T-2 Buckeye, T-38 Talon and Su25-UTG

[Zeagle]

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

[sirrah]

Who do you mean by "we"? 

 

Just in case you had the illusion to speak on behalf of the entire community: I certainly do not "need" any trainer module in DCS.

[Rudel_chw]

4 hours ago, Zeagle said:

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

 

There are two community Mods for the T-38 currently in development:

 

 

 

 

[AeriaGloria]

5 hours ago, Zeagle said:

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

I don’t think UTG supported any armament

[Silver_Dragon]

6 hours ago, Zeagle said:

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

Remember the C-101EB (1980), L-39ZA/ZO (1976/1978), MB-339A (1979) has cold war trainers and L-39 was the main Red (Warsaw pact) trainer on the Cold War. About a T-2 (UsNavy) (1958) and T-38 (USAF) (1961) missing only about as USA trainers.

[Zeagle]

21 hours ago, sirrah said:

Who do you mean by "we"? 

 

Just in case you had the illusion to speak on behalf of the entire community: I certainly do not "need" any trainer module in DCS.

Some of us come from real world aviation. We love to fly. Period. It's not about a game.   

Maybe you should read the rules for this section before posting.

20 hours ago, Silver_Dragon said:

Remember the C-101EB (1980), L-39ZA/ZO (1976/1978), MB-339A (1979) has cold war trainers and L-39 was the main Red (Warsaw pact) trainer on the Cold War. About a T-2 (UsNavy) (1958) and T-38 (USAF) (1961) missing only about as USA trainers.

You are absolutely correct Dragon. I just want a T-2 for historical and sentimental reasons. As for the Su25, maybe ED can find the means to do a full fidelity module one day before I am too old to fly it.

[Zeagle]

20 hours ago, AeriaGloria said:

I don’t think UTG supported any armament

I don't actually know. It would just be cool to have a naval Su25.  Maybe one day.

[AeriaGloria]

Like it doesn’t have a laser. And all pictures show it’s 4 pylons only used for fuel tanks 

[Zeagle]

Well it only had fuel tanks because it was used in initial carrier trials. They don't usually put weapons on for that. That comes later. 

[sirrah]

1 hour ago, Zeagle said:

Some of us come from real world aviation. We love to fly. Period. It's not about a game.   

Maybe you should read the rules for this section before posting.

In your OP you said "we need cold war trainers"

I responded that perhaps you meant to say that "you" wish for additional trainers.

I (and many community members with me) don't need any more cold war trainers in DCS and rather see the effort spend elsewhere.

No forum rules broken as far as I can tell.

Good luck with your wish mate