sniperpr1 Posted July 12, 2024 Posted July 12, 2024 I haven't used the Mudhen yet, so I don't know what features are missing to finish-up the module, but if someone can say what is still missing, just to understand. I'm asking for real answers, not hyperbolas, so I'm not asking for criticism on the parts, as I have read enough of them and seen the videos, just the honest answer. Thank you. 2
razo+r Posted July 12, 2024 Posted July 12, 2024 4 minutes ago, sniperpr1 said: I haven't used the Mudhen yet, so I don't know what features are missing to finish-up the module, but if someone can say what is still missing, just to understand. I'm asking for real answers, not hyperbolas, so I'm not asking for criticism on the parts, as I have read enough of them and seen the videos, just the honest answer. Thank you.
RaisedByWolves Posted July 13, 2024 Posted July 13, 2024 Well. Many. And it’s not even guaranteed that it will change anytime soon, or ever. 1
draconus Posted July 18, 2024 Posted July 18, 2024 Apart from obvious bug fixes there're a lot of functions/MFD pages and weapons, ex. Mavs. This is if we stay in 90's. Razbam's plan was to add newer versions in the future with new TGPs (Litening, Sniper), JHMCS, 9X, new UFC and even more weapons. Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Moosemermaid Posted July 18, 2024 Posted July 18, 2024 (edited) Despite what is happening, the jet is very effective in its current state and very fun to fly. Its actually one of the only jets I fly currently besides the F4E. I Really hope progress is made between ED and Razbam because it has so much potential to be the most badass piece of hardware in DCS. However, if it stayed the way it is and it just was kept functional I would still fly it. Edited July 18, 2024 by Moosemermaid 13
Avio Posted July 19, 2024 Posted July 19, 2024 I will definitely still fly the eagle even in its current state. One of the very best in flying characteristics, and a bunch of capabilities. Sure would be a huge bonus if further upgrades could be made. 7
Beirut Posted July 25, 2024 Posted July 25, 2024 Same as everyone else says, even in its stalled state, it's a great plane. Needs the GBU-28 Bunker McBuster to fulfill its role as a deep strike heavy hitter. 3 Some of the planes, but all of the maps!
sniperpr1 Posted July 26, 2024 Author Posted July 26, 2024 Thanks to all that commented, just the facts. Thank you
pepin1234 Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 Hi Folks. I'm out of DCS right now but want to check back how is the current situation for F-15E right now? I really liked what Razbam was doing. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
razo+r Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 18 minutes ago, pepin1234 said: Hi Folks. I'm out of DCS right now but want to check back how is the current situation for F-15E right now? I really liked what Razbam was doing. Situation is unchanged.
draconus Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 1 hour ago, pepin1234 said: how is the current situation for F-15E It's great, just flew a sortie Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
ruddy122 Posted July 29, 2024 Posted July 29, 2024 IMO I would like improvements but I could still fly and fight The F-15E is special bring the "deadpool" Skin back [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] LUCKY:pilotfly::joystick: Computer Specs CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-Core 3.4 GHz| GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 6Gb | RAM: 32 GB DDR4 @ 3000 MHz | OS: Win 10 64 bit | HD: 500 Gb SSD
afnav130 Posted August 10, 2024 Posted August 10, 2024 JTIDS, SIT, ToT, TSD improvements, plus a lot more. 1
Hatman335 Posted August 11, 2024 Posted August 11, 2024 (edited) Just a random list off the top of my head, limited to S4+ aside from the SWP, focusing on relevant features that's usually in the scope of DCS. 1.) UFC, TSD and nav functions are heavily unfinished. You don't have ToT, UFC look ahead point calculations on DATA 2, the mission navigator is WIP, you have no way to update the MN/INS using the target pod, the HUD or a flyover method, you have no way or need to update the system altitude and the TSD functions are basically all missing. You would have the ability to cue various sensors from the map, place avoidance points representing various threats, have a turn radius calculations show up depending on your ground speed and bank angle, a LOS tool and terrain shading for terrain masking and so on. 2.) The HUD is missing various features, like the small pipper, the range circle, dud, frag and MRA cues, the ability to directly activate the laser with the HUD in command, PSL steering on the HUD. 3.) Manual HAT and the missing ranging sources aren't implemented. 4.) Automatic landing guidance isn't implemented. 5.) Upgraded RWS tracks aren't implemented. 6.) No ICS, some missing TEWS symbology. 7.) JDAM fuze settings, untarget function, TOO function and patterns are all missing. 8.) Emergency fuel transfer and cyclic transfer logic isn't added yet either. 9.) No MAN FF/RET bombing modes. 10.) No BITs or BIT page. 11.) Missing cruise data on the engine page. 12.) Missing OWS matrix page and integration. 13.) Missing wind model page. 14.) Missing manual level and gain control for the target pod, missing AA mode. Edited August 11, 2024 by Hatman335 5 3
rwbishUP Posted August 25, 2024 Posted August 25, 2024 If you expected to get the module that you paid for...............you expected too much. 4 2 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, ROG ASTRAL RTX5080, G.SKILL TRI Z5 64gb, 4tb M.2 x 2, WIN 11 PRO x64
badger7966 Posted December 5, 2024 Posted December 5, 2024 I had it.....loved it.....got pissed off with what happened and got a refund.....I really hope they can get their stuff together and Id buy it again in a heartbeat. 1
Recommended Posts