Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Since we have a hamburger MiG-29, this is only a fair request 😉 

  • Like 2
Spoiler

Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
Win11 Pro 25H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON

 

Posted (edited)

 

Quote

Since we have a hamburger MiG-29, this is only a fair request 😉 

Or they could just make the MiG-29 work like every other Soviet/Russian aircraft, where the instruments are Metric, like in reality, regardless of whether you have Metric or Imperial checked in the main settings, and no matter what language one chooses for labelling or annunciator panels.

Edited by Ornithopter
  • Like 3
Posted
Just now, Ornithopter said:

Or they could just make the MiG-29 work like every other Soviet/Russian aircraft, where the instruments are Metric, like in reality, regardless of whether you have Metric or Imperial checked in the main settings, and no matter what language one chooses for labelling or annunciator panels.

I agree, but once the toothpaste is outside of the tube, you can’t push it back in.

  • Like 3
Spoiler

Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
Win11 Pro 25H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON

 

Posted

I mean Saudi Arabia had Cs as well as Israel, so maybe they stayed Imperial, or if not, then it's kinda valid request.

'Nearly everyone felt the need to express their views on all wars to me, starting with mine. I found myself thinking, “I ate the crap sandwich, you didn’t, so please don’t tell me how it tastes.”' - CPT Cole, US Army
 
 

DCS Sig.jpg

Posted
12 minutes ago, EricJ said:

I mean Saudi Arabia had Cs as well as Israel, so maybe they stayed Imperial, or if not, then it's kinda valid request.

Of course those F15s kept their original units of measure. With a very few exceptions like the former USSR, everyone uses feet, knots and nautical miles in aviation. 

  • Like 4
Posted
22 часа назад, EricJ сказал:

I mean Saudi Arabia had Cs as well as Israel, so maybe they stayed Imperial, or if not, then it's kinda valid request.

It's more about an optional usage of the convenient system that would affect only the user who is willing to use metric in his cockpit

Posted
3 minutes ago, TotenDead said:

It's more about an optional usage of the convenient system that would affect only the user who is willing to use metric in his cockpit

Yeah later models had that option if I read it right, but understood

'Nearly everyone felt the need to express their views on all wars to me, starting with mine. I found myself thinking, “I ate the crap sandwich, you didn’t, so please don’t tell me how it tastes.”' - CPT Cole, US Army
 
 

DCS Sig.jpg

Posted

German and Poland have used MiG29 in English/Imperial and that is the reason MiG29 could be considered metric/imperial. 

If some of you provide thr proof that F-15C MSIP was ever used in metric then this request makes sense. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

Quote

German and Poland have used MiG29 in English/Imperial and that is the reason MiG29 could be considered metric/imperial. 

If some of you provide thr proof that F-15C MSIP was ever used in metric then this request makes sense. 

There are Real world MiG-29s in Poland or Germany that actually had instruments measuring feet and knots?  Are you sure about that, or have a source?

I assumed that the Frankencockpit version of the DCS MiG-29 was meant as just a video game convenience, for those who would prefer Imperial, but didn't actually represent any real life conversion.

Edited by Ornithopter
Posted
22 minutes ago, Ornithopter said:

 

There are Real world MiG-29s in Poland or Germany that actually had instruments measuring feet and knots?  Are you sure about that, or have a source?

I assumed that the Frankencockpit version of the DCS MiG-29 was meant as just a video game convenience, for those who would prefer Imperial, but didn't actually represent any real life conversion.

After conversion, yes, even English description. They had to adapt to NATO standards. The same thing happened with the MiG-29s in Germany, which later adopted the "G" designation.

Polski_mig_29_kokpit.JPG

  • Like 2

Webmaster of http://www.yoyosims.pl

Yoyosimsbanner.gif

Win 10 64, i9-13900 KF, RTX  5090 32Gb OC, RAM 64Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3600MHz,, 3xSSD+3xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

Posted
On 10/25/2025 at 4:40 PM, TotenDead said:

Could you please make a metric version of the F-15 for those who don't use freedom units? 

Let's not be silly. ;>

  • Like 1

Webmaster of http://www.yoyosims.pl

Yoyosimsbanner.gif

Win 10 64, i9-13900 KF, RTX  5090 32Gb OC, RAM 64Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3600MHz,, 3xSSD+3xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

Posted
5 hours ago, YoYo said:

After conversion, yes, even English description. They had to adapt to NATO standards. The same thing happened with the MiG-29s in Germany, which later adopted the "G" designation.

Polski_mig_29_kokpit.JPG

Wow, I didn't know they had actually converted the instruments in real life.  Thanks!

