Jump to content

F-15E?

JazonXD

By JazonXD
in RAZBAM

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Oban
Oban

I'd rather see  a pointless 1960's aircraft like the EE Lightning shelved, and the work redirected to the F15E, as it's pretty obvious the F15E is a much more sought after module over the Lightning, w

Viper1970
Viper1970

🤢 Another flying tablet. I don't like those new "glass only" cockpits. But that's the future 🤔

Beamscanner
Beamscanner

Tried cleaning it up alittle. Not much to make out in the air to ground mode. But it looks like he's in a DBS mode with the screen set to "Frozen". It also looks like he has Data-link tracks in air to

HWasp

HWasp

Posted
Posted
Agreed. My point wasn't to say cancel the F-15, but just leave my Mig alone. If the 15 is your dream aircraft great, enjoy it.

 

I think you might have misunderstood me, that wasn't aimed at you, but at the guy suggesting that Mig-23 sales will be low, therefore it is not needed...

blower

blower

Posted
Posted
Keep the 15E to yourselves, i'm bored of seeing again and again the same aircraft... Sim scene in general need more soviet era aircraft...
Maybe create a post about the Mig-23 and go talk there about it I don't care about it and I don't think the people on this post do because is about the F-15E not about Migs SukhoiS etc

 

Enviado desde mi VKY-L09 mediante Tapatalk

Sarraceno

Sarraceno

Posted
Posted
Maybe create a post about the Mig-23 and go talk there about it I don't care about it and I don't think the people on this post do because is about the F-15E not about Migs SukhoiS etc

 

Enviado desde mi VKY-L09 mediante Tapatalk

 

There is, with the difference there's no one asking to delay the 15 in favor of the 23

blower

blower

Posted
Posted

I did not ask to delay the 23 and maybe that's because there's more people interested in the F-15E anyway this is turning into an absurd discussion everyone has his own favorites and that's not gonna change

 

Enviado desde mi VKY-L09 mediante Tapatalk

Jester986

Jester986

Posted
Posted
How many Mig-23 you plan on selling ? If I were you I would invest the time and the money in F-15E, which is supposed to be your blockbaster .. that's my humble opinion.

 

This is why I chimed in about the Mig.

 

I think you might have misunderstood me, that wasn't aimed at you, but at the guy suggesting that Mig-23 sales will be low, therefore it is not needed...

 

 

And I knew this wasn't aimed at me, was just agreeing with you :thumbup:

  • 2 weeks later...
Zoomer

Zoomer

Posted
Posted
That will come in the future.

 

 

 

We are going to rescan the mirage cockpit in May. And hopefully a -5 cockpit aswell

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

Thanks, great news for us VR users. I really like the Mirage, but the cockpit is difficult to utilize with the current textures. The Harrier is more manageable cockpit wise in VR. I will definitely purchase the 2000-5 on completion, plus the F-15 & MiG-23. Again thanks for your efforts.

=DECOY=

=DECOY=

Posted
Posted

The model is still be developed by the 3D team. ;)

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk



 

Water cooled i9-9900K | Maximus Code XI MB | RTX3090  | 64GB | HP Reverb G2 
blower

blower

Posted
Posted
The model is still be developed by the 3D team. ;)

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Nice :) Will we see more screenshot soon?

 

Enviado desde mi VKY-L09 mediante Tapatalk

Blaze1

Blaze1

Posted
Posted

The following video is footage from the F-16's and F-15E's AN/AAQ-28(V) LITENING targeting pod.

At 2:07 you can also see side by side recordings of the APG-70 Air-to-Air radar mode and air-to-air TGP mode, the latter of which isn't available in the unclassified -34. ;)

 

Harlikwin

Harlikwin

Posted
Posted

I'd worry way more about actual functionality given that the mudhen has 2 seats and very advanced functionalty relative to either the M2k or Harrier. Both of which have their issues with A/G modes not working as they should.

New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)

Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).

Kylian717

Kylian717

Posted
Posted
The model is still be developed by the 3D team. ;)

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

 

 

And about systems ? I can’t wait the McDonnell Douglas F-15E.

Rainmaker

Rainmaker

Posted
Posted (edited)
The following video is footage from the F-16's and F-15E's AN/AAQ-28(V) LITENING targeting pod.

