Laud Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 But that's an quite old one... 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200 Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD) TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5
hog_driver111th Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 But that's an quite old one... I thought the same, but had heard that due to some of the classified nature of the superhornet, it would be easier to make the Legacy Hornet. A-10C - FC3 - CA - L-39 - UH1 - P-51 - Hawk - BS2 - F-86 - Gazelle - F-5E - AV8B - F/A-18C i5-4590 - GTX 1060 - Oculus CV1 - TM:Warthog [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic9979_1.gif[/sIGPIC]
ALDEGA Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Domain name: F-18C.COM Creation Date: 2011.03.21 Updated Date: 2011.03.30 Expiration Date: 2012.03.21 Registrant ID: 3SAULC7-RU Registrant Name: Joint Stock Company “Eagle Dynamics” Registrant Street: 3, Avangardnaya str. Registrant City: Moscow Registrant Country: RU Contact Phone: +7 495 6458770 Contact E-mail: const@eagle.ruMost intriguing.
Dimebag Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Dagnabbit, i want to know! :wallbash: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Find us at http://virtual-roulettes.forumotion.com/
Laud Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 I thought the same, but had heard that due to some of the classified nature of the superhornet, it would be easier to make the Legacy Hornet. Sorry, I meant the fact that they registered that domain! ;) 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200 Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD) TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5
Isegrim Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Gripen ?!:renske: How about the Swedish Multirole Jet? 1 "Blyat Naaaaa" - Izlom
topol-m Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 404 pages in a thread with a poll containing 4 aircraft non of which will be the next DCS module?!! :doh: :doh: :doh: 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Ghillied raptor Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 404 pages in a thread with a poll containing 4 aircraft non of which will be the next DCS module?!! :doh: :doh: :doh: You don't know that!:mad: 1
topol-m Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 You don't know that!:mad: Oh I do know that, 3 of them are quite new with a lot of their systems still secret, the last one is no longer in service. Now if we are talking F/A-18C that's different but don't expect to see E/F much less F-22 and F-35 in the next and after the next DCS module. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
joey45 Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 ^^ people just don't know anymore what ED can and can't do. 1 The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
Pilotasso Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 you guys will probably facepalm when ED finally says which plane will be.:) Chances are the info is perfectly in line what has been shown in these forums for years. .
Phantom88 Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Oh I do know that, 3 of them are quite new with a lot of their systems still secret, the last one is no longer in service. Now if we are talking F/A-18C that's different but don't expect to see E/F much less F-22 and F-35 in the next and after the next DCS module. You do know that DCS Producer/Developer Matt Wagner was a main contributor to the award winning EA Jane's F/A-18E SuperHornet Study Sim more than 10 yrs ago.Right?? Just like the A-10C with some things still classified that we do not see in sim,It doesn't mean DCS can't produce a Highly accurate, High Fidelity representation of The SuperHornet. Patrick
EtherealN Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 It doesn't mean DCS can't produce a Highly accurate, High Fidelity representation of The SuperHornet. The relevant question would be: is ED able to produce a representation that is sufficiently high fidelity for what they want to do? Just doing the same thing somoene else already did (or, in the case of Matt personally, what he himself already did!) might not be thrilling... :P Don't make too much out of something as simple as a registered domain. :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
Divide Et Impera Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Pleaaaaaase anything Multi-role [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic86251_7.gif[/sIGPIC]
Phantom88 Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 ^^^Oh come On^^^ What could be more thrilling than doing the SuperHornet??? Putting a F/A-18 E[or F] down on a Rolling/Pitching deck of an Nimitz class AircraftCarrier??? ...........That's Thrilling!!!;) Patrick
joey45 Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 ^^ depends how accute they can do it.. no info means no airframe. Simple. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
topol-m Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Just like the A-10C with some things still classified that we do not see in sim,It doesn't mean DCS can't produce a Highly accurate, High Fidelity representation of The SuperHornet. The difference is while just small amount of A-10C's systems were left out if there is DCS Super Hornet one big part of its systems (particularly radar modes and functionality and EW systems) would be left out which would mean you can forget about "high fidelity". Mind that I'm not saying there won't be DCS Super Hornet ever, I'm just 99% certain it won't be the next DCS module, which is what this thread is all about. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Slayer Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 DCS: Eurofighter please. To heck with the pole...... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] System Specs Intel I7-3930K, Asrock EXTREME9, EVGA TITAN, Mushkin Chronos SSD, 16GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z series 2133, TM Warthog and MFD's, Saitek Proflight Combat pedals, TrackIR 5 + TrackClip PRO, Windows 7 x64, 3-Asus VS2248H-P monitors, Thermaltake Level 10 GT, Obutto cockpit
Ghillied raptor Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Oh I do know that, 3 of them are quite new with a lot of their systems still secret, the last one is no longer in service. Now if we are talking F/A-18C that's different but don't expect to see E/F much less F-22 and F-35 in the next and after the next DCS module. F/A-18 C, you say? I'm not the picky sort, I'll take it :P
Phantom88 Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 F/A-18 C, you say? I'm not the picky sort, I'll take it :P Agreed!:thumbup: I'll be Happy with a Legacy or SuperHornet,but the possibility of Carrier Ops would be a HUGE Addition to the Sim IMHO. 1 Patrick
Eddie Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Also, to stir the pot a little bit, the Eurofighter, Rafale, and the Gripen are all the same airplane as far as I'm concerned. Muahahahahahahah!! :devil_2: Yep, and the MQ-1 and MQ-9 are the same aircraft as well, they just put the tail plane on upside down.
EtherealN Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Don't feed the troll. :P But sure, they all have canards, so it's like MQ-9 and the Kettering Bug - both have straight wings so same thing. :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
Eddie Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Don't feed the troll. :P But sure, they all have canards, so it's like MQ-9 and the Kettering Bug - both have straight wings so same thing. :D Typhoon doesn't have canards. :D
EtherealN Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Yes it does. :P Control-canard, same as Gripen and Rafale. ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
Eddie Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 No it doesn't, but it does have a foreplane. A foreplane controls pitch, whereas canards control both pitch and roll.
Recommended Posts