Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I haven't used the Mudhen yet, so I don't know what features are missing to finish-up the module, but if someone can say what is still missing, just to understand. I'm asking for real answers, not hyperbolas, so I'm not asking for criticism on the parts, as I have read enough of them and seen the videos, just the honest answer.

 

Thank you.

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, sniperpr1 said:

I haven't used the Mudhen yet, so I don't know what features are missing to finish-up the module, but if someone can say what is still missing, just to understand. I'm asking for real answers, not hyperbolas, so I'm not asking for criticism on the parts, as I have read enough of them and seen the videos, just the honest answer.

 

Thank you.

 

Posted

Apart from obvious bug fixes there're a lot of functions/MFD pages and weapons, ex. Mavs. This is if we stay in 90's. Razbam's plan was to add newer versions in the future with new TGPs (Litening, Sniper), JHMCS, 9X, new UFC and even more weapons.

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted (edited)

Despite what is happening, the jet is very effective in its current state and very fun to fly. Its actually one of the only jets I fly currently besides the F4E. I Really hope progress is made between ED and Razbam because it has so much potential to be the most badass piece of hardware in DCS. However, if it stayed the way it is and it just was kept functional I would still fly it. 

Edited by Moosemermaid
  • Like 13
Posted

I will definitely still fly the eagle even in its current state. One of the very best in flying characteristics, and a bunch of capabilities. Sure would be a huge bonus if further upgrades could be made.

  • Like 7
Posted

Same as everyone else says, even in its stalled state, it's a great plane.

 

Needs the GBU-28 Bunker McBuster to fulfill its role as a deep strike heavy hitter. 

 

 

  • Like 3

Some of the planes, but all of the maps!

Posted

Hi Folks. I'm out of DCS right now but want to check back how is the current situation for F-15E right now? I really liked what Razbam was doing.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
18 minutes ago, pepin1234 said:

Hi Folks. I'm out of DCS right now but want to check back how is the current situation for F-15E right now? I really liked what Razbam was doing.

Situation is unchanged. 

Posted
1 hour ago, pepin1234 said:

how is the current situation for F-15E

It's great, just flew a sortie :thumbup:

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted

IMO I would like improvements but I could still fly and fight

The F-15E is special bring the "deadpool" Skin back 🙂

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

LUCKY:pilotfly::joystick:

Computer Specs

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-Core 3.4 GHz| GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 6Gb | RAM: 32 GB DDR4 @ 3000 MHz | OS: Win 10 64 bit | HD: 500 Gb SSD

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Just a random list off the top of my head, limited to S4+ aside from the SWP, focusing on relevant features that's usually in the scope of DCS.

 

1.) UFC, TSD and nav functions are heavily unfinished. You don't have ToT, UFC look ahead point calculations on DATA 2, the mission navigator is WIP, you have no way to update the MN/INS using the target pod, the HUD or a flyover method, you have no way or need to update the system altitude and the TSD functions are basically all missing. You would have the ability to cue various sensors from the map, place avoidance points representing various threats, have a turn radius calculations show up depending on your ground speed and bank angle, a LOS tool and terrain shading for terrain masking and so on.

 

2.) The HUD is missing various features, like the small pipper, the range circle, dud, frag and MRA cues, the ability to directly activate the laser with the HUD in command, PSL steering on the HUD.

 

3.) Manual HAT and the missing ranging sources aren't implemented.

 

4.) Automatic landing guidance isn't implemented.

 

5.) Upgraded RWS tracks aren't implemented.

 

6.) No ICS, some missing TEWS symbology.

 

7.) JDAM fuze settings, untarget function, TOO function and patterns are all missing.

 

8.) Emergency fuel transfer and cyclic transfer logic isn't added yet either.

 

9.) No MAN FF/RET bombing modes.

 

10.) No BITs or BIT page.

 

11.) Missing cruise data on the engine page.

 

12.) Missing OWS matrix page and integration.

 

13.) Missing wind model page.

 

14.) Missing manual level and gain control for the target pod, missing AA mode.

Edited by Hatman335
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 3
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I had it.....loved it.....got pissed off with what happened and got a refund.....I really hope they can get their stuff together and Id buy it again in a heartbeat.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...