QuiGon Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 So. Have the GR9 as the non radar version and the yankie one as the radar version.... no point having both yankie versions in. I like your idea, if it doesn't cause too much additional work for the devs of course. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
joey45 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 Anyway. Even if it dose turn out to be DCS: Merica I'm still gonna make Lusty.. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
JINX_1391 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 So. Have the GR9 as the non radar version and the yankie one as the radar version.... no point having both yankie versions in. [sIGPIC]http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn266/JINX1391/jinx%20f99th%20sig_zps2hgu4xsl.png[/sIGPIC] "90% of the people who actually got to fly the F/A-18C module there (E3 2017) have never even heard of DCS or are otherwise totally undeserving pieces of trash." -Pyromanic4002
joey45 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 If I have offended anyone then sorry. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
JINX_1391 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 If I have offended anyone then sorry. Just a joke in the spirit of how competitively sided this poll is getting. I'm not personally offended so no harm. Cheers! [sIGPIC]http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn266/JINX1391/jinx%20f99th%20sig_zps2hgu4xsl.png[/sIGPIC] "90% of the people who actually got to fly the F/A-18C module there (E3 2017) have never even heard of DCS or are otherwise totally undeserving pieces of trash." -Pyromanic4002
qmaster312 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 I don't really care which one they make, as long as it is the one they can have ready the fastest :p My system: Intel Core i7 4770K@3.5Ghz, 16Gb Crucial 1600mhz DDR3, MSI GTX660 Gaming, Scythe Mugen 4, Samung 850 EVO 500GB, Fractal Design Define R4, WD Green 2TB, Windows 10 TM Warthog, Saitek Pro Flight Cessna Rudders DCS: A10C, UH-1, F15C "When everything seem to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it..." Henry Ford
Bullfrog_ Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 My understanding is that the B(NA) or GR7/9 from this poll will be one or the other. RAZBAM have not made a statement as to the possibility of doing both the B(NA) and GR7/9. They did at the end of the podcast where they announced the Harrier. They said something alongs the line of "Gr and maybe Av-8B Night attack" That said, it's looking to be more along the lines of Gr or Av-8B NA now. I doubt RAZBAM has fully committed yet
Wolfbite Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 (edited) GR7/9 of course. The Brit model would be my defo starter variant then maybe a Amerikanski pig dog one later down the line! Edited January 11, 2016 by Wolfbite 1 Please visit this thread and add a plus 1 to show support for getting a full fidelity Su-17/20/22 in game https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=220572
WHOGX5 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 I voted AV-8B. However, if RAZBAM will do an AV-8B Harrier II Plus later down the road, I would definitely want a GR7/9 now. -Col. Russ Everts opinion on surface-to-air missiles: "It makes you feel a little better if it's coming for one of your buddies. However, if it's coming for you, it doesn't make you feel too good, but it does rearrange your priorities." DCS Wishlist: MC-130E Combat Talon | F/A-18F Lot 26 | HH-60G Pave Hawk | E-2 Hawkeye/C-2 Greyhound | EA-6A/B Prowler | J-35F2/J Draken | RA-5C Vigilante
Hook47 Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 Wohoo! Keep on pulling ahead, GR9! I was worried the AV-8B would win
joey45 Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 Wohoo! Keep on pulling ahead, GR9! I was worried the AV-8B would win Likewise. Would rather have the GR version first then the American radar equipped version later on. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
Hook47 Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 Likewise. Would rather have the GR version first then the American radar equipped version later on. Totally agree! Can't wait for development to get rolling on this thing. I would say finish the M-2000C first but the amount of fixes on the RAZBAM internal build instills great confidence in me, so if they can do both at once I say go for it!
Stratos Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 Both planes are so balanced that Razbam should think in getting both released, I'm one of those users that will get both planes, specially If the AV-8B came with one of the USMC small carriers! I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!
Rangi Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 New pick on Razbams faceplace site. PC: 6600K @ 4.5 GHz, 12GB RAM, GTX 970, 32" 2K monitor.
TomCatMucDe Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 This poll is useless. Razbam already went ahead and is doing GR9, check out their facebook pace, they have first pics with it flying over Nevada.
