Jump to content

Missing implementations in the UH-1H Huey module.

Calabrone

By Calabrone
in DCS: UH-1H

 Share

Recommended Posts

Calabrone

Calabrone

Posted
Posted

Why has the IFF/APX-72 not been implemented?

Why haven't the internal fuel transfer switches been implemented?

Why the armament of the Huey UH-1H is not complete?

Thank you in advance for your answers.

  • Like 1
fapador

fapador

Posted
Posted (edited)

Why isn't right rudder need in high speeds implemented?

The answer would probably be that they dont have time to allocate in old modules even if that is to correct their wrong behaviours.

With all respect ED think's of old modules as mines that have been exhausted. 

Edited by fapador
  • Thanks 1

Obsessed with FM's

Zimmerdylan

Zimmerdylan

Posted
Posted

"This is really a pity, because it pushes me not to buy other modules of belsimtek. Thanks for the information."

 

 BINGO!!!! Not a red cent to ED........ If everyone would start keeping their word and hold back their $$$ then ED would probably start making this a priority. But too many people put their money back into modules and not where their mouth is. 

  • Like 1
Rudel_chw

Rudel_chw

Posted
Posted
On 11/30/2021 at 7:14 PM, fapador said:

With all respect ED think's of old modules as mines that have been exhausted. 


That’s not really true ... seems that you forgot the fairly recent completion of the multicrew ability that ED added to this module. 

  • Like 2

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

fapador

fapador

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

That’s not really true ... seems that you forgot the fairly recent completion of the multicrew ability that ED added to this module. 

Personally I don't care about multicrew. I don't play multiplayer. I am also  under the impression that it has been implemented as a testbench on the Huey...

There is more crucial stuff out there for  ED and Belsimtek to fix, correct and implement... than multicrew.

Obsessed with FM's

Rudel_chw

Rudel_chw

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, fapador said:

There is more crucial stuff out there for  ED and Belsimtek to fix, correct and implement... than multicrew.

 

That's your opinion .. but I was actually trying to refute your idea that old modules are mines that have been exhausted, which I think is not really true.

  • Like 2

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

Rudel_chw

Rudel_chw

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, fapador said:

@Rudel_chw Thats also your opinion, which as I explained I  think is false...

 

 

If it were false, then the Huey would not have multicrew .. hence, its true 🙂

  • Like 1

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

  • ED Team
BIGNEWY

BIGNEWY

Posted
  • ED Team
Posted
On 11/30/2021 at 9:56 PM, Calabrone said:

Why has the IFF/APX-72 not been implemented?

Why haven't the internal fuel transfer switches been implemented?

Why the armament of the Huey UH-1H is not complete?

Thank you in advance for your answers.

 

Hi, 

the UH-1H is feature completed, everything we planned to implement has been implemented. 

By all means make a wish list of items you would like to see and I can pass them to the team.

Any bug reports still valid and reported will be looked at when resources allow. Our teams are very busy currently so I can not give any ETA.   

If you think you have a bug that is not already reported please provide evidence and track replay examples.

 

thanks

14 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

 

That's your opinion .. but I was actually trying to refute your idea that old modules are mines that have been exhausted, which I think is not really true.

correct, we like to revisit our older modules, this can be seen with our A-10C and our Blackshark products that are over 10 years old and have gotten a lot of work recently with free and paid updates. Being a smaller studio it all depends on time and the resources available. 

thanks

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

smallCATPILOT.PNG.04bbece1b27ff1b2c193b174ec410fc0.PNG

Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status

Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal

fapador

fapador

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Rudel_chw said:

If it were false, then the Huey would not have multicrew .. hence, its true

I disagree. Multicrew on huey is just a benchmark for it to be further developed. I respect your opinion so should you. End of story. You insist so much it seems   more likely you are just trying to create an impression...

 @BIGNEWY Your teams are always busy, we  heard that before.. The real question is with which module???

What about the right pedal discrepancy in high speeds. It has been reported years ago and I personally reported it months ago. It has been even acknowledged by @Yo-Yo nothing has been mentioned regarding it or changed...

Edited by fapador
  • Like 1

Obsessed with FM's

  • ED Team
BIGNEWY

BIGNEWY

Posted
  • ED Team
Posted
4 minutes ago, fapador said:

I disagree. Multicrew on huey is just a benchmark for it to be further developed. I respect your opinion so should you. End of story. You insist so much it seems   more likely you are just trying to create an impression...

 @BIGNEWY  What about the right pedal discrepancy in high speeds. It has been reported years ago and I personally reported it months ago. It has been even acknowledged by @Yo-Yo nothing has been mentioned regarding it or changed...

 

 

Multi crew was planned for the UH-1H a long time ago and we delivered it, so it is true, its development has helped with the Mi-24 and our AH-64D. 

I will ask Yo-Yo about the pedal issue you mention. 

  • Like 1

smallCATPILOT.PNG.04bbece1b27ff1b2c193b174ec410fc0.PNG

Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status

Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal

Frederf

Frederf

Posted
Posted

I would like the IFF switches fixed. They used to move correctly until a more recent version and now knobs turn the wrong way and stop at wrong positions. I know it's just eye candy until if/when IFF becomes a real thing but sometimes I like to keep the habit up. Plus it integrates with Lot4ATC.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
War_Pig

War_Pig

Posted
Posted

One thing I really wish we could have is removal of the forward portion of of the XM21 Armament System along with the Flexible Sight, when the forward-firing miniguns are not present/equipped.

The flexible sight/forward firing miniguns were much more rare than the rockets, and while they're great in a dedicated gunship role, having the flexible sight and forward hardpoint present ANY time door guns are equipped (such as a slick) is annoying to me, and probably others.  The flexible sight gets in the way along when flying left seat in VR, as it's right there at eye level when stowed, and creates a big blind spot.  And no slick would be equipped with the entire armament system just so it could carry the two M60 door guns.

I'd like to be able to remove the forward mounts and flexible sight in the loadout options when they're not necessary.  Perhaps even remove the pilot's XM60 sight when forward-firing weapons are not equipped.  As it is presently, if we want door guns, we have to also carry all the other baggage along which is unfortunate.

  • Thanks 1
Flappie

Flappie

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, War_Pig said:

One thing I really wish we could have is removal of the forward portion of of the XM21 Armament System along with the Flexible Sight, when the forward-firing miniguns are not present/equipped.

The flexible sight/forward firing miniguns were much more rare than the rockets, and while they're great in a dedicated gunship role, having the flexible sight and forward hardpoint present ANY time door guns are equipped (such as a slick) is annoying to me, and probably others.  The flexible sight gets in the way along when flying left seat in VR, as it's right there at eye level when stowed, and creates a big blind spot.  And no slick would be equipped with the entire armament system just so it could carry the two M60 door guns.

I'd like to be able to remove the forward mounts and flexible sight in the loadout options when they're not necessary.  Perhaps even remove the pilot's XM60 sight when forward-firing weapons are not equipped.  As it is presently, if we want door guns, we have to also carry all the other baggage along which is unfortunate.

It's in good place in the wishlist. I'll soon ask for it (but I need to catch up with my bugs list at the moment).

  • Like 4

---

 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...