Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think technically all Gs could have six missiles, no? Other than the preference of each user, there is nothing to prevent it afaik.

The wingtip pylons are kind of similar - they were the default for the early A/C, but also there are quite a lot of pictures of Italian S models flying with AIM-9s on the wintips, Aspide/AIM-7 on the outboard stations, and sometimes tanks on the inboards.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
45 minutes ago, Mike Force Team said:

Will we have the F-104A variant? I am asking for the version that had downward firing ejection seats. 

Mike Force Team 

Aerges you really gonna leave the whole team hanging?

yewls

  • Like 4
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 2/19/2025 at 1:28 AM, yewls said:

Aerges you really gonna leave the whole team hanging?

yewls

I think, it's advisable to scroll up, and read. Questions repeats many times, and somewhere on the road there is also an answer.
Regards.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, 303_Kermit said:

I think, it's advisable to scroll up, and read. Questions repeats many times, and somewhere on the road there is also an answer.
Regards.

Listen buddy this isn't about me, this is about the Mike Force Team

yewls

  • Like 2
Posted
Listen buddy this isn't about me, this is about the Mike Force Team
yewls
That was pretty much clear for the rest of us!

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/3/2025 at 5:58 PM, TLTeo said:

I think technically all Gs could have six missiles, no? Other than the preference of each user, there is nothing to prevent it afaik.

The wingtip pylons are kind of similar - they were the default for the early A/C, but also there are quite a lot of pictures of Italian S models flying with AIM-9s on the wintips, Aspide/AIM-7 on the outboard stations, and sometimes tanks on the inboards.

The more missiles - the less performance. F-104 was small and had very small drag, every missile except for two wingtip Sidewinders degraded its performance. Just like the Mirage III, MiG-21, Draken.

I remember dogfighting on MiG-21s with friends - against competent pilot you had to jettison all the missiles if the first turn didn't give the opportunity to fire them, or you were slowly, gradually losing the fight.

  • Like 3
Posted

Yep, plus it's not like you'll have enough fuel to get enough firing opportunities to fire all 6 missiles (or 8 in the case of the meme MIg-21 loadouts).

  • Like 3
Posted

Yes, for me the biggest appeal of flying F-104 is slick hotrod with Vulcan and maybe 2 Sidewinders and phenomenal performance in Air Superiority role BnZ as it was designed to do.

Not heavy cow dragging as many missiles as possible - especially this early missiles required very tight positioning, impossible without cutting edge performance anyway. And i predict Vulcan will be responsible for as many kills as missiles if not more as it was exceptionally good weapon in Starfighter days.

 

104.jpg.8cc75089cbb63ab13bdc71895dcc2455.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
vor 3 Stunden schrieb bies:

And i predict Vulcan will be responsible for as many kills as missiles if not more as it was exceptionally good weapon in Starfighter days.

Puh, better practice your aiming skills then. I personally find it very hard to hit anything with the gun in the F-4 - on MP servers at least.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, SuperKermit said:

Puh, better practice your aiming skills then. I personally find it very hard to hit anything with the gun in the F-4 - on MP servers at least.

I'm originally from WW2 sims, F-4's Vulcan feels like cheating 😉

  • Like 3
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...