Jump to content

Channel or Normandy 2.0 better detail?


Go to solution Solved by sthompson,

Recommended Posts

Posted

As the title says, wondering which Channel or Normandy 2.0 has better detail/more modern graphics systems?

Acer Predator Triton 700 || i7-7700HQ || 512GB SSD || 32GB RAM || GTX1080 Max-Q || FFB II and Thrustmaster TWCS Throttle || All DCS Modules

Posted

Normandy is the better map. In my opinion the detail is better than the channel map.  But perhaps most importantly it covers a greater area and encompasses the channel map area anyway.

To me, it seems that the channel map is dead and the future is Normandy for WW2 ops.

Youtube channel @Flightenvy680

 

Banner 1.png

Posted

I find the Channel still to be more detailed and immersive - especially on the English side.

5 37 39 47 51 52 98 ce spit (a4 hab) - cau chan kola mar nor nttr pg syr - 430 ca sc wwii

Posted
13 hours ago, Ghost79 said:

Normandy is the better map. In my opinion the detail is better than the channel map.  But perhaps most importantly it covers a greater area and encompasses the channel map area anyway.

To me, it seems that the channel map is dead and the future is Normandy for WW2 ops.

 

9 hours ago, Munin said:

I find the Channel still to be more detailed and immersive - especially on the English side.

two very different comments have me extra confused lol

  • Like 2

Acer Predator Triton 700 || i7-7700HQ || 512GB SSD || 32GB RAM || GTX1080 Max-Q || FFB II and Thrustmaster TWCS Throttle || All DCS Modules

  • Solution
Posted
1 hour ago, dresoccer4 said:

two very different comments have me extra confused lol

Part of the confusion may have to do with the areas of overlap. When Normandy 2 was released it was announced that the overlap areas with the channel map would have less detail than the rest of that map. You can see this by looking at the area of high detail for Normandy 2. See the FAQ linked below. So much of Normandy 2 is very detailed, but not including the part that overlaps with the Channel map. Personally I think flying over London or Paris on the Normandy map is very cool. But there is a lot of detail in other areas on the Channel map (e.g. around Dover) that is missing from the Normandy map. Neither is uniformly better than the other. I like the DLC campaigns for the Channel map a little better since flying from England to Normandy and back takes quite a while and isn't very interesting.

 

  • Like 1

I'm Softball on Multiplayer. NZXT Player Three Prime, i9-13900K@3.00GHz, 64GB DDR5, Win 11 Home, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, TrackIR 5, VKB Gunfighter III with MCG Ultimate grip, VKB STECS Standard Throttle, CH Pro pedals

Posted
20 hours ago, sthompson said:

Part of the confusion may have to do with the areas of overlap. When Normandy 2 was released it was announced that the overlap areas with the channel map would have less detail than the rest of that map. You can see this by looking at the area of high detail for Normandy 2. See the FAQ linked below. So much of Normandy 2 is very detailed, but not including the part that overlaps with the Channel map. Personally I think flying over London or Paris on the Normandy map is very cool. But there is a lot of detail in other areas on the Channel map (e.g. around Dover) that is missing from the Normandy map. Neither is uniformly better than the other. I like the DLC campaigns for the Channel map a little better since flying from England to Normandy and back takes quite a while and isn't very interesting.

 

thanks, this makes sense. So to recap the Normandy 2.0 map is better and more detailed for a larger area, except the area covered in the smaller Channel map, which has higher resolution for that singular area. 

  • Like 1

Acer Predator Triton 700 || i7-7700HQ || 512GB SSD || 32GB RAM || GTX1080 Max-Q || FFB II and Thrustmaster TWCS Throttle || All DCS Modules

Posted

Normandy 2 is a better map overall. The level of detail is good on both maps but the performance is better for the N2 map. Ultimately, it depends on the area that is most important to you. 

  • Like 1

9800x3d; rtx5080 FE; 64Gb RAM 6000MHz; 2Tb NVME; Quest Pro (previous rift s and Pico 4). 

Posted (edited)

Normandy 2 has better locations/size, but Channel has much better detail. The chalk cliffs on the UK side in Normandy 2 look absolutely horrendous with static shadows drawn onto them. 

Edited by Nealius
  • Like 2
Posted
On 5/31/2024 at 1:06 AM, Nealius said:

Normandy 2 has better locations/size, but Channel has much better detail. The chalk cliffs on the UK side in Normandy 2 look absolutely horrendous with static shadows drawn onto them. 

 

 

On 5/23/2024 at 5:17 PM, Qcumber said:

Normandy 2 is a better map overall. The level of detail is good on both maps but the performance is better for the N2 map. Ultimately, it depends on the area that is most important to you. 

seems to be a bit of a rivalry between the two. some say normandy 2 is better some say channel is better. 

Acer Predator Triton 700 || i7-7700HQ || 512GB SSD || 32GB RAM || GTX1080 Max-Q || FFB II and Thrustmaster TWCS Throttle || All DCS Modules

Posted
18 hours ago, Nealius said:

"It depends." Neither is objectively better. One is better than the other depending on personal priorities. 

well as stated in the topic thread, is refers to the graphical fidelity/technology specifically. i would feel like this is a more objective idea whether someone just likes it more or not. from what i gathered Normandy 2.0 is objectively newer and better technology across the map, but Channel has more detail specifically along the coastal areas since its a smaller map. but not 100% sure about this

Acer Predator Triton 700 || i7-7700HQ || 512GB SSD || 32GB RAM || GTX1080 Max-Q || FFB II and Thrustmaster TWCS Throttle || All DCS Modules

Posted
30 minutes ago, dresoccer4 said:

well as stated in the topic thread, is refers to the graphical fidelity/technology specifically. i would feel like this is a more objective idea whether someone just likes it more or not. from what i gathered Normandy 2.0 is objectively newer and better technology across the map, but Channel has more detail specifically along the coastal areas since its a smaller map. but not 100% sure about this

Which is why I said in the first reply that you should just trial the maps and find out yourself which one suits you more. 

