Gunny Highway Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Is the interaction of the F-14 and the ships deck on Heatblurs to-do list or this an ED problem? IMO the physics for airplanes landing or parked on a moving ship are awful at the current moment. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0vsd0o5MT4FGzkWjaEucVg Combat Vet, Couch Pilot
ked Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Is the interaction of the F-14 and the ships deck on Heatblurs to-do list or this an ED problem? IMO the physics for airplanes landing or parked on a moving ship are awful at the current moment. you should look at the video released by bunnyap there's a great exemple of remade physics for landings in the f14
Cobra847 Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 The F-14 is stable and works well on the carrier. Nicholas Dackard Founder & Lead Artist Heatblur Simulations https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
QuiGon Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 You can be sure that this is beeing worked on with high priority as it is essential for both, Heatblurs F-14 + Forrestral as well as EDs F/A-18 + Nimitz. I'm not quiet sure how much Heatblur can do about this on their own, but ED is working on it as well. Edit: Sniped by Cobra himself :) Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Gunny Highway Posted June 9, 2017 Author Posted June 9, 2017 The F-14 is stable and works well on the carrier. That's good to hear, unfortunately I'm from Missouri. :book: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0vsd0o5MT4FGzkWjaEucVg Combat Vet, Couch Pilot
Ocelotunit Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 You can be sure that this is beeing worked on with high priority as it is essential for both, Heatblurs F-14 + Forrestral as well as EDs F/A-18 + Nimitz. I'm not quiet sure how much Heatblur can do about this on their own, but ED is working on it as well. Edit: Sniped by Cobra himself :) And the Harrier, a lot of naval aviation coming up! Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
joey45 Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 The F-14 is stable and works well on the carrier. What's the secret?? The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
Curly Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Will hook and deck interactions be fully modeled, i.e. hook skip bolters. The British commissioned a very detailed paper on the problem, back when they were still in flattop biz. http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/rm/2980.pdf It's interesting how these interactions still remain a major design issue. https://theaviationist.com/2012/01/09/f-35c-hook-problems/
Dino Might Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 Also, will there be carrier motion in terms of pitch and roll? Or will the ships continue to run on rails? I actually prefer the latter for initial familiarization, but would really like to have a more detailed environment to incorporate ship motion in the long term.
Joni Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 the ships already have roll motion, but im not sure about pitch :book: Intel Core i5-8600k + Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO | Gigabyte GTX 1070 Aorus 8G | 32GB DDR4 Corsair Vengance LPX Black 3200MHz | Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 3 | WD Black SN750 NVMe 500GB | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB | WD Green 240GB | WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 3 | WD Caviar Blue 500GB SATA 3 | EVGA 650 GQ 80+ Gold | Samsung CF391 Curved 32" | Corsair 400C | Steelseries Arctis 5 --- Razer Kraken X Lite | Logitech G305 | Redragon Dyaus 2 K509 | Xbox 360 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Thrustmaster TWCS | TrackIR 5
BlackLion213 Posted June 10, 2017 Posted June 10, 2017 Also, will there be carrier motion in terms of pitch and roll? Or will the ships continue to run on rails? I actually prefer the latter for initial familiarization, but would really like to have a more detailed environment to incorporate ship motion in the long term. They roll and pitch with the new water in 2.1. I confirmed that with some "carrier ops" in the UH-1. :) The overall effect looks great on deck and the rate/magnitude changes with sea state. -Nick
AG-51_Razor Posted June 10, 2017 Posted June 10, 2017 And the sea state is tied to the wind. It would be nice if ED would separate the two and give us another tab in the Weather menu for Sea State so that the pitch, roll and heave would NOT be related to the wind. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts