JuanOscar Posted July 20, 2014 Posted July 20, 2014 (edited) Buenas! We want to open this new thread, not to show a particular update, but to make something different, and show the C-101 from a different perspective. Once the product be released, we would be very pleased if you show us the C-101 from your office, whatever it is. We think that could be fun see the C-101 around the world. So we are open the thread thinking in the future as well. :pilotfly: No, that's not my office (unfortunately). Saludos. Juan Oscar. Edited July 20, 2014 by JuanOscar 2 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
-Flo- Posted July 20, 2014 Posted July 20, 2014 So I take it as a hint that an A340-module is next? :detective: (...The virtual pit is looking great btw)
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted July 20, 2014 ED Team Posted July 20, 2014 Looking good :thumbup: Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
kazereal Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Nice! :thumbup: "I would have written a shorter post, but I did not have the time."
Tango Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 (edited) So I take it as a hint that an A340-module is next? :detective: To do any Airbus is very hard work. The last time I worked on a project to attempt it, it took our team of 4 developers 3 years, and we didn't finish due to factors beyond our control. There are other Airbus projects in existence, and they are all counting development time in excess of 4 years. Many people think the FBW is hard to model, others the FMGC. These in isolation, whilst highly complex, are not difficult in their own right, but it is the combination and the fact they are highly automated and highly integrated, that makes it take such a long time. Multiple systems rely on data from other multiple systems, and on an Airbus, from systems you wouldn't dream were involved in another system, but are. Just a small example of such an obtuse system dependency is if you lose the #2 ADIRU you lose the bleed air pressure monitoring of the APU! Two systems you'd think would have nothing to do with each other, but when you think what the ADIRU actually does, it isn't so crazy. Finding out that kind of information is hard. Most details like this are not in the flight manuals due to Airbus systems design philosophy. "If the pilot can't fix it, then he doesn't need to know". There are all kinds of weird things in the abnormal/emergency checklists that Airbus understand that pilots don't have a clue why they do them. Needless to say, it's not in our plans at this time. (...The virtual pit is looking great btw)Thank you!! Best regards, Tango. Edited July 21, 2014 by Tango
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 I'll try to do the same, but my office is a bit more cramped. Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
Pizzicato Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Looking REALLY good, guys! :thumbup: Can't wait to start seeing some of these new modules go live! :pilotfly: i7-7700K @ 4.9Ghz | 16Gb DDR4 @ 3200Mhz | MSI Z270 Gaming M7 | MSI GeForce GTX 1080ti Gaming X | Win 10 Home | Thrustmaster Warthog | MFG Crosswind pedals | Oculus Rift S
Stratos Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 I will take the pic once you release the plane guys. Unfortunately I'm not a real life pilot :( BUT in process of getting a sports aircrat license. :D I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!
Buzzles Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 You know, I reckon someone will post of pic of them running the sim from inside an actual C-101 cockpit at some point. It has to happen. Fancy trying Star Citizen? Click here!
kazereal Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Finding out that kind of information is hard. Most details like this are not in the flight manuals due to Airbus systems design philosophy. "If the pilot can't fix it, then he doesn't need to know". There are all kinds of weird things in the abnormal/emergency checklists that Airbus understand that pilots don't have a clue why they do them. Just out of curiosity, do you get access to maintenance manuals, technical training manuals and so forth? Or does the cost and use of that kind of information prohibit the use of those as sources? "I would have written a shorter post, but I did not have the time."
Vibora Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 :thumbup: :D Roberto "Vibora" Seoane Alas Rojas [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Deadsix Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 To do any Airbus is very hard work. The last time I worked on a project to attempt it, it took our team of 4 developers 3 years, and we didn't finish due to factors beyond our control. There are other Airbus projects in existence, and they are all counting development time in excess of 4 years. Best regards, Tango. FS Labs A320 announced in 2010 still not out yet. They did make a great Concorde though. Nice work Tango as always.
Recommended Posts