing TWS with this bug is kind of useless IMHO. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=258631

Friendly bump x2

What poll??? where is it?

Although I think Wags' post only demonstrates more the shortcomings of ED, I do want to take the survey, where can I find it?

It was reported some time last year but discarded by ED. It is a bug but we'll have to wait for ED to acknowledge it. The whole hornet is very much WIP so maybe later it will be fixed.