Tic-Tac UFO model

[grunf]

this video is in italy 2 fighter jets intercept U.F.O.

 

 

is real near Torino place

There are much better fakes on youtube than this.

[Xilon_x]

ok this is e real trasmision ufo interception

 

 

IRAQ

 

Edited February 25, 2019 by Xilon_x

[grunf]

The pilots probably saw this:

 

 

[Xilon_x]

loock this is real

 

 

 

the famous story of X-15 ufo intercept

 

[Jester986]

Thats interesting... But could it just be marked/classified that way by whatever datalink source they are getting it from? Either auto classified by some sensor system based on overall shape/size etc. Or manually by some guy who didn't know what to make of it.

 

Well if it was on the SA page they were getting some kind of IFF signal from it. Whether it was misclassified or intentionally misleading what it was who knows. And the guy who said it was just lens flare is probably right. With the amount of energy it takes to travel between stars there is no way aliens have visited us without us noticing unless they figured out how to break the second law of thermodynamics. And I'm not saying that couldn't be possible but until there is rock solid evidence it's so improbable it's not even worth discussing.

[Jester986]

And I wasn't trying to be a jerk in calling you a crusader but between the forum posts and the discord it seems like your pet bug that you're very intent on seeing fixed. If it is an issue yea get it sorted but to me it's hardly a concern when CCRP doesn't work, point track doesn't work from a cold start, a myriad of other strange tpod behavior, lack of jdams, etc it just hard for me to care about one system working too good in comparison.

[Harlikwin]

No worries, I didn't take it that way and I appear have a far thicker skin than many forum posters here. And hey I've been called way worse than a crusader. Deus Vult!

 

And really while it may seem like a pet bug, the basic issues also apply equally to the CCRP modes as well, which also have the more pressing ASL issue. And yes, everyone has their long list of things they want fixed on the Harrier. And yes, having a CCIP bombing mode that functionally works in game is great at the moment, especially since alot of the other bombing modes don't. But really its a larger issue in that all the modes should be reasonably well modeled and working. And yes I know its EA and hopefully they will fix it.

 

For me that particular issue is a bit philosophical as well. Here you have DCS which claims to be super high fidelity and ultra realistic sim(and some modules are exactly that IMO). But yet this fairly "simple" bombing system isn't actually modeled well or at all? And alot of people are just happy "putting the thing on the thing and hit the button" level of bombing? And lets compare that to the level of detail you are seeing other development moduleshttps://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=216324. I while I don't want it to turn into this dev vs that dev purse swinging contest it seems an apropos comparison to make.

 

It just seems fairly contradictory to me if someone is claiming to be a "hardcore simmer". Tons of guys are using NATOops procedures for starting everything up just right, doing correct formation flying, mission planning etc etc. And at the end of the day I'm told they shouldn't or don't really care if the bombs are hitting anyway when they are doing their bombing run wrong? IDK seems a bit off to me.

Edited February 26, 2019 by Harlikwin

[Harlikwin]

Well if it was on the SA page they were getting some kind of IFF signal from it. Whether it was misclassified or intentionally misleading what it was who knows. And the guy who said it was just lens flare is probably right. With the amount of energy it takes to travel between stars there is no way aliens have visited us without us noticing unless they figured out how to break the second law of thermodynamics. And I'm not saying that couldn't be possible but until there is rock solid evidence it's so improbable it's not even worth discussing.

 

While I admit I'm no F18 expert, I assume all contacts show on the SA page, whether from the aircraft own sensors (radar/flir whateva) OR datalink. I also "think" there is at least some basic level of target ID offered by the computor based on tgt size/other params. Or from the datalink.

 

As for aliens. Who knows, I like the bug vs person analogy in that regard. We think we're smart, with a single point of reference for what "intelligent" is.

[JIMJAM]

The "Tic Tac" ufo's are fairly common around the Gamecock MOA S of KSSC. I have seen 2. Flat white, no ver or horiz surfaces and a guess would be about the size of a Lear 25. One maintained straight and level but pulled away. #2 was a very fast mover and I was surprised it did not crack the air. Again straight and level. No report to atc as when operating near Bulldog range hot or cold you get a scripted "Not showing anything....." "Just made a call and Shaw says they have no aircraft in that area." And finally and my fav..." Would you like to file a report on that sighting? If so I can give you a number to call." No Thanks.....

Edited February 26, 2019 by JIMJAM

[SUBS17]

I had proposed the TR-3b.

do you copy my ideas?

what's the ****ing head?

who is the ridiculous who has ridiculous ideas?

 

 

 

 

That's probably from Heaven too lol. :D

I wonder who up there builds that stuff?

[SUBS17]

ok this is e real trasmision ufo interception

 

 

IRAQ

 

 

Those could be from Heaven too!:D

I wonder what they were up to?

[SUBS17]

this video is in italy 2 fighter jets intercept U.F.O.

 

 

is real near Torino place

 

Nice tight formation, that's a good video.:thumbup:

[Xilon_x]

in DCS there is the nevada with the 51.I area I had proposed the map of the famous Russian area 51 KAPUSTIN YAR here is a document.

 

 

 

Edited February 28, 2019 by Xilon_x

[SUBS17]

That's a fake Alien body, none of them look like that.

[Xilon_x]

That's a fake Alien body, none of them look like that.

 

 

this is e REAL ALIEN and REAL DOCYMENT

 

[Buzzles]

Can't believe I'm even going to bite but:

 

Yeahhh, they're totally CGI.

 

The 'skinny bob' one makes that clear. The quality of the 'alien' is far higher than the quality should be considering how poor that video is supposed to look.

 

If you've ever watched old films, especially 60's/70's handcam ones, it's easily apparent.

[Xilon_x]

Can't believe I'm even going to bite but:

 

Yeahhh, they're totally CGI.

 

The 'skinny bob' one makes that clear. The quality of the 'alien' is far higher than the quality should be considering how poor that video is supposed to look.

 

If you've ever watched old films, especially 60's/70's handcam ones, it's easily apparent.

 

 

 

 

 

Mission apollo 20 looks at this alien and tell me if it's true?

 

 

 

 

[Xilon_x]

and look this recently researce is real or fake?

 

[Xilon_x]

SOUTH ARABIA UFO

 

[Svsmokey]

Illustrative of the entire issue , there WAS NO Apollo 20 .

[Xilon_x]

i propose for DCS to nevada map EXPERMINTAL U.F.O.

TR-3B this is the model.

 

 

 

 

 

[Harlikwin]

Illustrative of the entire issue , there WAS NO Apollo 20 .

 

But its pretty convincing especially the KGB angle. I mean all those 40 dollar hammers had to pay for something. :megalol:

[Svsmokey]

They paid for $2000 toilet lids :)

[Jester986]

The entire state of Florida was hit with sleeping gas for a day so no one would notice the Saturn 5 launch for Apollo 20. Luckily no one else in the world noticed Florida was missing for a day. Now the real question is what happened with Apollo 18 and 19?

[Svsmokey]

They were beamed up by UFOs....