Posted
9 часов назад, YoYo сказал:

After conversion, yes, even English description. They had to adapt to NATO standards. The same thing happened with the MiG-29s in Germany, which later adopted the "G" designation.

 

That's not the 9.12A we have in the game though 

 

9 часов назад, YoYo сказал:

Let's not be silly. ;>

What did you find silly? Would an optional metric cockpit hurt your gameplay somehow

11 часов назад, Mateo сказал:

German and Poland have used MiG29 in English/Imperial and that is the reason MiG29 could be considered metric/imperial. 

 

Like I said those aren't 9.12A we have in the game

10 часов назад, Ornithopter сказал:

I assumed that the Frankencockpit version of the DCS MiG-29 was meant as just a video game convenience, for those who would prefer Imperial, but didn't actually represent any real life conversion.

Actually, you were right. Same goes for the Ka-50 cockpit, for example

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, TotenDead said:

That's not the 9.12A we have in the game though 

What did you find silly? Would an optional metric cockpit hurt your gameplay somehow

1/ This is 9.12A version, early MiG. This version we have as FF module. To be precise, this is version „9.12A” and „9.12A after modification”, and that is how it should be considered, so we have two versions. The modified version (local work) had no other name, so it is still 9.12A, with the exception of German MiGs.

2/ For me, there shouldn't even be a version with imperial gauges for the MiG. This complicates matters considerably, as you can see. Besides, people should learn other systems, not take the easy way out of laziness. In this case, I can still understand it, because the MiG did indeed have a cockpit with gauges in feet and in the Imperial version, but the F-15C didn't, which is why it's stupid. So, no, even as option. It's better to be more ambitious.

Edited by YoYo
  • Like 1

Webmaster of http://www.yoyosims.pl

Yoyosimsbanner.gif

Win 10 64, i9-13900 KF, RTX  5090 32Gb OC, RAM 64Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3600MHz,, 3xSSD+3xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

Posted
9 часов назад, YoYo сказал:

2/ For me, there shouldn't even be a version with imperial gauges for the MiG. This complicates matters considerably, as you can see. Besides, people should learn other systems, not take the easy way out of laziness.

I see. There are many people who use imperial in it though

9 часов назад, YoYo сказал:

In this case, I can still understand it, because the MiG did indeed have a cockpit with gauges in feet and in the Imperial version, but the F-15C didn't, which is why it's stupid. So, no, even as option. It's better to be more ambitious.

Our MiG had never had an instrument panel in imperial, neither had it english cockpit. So, its situation is very similar to the F-15C, but anyway, I understood your position. Mine is - optional ability never hurts unless it spoils gameplay for others. Metric in my cockpit won't hurt anyone 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 11/2/2025 at 8:37 AM, YoYo said:

2/ For me, there shouldn't even be a version with imperial gauges for the MiG. This complicates matters considerably, as you can see. Besides, people should learn other systems, not take the easy way out of laziness.

Exactly. As said earlier: we finally have a nice little RedFor jet and the first thing people do is turn it into a BluFor one 🙄
The only convenience option that should have been present is the same ones we already have for other RedFor modules: english cockpit labels and english Rita - for those of us who didn't grow up with Cyrillic.
A metric F-15C is equally silly IMO, but if ED gives us a 'BigMac MiG-29' they should also give us a 'Tovarich F-15C'.

The best option would of course be to simply remove the imperial MiG-29 options, forget about them and never mention them again. It's begging for bugs and opens the door for ever more silliness.
Seriously, if we can learn imperial then the yanks can learn metric too...

Edited by Raven (Elysian Angel)
Grammar
  • Like 1
Spoiler

Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
Win11 Pro 25H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON

 

Posted
18 hours ago, TotenDead said:

I see. There are many people who use imperial in it though

Our MiG had never had an instrument panel in imperial, neither had it english cockpit. So, its situation is very similar to the F-15C, but anyway, I understood your position. Mine is - optional ability never hurts unless it spoils gameplay for others. Metric in my cockpit won't hurt anyone 

At least a MiG-29 variant of some kind has been equipped with an Imperial unit cockpit with English or a Cyrillic language cockpit. What you're asking for does not exist and never did exist in any form, especially on the F-15C they're modelling.

  • Thanks 1

Discord: @dsplayer

Setup: R7 7800X3D, 64GB 6000Mhz, Saitek/Logitech X56 HOTAS, TrackIR + TrackClipPro

Resources I've Made: F-4E RWR PRF Sound Player | DCS DTC Web Editor

Mods I've Made: F-14 Factory Clean Cockpit Mod | Modern F-14 Weapons Mod | Iranian F-14 Weapons Pack | F-14B Nozzle Percentage Mod + Label Fix | AIM-23 Hawk Mod for F-14 

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...