At 2:07 you can also see side by side recordings of the APG-70 Air-to-Air radar mode and air-to-air TGP mode, the latter of which isn't available in the unclassified -34. ;)

 

 

Just keep in mind, the manual that is publically available is light years behind the suite that is currently in the airplane, or what was in the airplane 15 years ago. Data link didn’t come until 2001, limited IAM capability not even in the airplane till circa ‘05, then things kind of started to pick up from there. Hopefully, having a license though Boeing, they are able to aquire some updated material to model systems off of. The -34 of 25 years ago is a lot different than what is in there now. With such high fidelity stuff that’s out there now with jets like the A-10, F/A-18, etc...it’ll be pretty far behind in capability if you try to integrate them in with the newer stuff. Of course, as I write this, I sure there are tons of people that are awaiting the F-14/Mig-21 releases, so what do I know. :lol:

Edited by Rainmaker
Blaze1

Blaze1

Posted
Posted
Just keep in mind, the manual that is publically available is light years behind the suite that is currently in the airplane, or what was in the airplane 15 years ago. Data link didn’t come until 2001, limited IAM capability not even in the airplane till circa ‘05, then things kind of started to pick up from there. Hopefully, having a license though Boeing, they are able to aquire some updated material to model systems off of. The -34 of 25 years ago is a lot different than what is in there now. With such high fidelity stuff that’s out there now with jets like the A-10, F/A-18, etc...it’ll be pretty far behind in capability if you try to integrate them in with the newer stuff. Of course, as I write this, I sure there are tons of people that are awaiting the F-14/Mig-21 releases, so what do I know. :lol:

I hear you Rainmaker. The video I posted is ancient, circa 2001 so pre-Sniper and perhaps wasn't even a production version of the Litening, but it was nice to see the displays. There's info 'out there' for Suite 4E+ and I think even one (same suite) with the early introduction of Sniper. JHMCS came much later and the and the AN/ASQ-236 even later after that, then there's the brand new AN/APG-82 ........

Rainmaker

Rainmaker

Posted
Posted
I hear you Rainmaker. The video I posted is ancient, circa 2001 so pre-Sniper and perhaps wasn't even a production version of the Litening, but it was nice to see the displays. There's info 'out there' for Suite 4E+ and I think even one (same suite) with the early introduction of Sniper. JHMCS came much later and the and the AN/ASQ-236 even later after that, then there's the brand new AN/APG-82 ........

 

Looks too skinny and too long to be a LITENING, could be wrong though. Looks almost like they were looking at the possibility of adopting the same pod the Navy has. The tracking diamond and gates look navyish too, I’ve only seen crosshairs and a box.

 

JHMCS could be a possibility, but I don’t think you’ll see any publically available info on the 236 other than it being a RECCE pod.

 

The 82 has been around for a bit, just mired in bueracratic stalemates due to funding. The AF had plans for it 10 years before the operational units started seeing it.

Blaze1

Blaze1

Posted
Posted
Looks too skinny and too long to be a LITENING, could be wrong though. Looks almost like they were looking at the possibility of adopting the same pod the Navy has. The tracking diamond and gates look navyish too, I’ve only seen crosshairs and a box.

 

JHMCS could be a possibility, but I don’t think you’ll see any publically available info on the 236 other than it being a RECCE pod.

 

The 82 has been around for a bit, just mired in bueracratic stalemates due to funding. The AF had plans for it 10 years before the operational units started seeing it.

Last time I checked (this was a while ago), the -82 was introduced to the Air Force in 2014? Not sure how many aircraft have been upgraded as of 2019, but I think the Mountain Home jets were some of the first to enjoy shooting those special trons.

Rainmaker

Rainmaker

Posted
Posted
Last time I checked (this was a while ago), the -82 was introduced to the Air Force in 2014? Not sure how many aircraft have been upgraded as of 2019, but I think the Mountain Home jets were some of the first to enjoy shooting those special trons.

 

The radar upgrade was doped out as “coming soon” a long time ago. Originally I think the plan was to give the E’s hand me down V1s from the C. At some point in time, in between sourcing funding, the plan changed...which is never out of the norm.

Blaze1

Blaze1

Posted
Posted

The F-15E does seem to have been neglected more than most in the wake of the F-35. The F-15C has received/continues to receive the VSDR, SATCOM, PASS/PAD, Sniper, FPCI and ADCP etc.

 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...