ebabil Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 is there a certain aircarft list so far? i am especially curious about big and mid bombers of wwi. FC3 | UH-1 | Mi-8 | A-10C II | F/A-18 | Ka-50 III | F-14 | F-16 | AH-64 | Mi-24 | F-5 | F-15E| F-4| Tornado Persian Gulf | Nevada | Syria | NS-430 | Supercarrier // Wishlist: CH-53 | UH-60 Youtube MS FFB2 - TM Warthog - CH Pro Pedals - Trackir 5
SilentGun Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Wait a minute, where's the B-17? Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales... :)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)
Charly_Owl Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Wait a minute, where's the B-17? The B-17 is not a medium bomber :D VEAO explained their thought process regarding multi-engine WW2 aircraft. 1) The making of a heavy bomber is much, MUCH more complex than for fighter aircraft 2) The best way to create a reliable, performance-friendly multi-engine aircraft is to process by iterations 3) VEAO's plan is to start with a twin-engine (C-47), and from the lessons learned from the twin-engine they plan to apply these for heavy quad-engine bombers. Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library Chuck's Guides on Mudspike Chuck's Youtube Channel Chuck's Patreon
SilentGun Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 (edited) What?!? If I recall correctly the only heavy B-17's were the G and the F the E's were mediums right? "The four-engined B-17 was designed as a heavily-armed, long-range medium bomber. It became the mainstay of the USAF bomber offensive over Europe." http://www.fighter-planes.com/info/b17.htm Edited April 10, 2015 by SilentGun Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales... :)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)
Charly_Owl Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 (edited) What?!? If I recall correctly the only heavy B-17's were the G and the F the E's were mediums right? "The four-engined B-17 was designed as a heavily-armed, long-range medium bomber. It became the mainstay of the USAF bomber offensive over Europe." http://www.fighter-planes.com/info/b17.htm That's just plain wrong. By WW2 standards, the B-17 is considered a heavy. Same goes for the Lancaster. That's why most WW2-era documentaries refer to the Lanc, the B-24, the B-17, the Halifax, the Stirling and the Pe-8 as "The Heavies". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-17_Flying_Fortress The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is a four-engine heavy bomber aircraft developed in the 1930s for the United States Army Air Corps (USAAC). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_bomber Heavy bombers are bomber aircraft with the greatest bomb load carrying capacity and longest range of their time. You can also see it here: http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/heavy-bomber-aircraft.asp Edited April 10, 2015 by Charly_Owl Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library Chuck's Guides on Mudspike Chuck's Youtube Channel Chuck's Patreon
SilentGun Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 (edited) :huh:huh.. all the facts ive ever red led me to believe the B-17 was a medium. guess I got to go read more books!:smartass: EDIT: after looking around in my collection of books, I have concluded that the B-17 was a medium bomber until they redefined Heavy bomber "A heavy bomber is defined as having four engines, a long range and a large bomb load." So I was right (to an extent) but you are also right Charly_Owl. But hey its a win win :P Edited April 10, 2015 by SilentGun Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales... :)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)
vicx Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Of course I come to join the medium/heavy debate. The Bristol Beaufighter and the DeHavilland Mosquito (which are great aircraft) do not belong in this list. They are heavy fighter-bombers (only 2 crew) and the others are dedicated medium bombers or really close to being heavy-type bombers with two engines. If someone wants to create a thread for heavy fighter-bombers. I'll vote in that one.
Wolf Rider Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 (edited) personally, I'd like to see the "Dam Busters" and the "Pathfinders" for The Allies, and also some Axis bombers which flew havoc over London. Fully realising that The Pacific (PTO) will quite ways off... some "Doolittle Raiders" (plus CV-8 ;) ) and some "Betty's" :) Edited April 10, 2015 by Wolf Rider City Hall is easier to fight, than a boys' club - an observation :P "Resort is had to ridicule only when reason is against us." - Jefferson "Give a group of potheads a bunch of weed and nothing to smoke out of, and they'll quickly turn into engineers... its simply amazing." EVGA X99 FTW, EVGA GTX980Ti FTW, i7 5930K, 16Gb Corsair Dominator 2666Hz, Windows 7 Ultimate 64Bit, Intel 520 SSD x 2, Samsung PX2370 monitor and all the other toys - "I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar"
OutOnTheOP Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Of course I come to join the medium/heavy debate. The Bristol Beaufighter and the DeHavilland Mosquito (which are great aircraft) do not belong in this list. They are heavy fighter-bombers (only 2 crew) and the others are dedicated medium bombers or really close to being heavy-type bombers with two engines. If someone wants to create a thread for heavy fighter-bombers. I'll vote in that one. I would argue that bomb payload and lack of forward gun payload would indicate that Mosquito should be on the list, but Beaufighter, I agree, is more akin to Me110/ Me410/ P61, and should be regarded as a heavy fighter-bomber. I suppose technically, Mosquito wasn't a bomber, but filled a (now obsolete) role known as an "Invader", which I suppose would be akin to deep strike nowadays. Speaking of which: A-26C with 8-gun nose!