  • Like 2
  • 4 months later...
Posted (edited)

Since I'm super confused now too. I consider the following options:

#1 DCS: The Channel (36,96€) + DCS: Normandy 2.0 upgrade (13,85€) -> 50,81€

or

#2 DCS: Normandy 2.0 (46,20€) + DCS: Channel (36,96€) -> 83,16€

 

Would option #1 provide both maps in full state, though for much less compared to buying the maps separately? If I choose option #1, in DCS will there be a dedicated "The Channel" and "Normandy" map to pick in e.g. the mission editor, or will there still be only "The Channel" to build missions?

Edited by lBlackMambal
Posted
30 minutes ago, lBlackMambal said:

Since I'm super confused now too. I consider the following options:

#1 DCS: The Channel (36,96€) + DCS: Normandy 2.0 upgrade (13,85€) -> 50,81€

or

#2 DCS: Normandy 2.0 (46,20€) + DCS: Channel (36,96€) -> 83,16€

 

Would option #1 provide both maps in full state, though for much less compared to buying the maps separately? If I choose option #1, in DCS will there be a dedicated "The Channel" and "Normandy" map to pick in e.g. the mission editor, or will there still be only "The Channel" to build missions?

 

Yes. They are fully individual maps. You get a discount on Normandie, if you own the Channel map. Maybe it's even applied if you get both at the same time. I owned both when Normandy 2.0 dropped. 

Posted
vor 40 Minuten schrieb MAXsenna:

Yes. They are fully individual maps. You get a discount on Normandie, if you own the Channel map. Maybe it's even applied if you get both at the same time. I owned both when Normandy 2.0 dropped. 

Thanks a lot for the reply.

So, if I buy "The Channel" + "Normandy 2.0 Upgrade" it would be the same as buying "The Channel" + "Normandy 2.0", right?

Posted

You need first former Normandy to be able to use 2.0 upgrade.

If you dont have Normandy base map you cant upgrade to 2.0 for that money.

So having Normandy just buy 2.0 upgrade and the Channel. 

If you dont have Normandy, you need the FULL PRICE Normandy 2.0 and the Channel

" You must think in russian.."

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´

 

Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4

Posted
6 minutes ago, Esac_mirmidon said:

You need first former Normandy to be able to use 2.0 upgrade.

No. You can still get the full N2 map for $14.99 if you own The Channel map. That's what I did. 

  • Like 1

9800x3d; rtx5080 FE; 64Gb RAM 6000MHz; 2Tb NVME; Quest Pro (previous rift s and Pico 4). 

Posted
vor 35 Minuten schrieb Qcumber:

No. You can still get the full N2 map for $14.99 if you own The Channel map. That's what I did. 

I see, even in 2024 there's still confusion 🙂

Qcumber, with this "Channel + Normandy 2.0 Upgrade", do you have HQ content all over the map?

I'm referring to this YT:clip (simply play with the linked starting time):

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, lBlackMambal said:

Qcumber, with this "Channel + Normandy 2.0 Upgrade", do you have HQ content all over the map?

Yes but there is less detail around East Kent than The Channel map as this is part of the overlap. UM appear to be adding more detail here though with more airfields etc. 

  • Like 1

9800x3d; rtx5080 FE; 64Gb RAM 6000MHz; 2Tb NVME; Quest Pro (previous rift s and Pico 4). 

Posted
vor 3 Stunden schrieb MAXsenna:

@Qcumber Is correct. 

@Esac_mirmidon Original Normandy is not for sale anymore.

@lBlackMambal Yes, correct. Get them both, or Channel first. 👍🏻

Alrighty, well, if there's no difference between buying each map on its own or upgrading "The Channel" with the "Normandy 2.0" I will then go for the upgrade path 🙂 Thanks a lot for the confirmation.

vor einer Stunde schrieb Qcumber:

Yes but there is less detail around East Kent than The Channel map as this is part of the overlap. UM appear to be adding more detail here though with more airfields etc. 

Thanks again for the reply. Ok, good to know. Can't wait to check out those maps - specifically since they come from the same company that created the awesome Syria map.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Sorry, didnt know the original Normandy was put out of the box.

Then just Channel + Normandy 2 upgrade

Edited by Esac_mirmidon
  • Like 1

" You must think in russian.."

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´

 

Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4

Posted
2 hours ago, lBlackMambal said:

Thanks again for the reply. Ok, good to know. Can't wait to check out those maps - specifically since they come from the same company that created the awesome Syria map.

N2 is a great map. Much better optimisation than The Channel and sounds like it will get better with the next update 🤞

  • Like 1

9800x3d; rtx5080 FE; 64Gb RAM 6000MHz; 2Tb NVME; Quest Pro (previous rift s and Pico 4). 

Posted

I have choosen the N2 map. But to be honest, didn't play it much recently. 😉

I bought the BF 109 K-4 after I have seen it in a museum and it looked quit interesting. For this I thought I should have an appropriate scenery... well.

________________________ ________ ______ ___ __ _

Win10 64 Pro, i7-6800K 3.4Ghz, 32 GB (DDR4), Asus Aorus 1080 TI WF, TrackIR 5 / RIFT, Thrustmaster Warthog, Fanatec Pedals, 55" oled 4k TV, Modules:A10C, KA-50, Huey, AV-8B, FA-18, F-16, NTTR, Persian Gulf

_ __ ___ ____ _____ ______ _______ ____________



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...