WildBillKelsoe Posted September 30, 2016 Posted September 30, 2016 How to get the radar to face behind you? Sent from my SM-T231 using Tapatalk AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
Pikey Posted September 30, 2016 Posted September 30, 2016 Perhaps you should explain what you have seen, I'm sure you know how the FC3 radars work and what direction they point in. ___________________________________________________________________________ SIMPLE SCENERY SAVING * SIMPLE GROUP SAVING * SIMPLE STATIC SAVING *
feefifofum Posted September 30, 2016 Posted September 30, 2016 Simple. Turn around! :lol: THE GEORGIAN WAR - OFFICIAL F-15C DLC
WildBillKelsoe Posted November 7, 2016 Author Posted November 7, 2016 I read in su-27 manual that the radar in su-27 has both forward and rear hemispheres. does this mean I can track targets behind me? or is it implemented in HDD only and not radar screen on HUD Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
Ironhand Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) I read in su-27 manual that the radar in su-27 has both forward and rear hemispheres. does this mean I can track targets behind me? or is it implemented in HDD only and not radar screen on HUD Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Front and rear hemisphere. An approaching target is "front hemisphere". And receding (fleeing) target is "rear hemisphere". It's a reference to the bogey/target direction of travel and the part of him your radar is "seeing", not the direction your radar is facing. Edited November 7, 2016 by Ironhand YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1...CR6IZ7crfdZxDg _____ Win 11 Pro x64, Asrock Z790 Steel Legend MoBo, Intel i7-13700K, MSI RKT 4070 Super 12GB, Corsair Dominator DDR5 RAM 32GB.
komemiute Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Doesn't the '27 have actually another radar behind? In the rear cone between the engines?
Ironhand Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Doesn't the '27 have actually another radar behind? In the rear cone between the engines? That's the housing for the drag chute, I believe... YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1...CR6IZ7crfdZxDg _____ Win 11 Pro x64, Asrock Z790 Steel Legend MoBo, Intel i7-13700K, MSI RKT 4070 Super 12GB, Corsair Dominator DDR5 RAM 32GB.
Sryan Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 That's the housing for the drag chute, I believe... Correct, it holds the chute. On the '34 and '37 it does have a rearward facing radar iirc. Check my F-15C guide
QuiGon Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) Correct, it holds the chute. On the '34 and '37 it does have a rearward facing radar iirc. Yes, only the Su-27K (Su-33), Su-34, Su-35 and Su-37 have rear facing radars in their tail booms. The Su-27S does not. Edited November 7, 2016 by QuiGon Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
komemiute Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Ach! :P So many variations! Thanks for clarify! *thumb up*
red_coreSix Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Yes, only the Su-27K, Su-34, Su-35 and Su-37 have rear facing radars in their tail booms. The Su-27S does not. That is actually a wide spread myth. The Su-37 early prototype had one but the Su-27K, Su-34/35 do not have a rear facing radar. In the Su-34 for example the tail boom houses an EW suite.
QuiGon Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) That is actually a wide spread myth. The Su-37 early prototype had one but the Su-27K, Su-34/35 do not have a rear facing radar. In the Su-34 for example the tail boom houses an EW suite. Alright, looks like I was wrong about the Su-27K (Su-33), but the Su-34 and Su-35 are said to be equipped with the N012 rear facing radar by various sources (e.g.: http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/su35.html). Where did you got the info that this isn't the case? Edited November 7, 2016 by QuiGon Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
red_coreSix Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Alright, looks like I was wrong about the Su-27K (Su-33), but the Su-34 and Su-35 are said to be equipped with the N012 rear facing radar by various sources (e.g.: http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/su35.html). These sources are all referring to early prototype builds. The rear facing radars were all planned at some point but AFAIK they never really got anywhere and aren't implemented on any operational Russian fighters. I can't remember where I read this but the idea itself doesn't make a whole lot of sense as such a radar would only have a short range and now with the MSA/ESA hybrid IRBIS-E and other passive systems you're already getting very high off-boresight figures/detection ranges.