QuiGon Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 This poll is useless. Razbam already went ahead and is doing GR9, check out their facebook pace, they have first pics with it flying over Nevada. Why was this poll useless? Looks like they followed the voting result :D Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
TomCatMucDe Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 Why was this poll useless? Looks like they followed the voting result :D The poll started 10 days ago. After just 10 days they show a 3D model of GR9 in the sky. Do you think they waited to see who is the winner to start? :D I am aware that the 3D model seems quite similar from outside but still. They have also shown a cockpit few days before. By useless I meant that whatever we vote, it is gonna be GR9. I dont want people to be disappointed :)
Rexamus Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 This poll is useless. Razbam already went ahead and is doing GR9, check out their facebook pace, they have first pics with it flying over Nevada. And in the very same post they say it is a generic exterior model, and no decision has been made on the final version.
mattebubben Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 The poll started 10 days ago. After just 10 days they show a 3D model of GR9 in the sky. Do you think they waited to see who is the winner to start? :D I am aware that the 3D model seems quite similar from outside but still. They have also shown a cockpit few days before. By useless I meant that whatever we vote, it is gonna be GR9. I dont want people to be disappointed :) and who says they dont have early variants of the AV-8B? And even if they just started working on the Gr.7/9 models it would be rather simple to convert it to a AV-8B at this early stage. So this does not really tell us anything...
King_Hrothgar Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 The poll started 10 days ago. After just 10 days they show a 3D model of GR9 in the sky. Do you think they waited to see who is the winner to start? :D I am aware that the 3D model seems quite similar from outside but still. They have also shown a cockpit few days before. By useless I meant that whatever we vote, it is gonna be GR9. I dont want people to be disappointed :) The cockpit is from FSX/P3D. And you also have to keep in mind that the Gr.9 and NA are the same basic aircraft with marginally different equipment installed. To this date, after following all the threads here on it closely, I'm still not entirely sure what the differences between the two are beyond the roundels painted on the wings and the lack of a gunpod option on the GR.9. To that end, I'm changing my vote to GR.9 on the assumption that the radar equipped AV-8B+ will be added later. I see no reason to skip a brit version in favor of a US one that will basically be replaced by another model later on.
zantron Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 (edited) AV-8B because gun honestly im not going to buy a gunless plane, be it gr7/gr9 or some pre-gun F-4 phantom (and I love F-4s) Edited January 14, 2016 by zantron “The murder of a man is still murder, even in wartime.” -Manfred von Richthofen
TomCatMucDe Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 The cockpit is from FSX/P3D. And you also have to keep in mind that the Gr.9 and NA are the same basic aircraft with marginally different equipment installed. To this date, after following all the threads here on it closely, I'm still not entirely sure what the differences between the two are beyond the roundels painted on the wings and the lack of a gunpod option on the GR.9. To that end, I'm changing my vote to GR.9 on the assumption that the radar equipped AV-8B+ will be added later. I see no reason to skip a brit version in favor of a US one that will basically be replaced by another model later on. are you implying that there is a bit of marketing in all this and that in the end we will get both, simply you shouldn't release 2 similar products at the same time as people would not acquire both but would chose one or the other. But if you push the AV-8B later, its lovers will buy first the GR9 and then the AV-8B? You are evil :D
void Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 AV-8B because gun honestly im not going to buy a gunless plane, be it gr7/gr9 or some pre-gun F-4 phantom (and I love F-4s) I`ll skip the GR9 too,for the same reason. Its not a manly fighter jet without the cannon.
King_Hrothgar Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 are you implying that there is a bit of marketing in all this and that in the end we will get both, simply you shouldn't release 2 similar products at the same time as people would not acquire both but would chose one or the other. But if you push the AV-8B later, its lovers will buy first the GR9 and then the AV-8B? You are evil :D Opposite really, the AV-8B fans are going to want the AIM-120 equipped AV-8B+ for the most part. The AV-8B-NA would be a substitute for them until that is released. The Gr.9 is the first choice of a lot of people though. So it makes sense to do that one and simply wait for the US version until the AV-8B+ can be made. With all that said, I'll probably only buy one late generation Harrier. It will likely be whatever is made first but I'll have to examine that once more info is available. I am open to an early model too though, I consider that completely separate.
Recommended Posts