Mezelf Posted October 9, 2019 Posted October 9, 2019 Anyone have experience playing DCS on a Ryzen CPU? Specifically from the 3000 series. I need a new CPU (and system) and I was looking towards Ryzen because I don't want to support intel anymore, but I only really use computers for gaming. From what I've read DCS (and also literally all other games) prefers core speed over multiple cores and threads. AMD seems more consumer friendly, and they're cheaper and more value for the money, but what's the point of getting Ryzen if most developers optimize for intel instead?
razo+r Posted October 9, 2019 Posted October 9, 2019 3700X here and DCS runs as usual, okay, nothing special. But Boot time of windows is somehow twice as before with intel.
A2597 Posted October 9, 2019 Posted October 9, 2019 I use a R5 1600, DCS runs great. (In VR no less!)
BitMaster Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 The stock 3700x is on par with an all core overclocked Intel at 5G, both score circa 3000 points in Passmark single core score test. YOu should not directly compare MHz vs MHz, that is misleading. Looking at the L3 Cache, I'd go AMD without looking back. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
Mr_sukebe Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 ?? Why mention passmark? 7800x3d, 5080, 64GB, PCIE5 SSD - Oculus Pro - Moza (AB9), Virpil (Alpha, CM3, CM1 and CM2), WW (TOP and CP), TM (MFDs, Pendular Rudder), Tek Creations (F18 panel), Total Controls (Apache MFD), Jetseat
DerFangzahn Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 ?? Why mention passmark? Because it is as irrelvant as any other benchmark. If you want to know the performance in DCS you need to run DCS.
Mr_sukebe Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 Because it is as irrelvant as any other benchmark. If you want to know the performance in DCS you need to run DCS. Exactly. I thought that passmark was just another synthetic benchmark. 7800x3d, 5080, 64GB, PCIE5 SSD - Oculus Pro - Moza (AB9), Virpil (Alpha, CM3, CM1 and CM2), WW (TOP and CP), TM (MFDs, Pendular Rudder), Tek Creations (F18 panel), Total Controls (Apache MFD), Jetseat
Skyron Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 3600 here with 2018TI, and everything works perfect. 75-80% single core Ultilization in DCS
Sniper34 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 I have been using a R5 1600X with a 1080 GTX for 2 years already without problems . In a few months I will upgrade for a 3600x MSI X570 UNIFY \ R5 3600X \ 32Go DDR 3600 Cl 18 \ RX 6700XT \ LG 34 UM68 \ Logitech X56
DeltaMike Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 Multicore performance isn't going to help with DCS, and don't count on overclocking to improve single core performance. Consider X models. Shop carefully for RAM, it doesn't have to be the most expensive but it needs to be the highest speed that will work with your MB (up to a point, see https://www.wepc.com/reviews/best-ram-for-ryzen-3000/ for example. Make sure what you have your eye on works with your MB) Advantage for DCS is, you can "get there" -- or at least get close -- without the hassle and expense of overclocking. That saves you some money on cooling system and MB (which is kind of cool, if you're a connoisseur of cheap motherboards). There's an upgrade path. That said, I don't know that I would go AMD if I were building a machine from scratch just for DCS, I had other reasons to favor AMD Ryzen 5600X (stock), GBX570, 32Gb RAM, AMD 6900XT (reference), G2, WInwing Orion HOTAS, T-flight rudder
Recommended Posts