Darkbrotherhood7 Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) Alright, looks like I was wrong about the Su-27K (Su-33), but the Su-34 and Su-35 are said to be equipped with the N012 rear facing radar by various sources (e.g.: http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/su35.html). Where did you got the info that this isn't the case? No, neither the Su-34 or Su-35 have a rear radar, this is a mith. Su-35: http://www.cavok.com.br/blog/imagens-conheca-a-linha-de-montagem-do-caca-russo-sukhoi-su-35s/ Su-34: http://www.cavok.com.br/blog/argelia-estaria-interessada-no-sukhoi-su-34/ It's in portuguese, but there you can see how the rear cone really is. All the rear cone has is the APU and drag-chute. Edited November 7, 2016 by Darkbrotherhood7 Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
DarkFire Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 As far as I'm aware a rear-facing radar was tested in a very early Su-34 prototype and they even tried having R-73 missiles that would fire forwards, do a 180 and kill targets approaching from behind. I believe that they found that the range of the rear-facing radar and 180-turning R-73s were so poor that the space would be much better used by EW equipment, which is what the tail boom in the production Su-34 houses, along with the chute & APU exhaust. System Spec: Cooler Master Cosmos C700P Black Edition case. | AMD 5950X CPU | MSI RTX-3090 GPU | 32GB HyperX Predator PC4000 RAM | | TM Warthog stick & throttle | TrackIR 5 | Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 4 SSD 1TB (boot) | Samsung 870 QVO SSD 4TB (games) | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit. Personal wish list: DCS: Su-27SM & DCS: Avro Vulcan.
Darkbrotherhood7 Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) Indeed, it's possible that the Su-32 (very early Su-34 prototype) had a rear radar, but IMHO it is very unlikely. I mean, all I see is articles talking about it, but I have never seen any picture of any rear cone radar. It might be one of those lies that are so repeated, that become true, if you know what mean. Edited November 7, 2016 by Darkbrotherhood7 Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
WildBillKelsoe Posted November 7, 2016 Author Posted November 7, 2016 Front and rear hemisphere. An approaching target is "front hemisphere". And receding (fleeing) target is "rear hemisphere". It's a reference to the bogey/target direction of travel and the part of him your radar is "seeing", not the direction your radar is facing. Ah... my bad. Thanks man. Sent from my SM-T231 using Tapatalk AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
GGTharos Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Usually what happens is that the original source is parroted over and over and never retracted or explained. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
DarkFire Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) Hmm, I might have been wrong in my last post. The closest thing to reliable information I've found was a photo from MAKS 2009 that showed a small dielectric dome on the tip of the tail boom of an Su-34 that came from the aircrew training centre at Lipetsk. It's worth noting though that the bort number on that particular Su-34 was number 1, so it may well have been a very early production example or even an early prototype. Even then, I've not been able to find anything to suggest that what was under the dielectric dome was a rear-facing radar. It might equally (and more likely) be a receiver for the EW system on the aircraft. The Su-37 prototype allegedly featured a rear-facing radar (type unknown but possibly an N005?) but since nobody bought any of them, I guess we'll never know for sure. Of note, the Wikipedia article on the Su-34 mentions the rear-facing radar but has no relevant citation, so to be taken with a large pinch of salt. Sounds like this is indeed one of those ideas that came from a combination of observed features & a big dose of conjecture and then gets repeated so often that it becomes accepted knowledge, when in reality it isn't true. Edited to add: Some great photos of an Su-34 being build here. That thing is HUGE! http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/these-riveting-photos-show-how-russias-su-34-fullback-f-1735446088 Edited November 7, 2016 by DarkFire System Spec: Cooler Master Cosmos C700P Black Edition case. | AMD 5950X CPU | MSI RTX-3090 GPU | 32GB HyperX Predator PC4000 RAM | | TM Warthog stick & throttle | TrackIR 5 | Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 4 SSD 1TB (boot) | Samsung 870 QVO SSD 4TB (games) | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit. Personal wish list: DCS: Su-27SM & DCS: Avro Vulcan.
QuiGon Posted November 8, 2016 Posted November 8, 2016 Thanks to all the mythbusters! :D I conclude, that the actual implementation of rear facing radars in the Su-34, Su-35 and Su-37 is unkown, but unlikely. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
ZHeN Posted November 8, 2016 Posted November 8, 2016 is unkown not at all it's known - there are none :) I even doubt the T-50 PAK FA will have one [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
QuiGon Posted November 8, 2016 Posted November 8, 2016 (edited) not at all it's known - there are none :) I even doubt the T-50 PAK FA will have one Well, I haven't seen a reliable source so far. They are all contradicting each other as far as I can see. Edited November 8, 2016 by QuiGon Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
red_coreSix Posted November 8, 2016 Posted November 8, 2016 I even doubt the T-50 PAK FA will have one It doesn't need one, it has side looking AESA antennas :)
red_coreSix Posted November 8, 2016 Posted November 8, 2016 That is not a radar, it's one of the L402 arrays which is the PAK-FAs ECM suite.
Recommended Posts