3G0 Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 Not to aid the enemy, but the F-15C in real life does use the AIM-9X, is was the first USAF aircraft to use it while the F-18 was the first Navy aircraft to use it. And Su 33? :music_whistling: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3G0 Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 Russian air force modernized Su 33 to Su 33M! Модернизация до Су-33М Корпорация Сухой с 2002 года проводит ремонт и модернизацию самолётов до уровня Су-33М. Всего модернизировано 19 истребителей Су-33. По данным на 5 октября 2010 года, компания «Сухой» проводила наземные и лётные испытания модернизированных истребителей Су-33[15][16] Существующие планы на модернизацию самолёта до уровня Су-33М сводятся к расширению функций при выполнении задач по разведке, целеуказанию и уничтожению наземных (морских) целей[17][17]: Модернизация двигателей или замена их на новые АЛ-31Ф-М1 с ресурсом на 1500 взлётов и посадок[8]; Установка систем спутниковой навигации GPS/ГЛОНАСС; Установка высокоточной системы бомбометания СВП-24[9]; Установка станции предупреждения об облучении Л-150. Модернизация Су-33 проводится на авиационном заводе "Сухого" им. Юрия Гагарина в Комсомольске-на-Амуре, а также силами 20-го авиаремонтного завода в городе Пушкине. Как правило, самолёты перегоняются на заводы небольшими партиями, по 2-4 машины. В рамках модернизации Су-33, производятся следующие работы: Продление ресурса планера Установка новых, более мощных двигателей АЛ-31Ф-М1. Данный двигатель имеет увеличенную до 13500 килограмм тягу в режиме форсажа. Для сравнение - "базовый" двигатель АЛ-31Ф 3-й серии, которыми оснащались Су-33 имели тягу в 12800 кг (при этом по сравнению с "обычным" АЛ-31Ф, которыми оснащались Су-27 двигатели Су-33 имели повышенную на 300 кг тягу). АЛ-31Ф-М1 имеет увеличенный до 2000 часов общий ресурс и до 1000 часов - межремонтный, обладает более совершенной цифровой системой управления и меньшим, по сравнению с "базовым" двигателем расходом топлива. Замена станции предупреждения об облучении СПО-15 "Берёза" на современную, гораздо более совершенную станцию Л-150 "Пастель", которой оснащаются все новые и модернизированные самолёты и вертолёты ВВС России. Замена приборного оборудования кабины. Установка нового прицельно-навигационного комплекса с подсистемой бомбометания СВП-24-33 "Гефест". По неподтверждённым данным в ходе модернизации Су-33 получают возможность применения и управляемого ракетного оружия класса "воздух-поверхность" And the L150 RWR on the assembly plant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 That chart can’t be right, ET only carried on stations 3 and 10. As well as R-77 and KH series, only possible under certain possible upgrade, you will never see a picture of it with any of those loadouts. As for the R-74E, R-73E/R-73m is much more realistic goal. But I think we’ll be able to make blue tears rain down no matter what happens Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3G0 Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 That chart can’t be right, ET only carried on stations 3 and 10. As well as R-77 and KH series, only possible under certain possible upgrade, you will never see a picture of it with any of those loadouts. As for the R-74E, R-73E/R-73m is much more realistic goal. But I think we’ll be able to make blue tears rain down no matter what happens Modernized Su 33! Perfect weapons vs FA 18C! Not real? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SovietAce Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 Ironic statement considering the fact that this very post is redfor tears being upset they lost one major advantage they held for 15 years. Well you got AIM 120 back them (and still have those). Now you got AIM 9X which is superior in allmost every aspect than R 73, not even speaking about fact that we must go with equipment from 80s against equipment from begining of 21s century . So its not that suprising that REDFOR wants some upgraded version of Archers, or perhaps upgraded Sukhois and MiGs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 not even speaking about fact that we must go with equipment from 80s against equipment from begining of 21s century Well that's historically quite accurate, tbh. And, umm... Lord of Salt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airhunter Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 I still don't get this "But the AIM-120". The current system of the game has the R-27ET being a better missile than the current AIM-120. The only advantage of the AIM-120 right now is spam, but in terms of range and ability to be defeated, the R-27ET is a better missile. What? The ET can be flared out quite easily. Let alone using terrain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Rage* Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 I still don't get this "But the AIM-120". The current system of the game has the R-27ET being a better missile than the current AIM-120. The only advantage of the AIM-120 right now is spam, but in terms of range and ability to be defeated, the R-27ET is a better missile. I searched, but could not find an internet meme worthy of this statement. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron886 Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 ITT people who don't appreciate the benefits of A-pole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kang Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 Actually, wouldn't it be much wiser to leave the whole discussion of 'balancing' to mission design? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted May 9, 2019 Author Share Posted May 9, 2019 Yeah, thank god mission creators can limit amount of missiles on aircraft. sent from Moto G5 using Tapatalk DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts