Jump to content

The MIG-29A is brilliant! Congratulations Eagle Dynamics to a great release!


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, RyanR said:

It's amazing how "primitive" the avionics are..... which makes the module that much more interesting.

The "4th generation" nomenclature is more of a Western PR move anyway, but if you follow that logic you could make an argument about 9-12A being more of a 3.5gen fighter. Think of it as a stepping stone, an F-4 on steroids basically more in line with an F-14 (or early F-15A) than F-15C/16/18.
This and a FFD Su-27 are probably my most anticipated modules (fixed wing anyway) of all time, and I am elated we have one in DCS atm. 

  • Like 4
Spoiler

Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with 20cm S-curve extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
Win11 Pro 24H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON

 

Posted

I’ve wanted a proper Mig-29 module in DCS for a long time. It feels great, cockpit looks great, it sounds great. It’s probably so far for me the most impressive DCS module release. I’m very pleased with it. 

  • Like 4

harrier landing GIFRYZEN 7 3700X Running at 4.35 GHz

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti

32gb DDR4 RAM @3200 MHz

Oculus CV1 NvME 970 EVO

TM Warthog Stick & Throttle plus 11" extension. VKB T-Rudder MKIV

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

This mod has great potential.  Unfortunately it has some constant crash issues with Pimax Play resulting in game crashing to desk top. I have researched and tried numerous ways to comply with the online system crash advice, but nothing seems to work. Trying the old open XR and Pimax play start options initially start off fine, but then almost at the exact same spot taxiing from a cold start the sim crashes. It is very frustrating, especially considering the amount of time I have dedicated to learning this module. As far as my rig, I am operating a Cyber Power   Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900K, 3200 Mhz, 24 Core(s), 32 Logical Processor(s), with Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090.  So handling this module and DCS should be no problem.  These crashes only happen with this MiG-29A module.  Something is wrong with this module and Pimax Play.

Anyone else having these issues?

 

 

  • ED Team
Posted
6 minutes ago, gwizairshows said:

This mod has great potential.  Unfortunately it has some constant crash issues with Pimax Play resulting in game crashing to desk top. I have researched and tried numerous ways to comply with the online system crash advice, but nothing seems to work. Trying the old open XR and Pimax play start options initially start off fine, but then almost at the exact same spot taxiing from a cold start the sim crashes. It is very frustrating, especially considering the amount of time I have dedicated to learning this module. As far as my rig, I am operating a Cyber Power   Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900K, 3200 Mhz, 24 Core(s), 32 Logical Processor(s), with Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090.  So handling this module and DCS should be no problem.  These crashes only happen with this MiG-29A module.  Something is wrong with this module and Pimax Play.

Anyone else having these issues?

 

 

It would be better to start your own thread in the Bugs and Problems section with crash logs and such. Thanks

  • Like 1

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Posted

Hi Guys (and ED),

I would like to second OP and praise the MiG-29A Fulcrum module. The module is fun as hell and quite nice to operate and employ. I already made and published my usual “Quick Checklist” and even made a mini-campaign.

To make it short, the module is awesome. Congratulations.

All the best,

Sydy

  • Like 6
  • ED Team
Posted
1 minute ago, Sydy said:

Hi Guys (and ED),

I would like to second OP and praise the MiG-29A Fulcrum module. The module is fun as hell and quite nice to operate and employ. I already made and published my usual “Quick Checklist” and even made a mini-campaign.

To make it short, the module is awesome. Congratulations.

All the best,

Sydy

Thank you for your kind words Sydy, we appreciate it. 

 

  • Like 2

smallCATPILOT.PNG.04bbece1b27ff1b2c193b174ec410fc0.PNG

Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status

Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal

Posted
On 9/19/2025 at 11:22 PM, Raven (Elysian Angel) said:

The "4th generation" nomenclature is more of a Western PR move anyway, but if you follow that logic you could make an argument about 9-12A being more of a 3.5gen fighter. Think of it as a stepping stone, an F-4 on steroids basically more in line with an F-14 (or early F-15A) than F-15C/16/18.

MiG-29 is a proper, albeit no-frills, 4th generation fighter. Far superior to the Phantom is every aspect except air to ground. It's comparable to the F-16A in many regards, not necessarily to contemporary heavy fighters like the F-15A. The US modules that we have are called generation 4+.

Posted
7 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said:

MiG-29 is a proper, albeit no-frills, 4th generation fighter. Far superior to the Phantom is every aspect except air to ground. It's comparable to the F-16A in many regards, not necessarily to contemporary heavy fighters like the F-15A. The US modules that we have are called generation 4+.

Didn't 16A have only fox 2?

29 has DL, fox 1, HMS, 2 engines... IMHO it beats the 16A version in almost everything except RWR maybe

  • Like 1

i5-4690K CPU 3.50Ghz @ 4.10GHz; 32GB DDR3 1600MHz; GeForce GTX 1660 Super; LG IPS225@1920x1080; Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB; Windows 10 Pro

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Pavlin_33 said:

Didn't 16A have only fox 2?

29 has DL, fox 1, HMS, 2 engines... IMHO it beats the 16A version in almost everything except RWR maybe

No.

Maybe the first one, but with block 15 it could carry sparrows and amrams after ADF modifications and MLU upgrades later. 

But yes, MiG-29A was superior platform when compared to very first F-16A variants (without amrams).

Edited by Dača
Posted
1 minute ago, Dača said:

No.

Maybe the first one, but with block 15 it could carry sparrows and amrams after ADF modifications and MLU upgrades later. 

But yes, MiG-29A was superior platform when compared to very first F-16A variants (without amrams).

Ah I see. I didn't know they carried fox3 also.

i5-4690K CPU 3.50Ghz @ 4.10GHz; 32GB DDR3 1600MHz; GeForce GTX 1660 Super; LG IPS225@1920x1080; Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB; Windows 10 Pro

Posted
19 minutes ago, Pavlin_33 said:

Ah I see. I didn't know they carried fox3 also.

A bit later varians of F-16A. Block 15 and later did.

Posted

No, Block 15 MLU did, and only in foreign service. The MLU package gave them avionics and cockpit similar to F-16C. Stock Block 15 was heaters only, it was the last F-16A. Sparrows were only on a single ANG variant (either Block 15 or 30, I'm not sure), no other Viper carried them.

1 hour ago, Pavlin_33 said:

Didn't 16A have only fox 2?

29 has DL, fox 1, HMS, 2 engines... IMHO it beats the 16A version in almost everything except RWR maybe

It's still the same generation, and very similar role, that of a lightweight, short range, low cost dogfighter. And you're forgetting one extremely important feature of the Viper: the FBW system. It had a better RWR, sure, but the big deal was its novel control system. It would have been a particularly good match for our MiG-29, at least if it survived to the merge.

  • Like 2
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...