Jump to content

F l a n k e r

Members
  • Posts

    376
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by F l a n k e r

  1. Hi Rudel, congratulations also from me for the wonderful new module! About "updates for the external model", it seems to me, but I could be wrong since I judge "at a glance", that the dorsal spine is a bit too big. Thanks again for your work anyway!
  2. Mhmm, hope this wasn't already posted yet: I've done the take off tutorial, than, once in the air, I started to do some maneuvering that was not appreciated by my engine, which shut down himself. Since I had to eject, I directed the aircraft to a lawn and than I bailed out. Since I was close to the aircraft, I tought to come closer to it and this is what I found! My pilot still in the cockpit, missing camo, strange 000 numbers, and golden flaps (probably the latter belong to the base livery). PS: I forgot my congratulations, this is the best fighter in the (DCS) World!
  3. Unacceptable! Too vague: I need the milliseconds!
  4. Beautiful artwork! I'm impressed, how do you make them? I mean, it's a 3D render + Photoshop postproduction, right?
  5. Exactly, moreover, the doors are two for side: a first one that bleed air and a second that sucks air (suction relief door).
  6. I agree, plus they are only few people working at this module. But I still think that a bit too many time is passed... the project has become old and then they had to update it to the new standards. And now we got the EDGE: I hope this is really the last one before the relase.
  7. Four years are enough to make a complete game, not just a module...
  8. Release the manual can be a good idea even to check and improve it. Some of us here are fairly competent in the field, I noticed. PS: beated on time by Aginor... :(
  9. outlawal2, in fact Rabbit talks about this people and is not Rabbit that names them "Naysayers" (actually it was J7G). People that write "respectful, thoughtful and meaningful posts" but not perfectly in line with "thank you sirs! yes sirs!". If you write a post in a forum, you open yourself to constructive criticism. And this is absolutely valid also for the developers. But this is what you said.
  10. I agree with you regarding the first part: F-5E Tiger II or Mirage IIIC would be the best suitable opponent with respect to F-4. But I think it's natural that the F-4 receives more support. Plus it's also nice to see, as opposed to the other two! ;) But I find it hard to believe that "The F-4 simply out classed by the aircraft of Its times a large margin." :D
  11. Perhaps also an A-4 Skyhawk would be interesting, and hopefully we can have one:
  12. For me: * English Electric Lightning * Dassault Mirage III * Northrop F-5 * FIAT G.91 * Saab 37 Viggen (? don't know wich version) but a McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II would be a pleasure!
  13. Thank you for sharing that, spyro23. Allesmor Obranna said something similar in http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2079533&postcount=161.
  14. Be honest, you enjoy to see us suffer!
  15. Yeah, I know that you already searched over Google like I've done, but I post it anyway.
  16. Sorry guys, but if someone post images of a "rivet by rivet" textures and detailed 3D model on a forum, this imply comments from the other users (of course, circumstantial and polite).
  17. Sorry Isegrim, when it happens they can complain about that. ;) I have posted legitimate and humble question (as well as KewinSawicki) and we received responses just as kind (and also interesting). Why make a tragedy for something that simply has not happened? :D
  18. Mhmm, flaming about what? :) As I said I appreciate your point of view. But constructive comments are welcome for professionals. OK, OK, maybe they should not be too much though! ;)
  19. Thanks! PS to Isegrim: I got your point, but I'm also a professional, so I like if people is committed to review my work. You know, it's not very constructive if everyone tells me I'm good...
  20. Hi Rudel! It seems to me that the shape of the wing upper pylon is too squared, I mean that for me the front height of the pylon must be higher than the aft. So the missile is slightly pointed towards the terrain. May be an optical effect of perspective anyway!
  21. If so, you're late...
  22. TOASTY!!!!!!!
  23. Try to watch Rudel's twich channel (http://de.twitch.tv/rudel82), he was working at the tail fin texures few hours ago. It's better than any screenshot!
  24. Ehm, this poll obviously means "after the completion and the release of MiG-21bis".
×
×
  • Create New...