Kurfürst Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 That's just plain wrong. By WW2 standards, the B-17 is considered a heavy. The arguement for it is not without merit. The B-17 was a result of a procurement for a very long range maritime bomber, not a heavy bomber. Nobody particularly wanted it to be a four engine one, Boeing just cut the corners and made it a four engine one. In bomber capabilties, however, the early ones were not that much different from the better medium bombers of the war. The limited internal bombload, which is often laid at the doors of the B-17 in comparison but its largely unfair since it was put to a task (strategic bombin) which it was not supposed to do originally. http://www.kurfurst.org - The Messerschmitt Bf 109 Performance Resource Site Vezérünk a bátorság, Kísérőnk a szerencse! -Motto of the RHAF 101st 'Puma' Home Air Defense Fighter Regiment The Answer to the Ultimate Question of the K-4, the Universe, and Everything: Powerloading 550 HP / ton, 1593 having been made up to 31th March 1945, 314 K-4s were being operated in frontline service on 31 January 1945.
lothar29 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 B25 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Intel I7 4790K 4.0Ghz MSI z97 GAMING 5 G SKill Ripjaws 1600 4x8Gb 32Gb 2x120Gb Ssd Kingstone Seagate Barracuda 1Tb ASUS GTX980 TI Strix 6gb corsair CS750W Modular Saitek X52 Pro 7Years Old jaja :joystick: Saitek Rudder pedals TrackIR5
Silver_Dragon Posted October 12, 2015 Posted October 12, 2015 B-26 marauders on north africa (12th Bomb Group) YzuH4dzm3Cc For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
FlyGuyF119 Posted October 12, 2015 Posted October 12, 2015 Just give me all of them and ill be happy. V/R, Dave "FlyGuyF119" AG-51 MSI 990FXA-GD65, AMD FX-8370 Eight Core, DDR3 16Gb Ram, MSI GTX 970, ACER S271HL, 1TB SSD, Flight Stick and Throttles X-65F
Kal-El Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 If the 4 engine bomber are too complex and time consuming to build, wonder why these are not seen as good starts. B25, I would pay $100. Any developers, not to busy, out there that want my money? Specs: i7-4790K @4.00 ghz, EVGA 2080ti , 16GB ram, Samsung 512GB SSD x2. Gear: Virpil Alpha stick with Mongoos T-50CM2 throttle, Combat-Pro flight pedals, Track ir 5 & Reverb G2
The_Pharoah Posted November 29, 2015 Author Posted November 29, 2015 Ok we will now have the FW190, ME109, P51D, Spitfire Mk IX and P47D. Is it now about time we have something with >1 engine? A B25 or Bristol Beaufighter or A26 would be awesome. The Normandy map wouldn't be much without having bombers to escort. AMD AM4 Ryzen7 3700X 3.6ghz/MSI AM4 ATX MAG X570 Tomahawk DDR4/32GB DDR4 G.Skill 3600mhz/1TB 970 Evo SSD/ASUS RTX2070 8gb Super
Soulres Posted December 5, 2015 Posted December 5, 2015 What we need is simple cockpits (like the su25t) so Development will be faster/easier. And have advanced cockpits become available later(if you want) I love twin engine aircraft and expanding on the Types of aircraft you can fly, will bring different types of players.
VrValor Posted December 5, 2015 Posted December 5, 2015 I think Cliff of Dovers servers/campaigns are a good place to get ideas. Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 utilizzando Tapatalk Spirit is important: let him fly in the blue sky!
Darkwolf Posted December 6, 2015 Posted December 6, 2015 If the 4 engine bomber are too complex and time consuming to build, wonder why these are not seen as good starts. B25, I would pay $100. You know, both engines are same system to model. Shouldn't impact much on system ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] PC simulator news site. Also....Join the largest DCS community on Facebook :pilotfly:
Satanas Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 a crazy plane ..... P-61 Blackwidow ... :pilotfly:
Recommended Posts