Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, JCTherik said:

Is the fuel flow not supposed to account for afterburner?

 

(F14-B, not tested in A)

Nope, fuel flow does not show afterburner fuel flow and that’s correct.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 10/12/2022 at 7:51 AM, JCTherik said:

Is the fuel flow not supposed to account for afterburner?

 

(F14-B, not tested in A)

To explain why, the instruments for the engine are concerned with the health and behavior of the Turbine engine itself. Afterburner is an external process to the engine operating parameters. You’re not using Fuel Flow to gauge endurance, it’s there to tell you the spinney bits of the engine are working as expected and you don’t want Afterburner hiding that.

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, RustBelt said:

To explain why, the instruments for the engine are concerned with the health and behavior of the Turbine engine itself. Afterburner is an external process to the engine operating parameters. You’re not using Fuel Flow to gauge endurance, it’s there to tell you the spinney bits of the engine are working as expected and you don’t want Afterburner hiding that.

Yet the F-15 does show AB ff. It's the manufacturer decision.

  • Like 1

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, draconus said:

Yet the F-15 does show AB ff. It's the manufacturer decision.

The Hornet does, too

And the F-16

Edited by Cab
  • Like 1
Posted

There actually is, its called fuel quantity indicator. If you are in full burner you can see fuel quantity dropping by hundred pounds every couple of seconds, so no need for a/b ff indicator 😀

note: Ive actually looked up SFC at max thrust of both TF-30 and F110 and they both use about 16 lbs/s per engine. So you are about 100lbs of fuel lighter every 3s on full burner.   

  • Like 3
Posted
7 hours ago, draconus said:

Yet the F-15 does show AB ff. It's the manufacturer decision.

Thats more a TF30 thing since it was originally designed for the Missiler then had After burner added in after that project was shut down. As well as 20 years of engine tech development between the TF30 and the F-110. 
 

Why the B and D work that way? Probably commonality with the A. 

7 hours ago, Cab said:

The Hornet does, too

And the F-16

 

All three designed around engines 20 years newer than the TF30. 

Posted
3 hours ago, RustBelt said:A. 

All three designed around engines 20 years newer than the TF30. 

True, but I don’t understand the significance of that here.

Posted

Because the FF not showing burner in the B was a holdover from the 20 year older TF30 in the A which was both less reliable, and originally not made with an afterburner. 
 

More modern engines took care of more of their own health and wellbeing. Especially when designed with an afterburner in the first place. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, RustBelt said:

Because the FF not showing burner in the B was a holdover from the 20 year older TF30 in the A which was both less reliable, and originally not made with an afterburner. 
 

More modern engines took care of more of their own health and wellbeing. Especially when designed with an afterburner in the first place. 

So your explanation above about being “concerned with the health and behavior” was specific to the TF30. Got it now.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...