Next DCS (US) Fixed Wing Aircraft Wish List

[Laud]

But the same goes for the dutch and their F-35 contract.

 

Those who signed that might have also been given a fair amount of $. ;)

[L0op8ack]

My wish

Emmm....

 

DCS: World Of Tank

DCS: Footman

DCS: SAM

DCS: Submarine

 

and so on

[Gaanalma]

My wish

Emmm....

 

DCS: World Of Tank

DCS: Footman

DCS: SAM

DCS: Submarine

 

and so on

 

DCS: AWACS

DCS: Tower

DCS: SEOW

DCS: ecc..

[RIPTIDE]

I want DCS: Eddie.

[VTJS17_Fire]

I want DCS: Eddie.

 

Which version modelled? :D

 

 

kind regards,

Fire

[Eddie]

I want DCS: Eddie.

 

Ok, well, that's disturbing in at least 5 different ways.

 

:helpsmilie:

[Squid]

for the naval operations & Tomcat daydreamers Thirdwire made public its name, "Strike Fighters 2 North Atlantic" http://twitpic.com/7j7bu0

[Grimes]

but just because it's Swedish! I give myself an allowance of nationalism in two cases only: jets and Starcraft. :D

 

Another test¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :music_whistling:

 

I'll just be glad if the next DCS aircraft is used by several countries... and not just 1 like the A-10C and the Ka-50. Not that fictional skins or the breaking of realism bothers me, but it would just be something nice to have in the sim.

[ZQuickSilverZ]

Have you tried to see if you can get your SR71 thirst quenched in FSX ?

 

 

Yes I have. I found the cockpit to be very lacking. I also was not happy with the wind dynamic of the aircraft. I think in real life if your cruising mach 3.2 you should feel it. It should not just cruise along like a cessna.

 

Thank you for the idea though.

 

X-Plane maybe?

[Squid]

X-Plane probably is better in some terms like this, not sure, but its graphics inferiority (although not bad) that kept me off and relatively less friendly interface

[Phantom88]

I can never get a true sense of pure speed in FSX,Not like I feel in DCS.I can't wait for the next fast mover:thumbup:

[ZQuickSilverZ]

I don't know Squid to me X-Plane actually looks really good. I am not going to say that it is better than FSX but, I will say the graphics appeal to ME more. The land just seems a lot more organic. Your right about X-Planes interface though. It is HORRIBLE, and thats coming from a fan.

 

I am going to make a thread in the OTHER SIMS area (to keep from going too off topic). Please read it Squid (or other X-Plane users) because I have questions.

 

OK back ON topic (sorry about that). I was thinking about VATSIM. It is my understanding VATSIM makes FSX and X-Plane 9 (two seperate games, two seperate engines) semi online compatible. Would it be possible to do that with say DCS and a Ground Warfare simulator (two seperate games, two seperate engines) using statistical data sharing? The system would look at the kill to death ratio of two or more clans in real time. Then it would auto generate forces based on statistics for the next spawn cycle. This would create a sort of dynamic campaign. You guys think this might be doable or fun?

 

Hows that for a wish (pretty out there right)?

Edited November 27, 2011 by ZQuickSilverZ

[JECAF9]

My one wish, it goes fast. That's about it. Carrier ops would be fun too. As would most aircraft. (AT-802U), aaaaaaaah yeah. :)

[Migow]

SU 24 m sim

 

is the su24m or m2 still classified?

i would like to fly with this plane:)

http://youtu.be/2bZlK_-_eWM

http://youtu.be/fErf5ZPmKhs

[Polar-eX]

Realistic carries ops will do. Would be fun with a multirole like Fa-18

[Squid]

I don't know Squid to me X-Plane actually looks really good. I am not going to say that it is better than FSX but, I will say the graphics appeal to ME more. The land just seems a lot more organic. Your right about X-Planes interface though. It is HORRIBLE, and thats coming from a fan.

 

I am going to make a thread in the OTHER SIMS area (to keep from going too off topic). Please read it Squid (or other X-Plane users) because I have questions.

 

OK back ON topic (sorry about that). I was thinking about VATSIM. It is my understanding VATSIM makes FSX and X-Plane 9 (two seperate games, two seperate engines) semi online compatible. Would it be possible to do that with say DCS and a Ground Warfare simulator (two seperate games, two seperate engines) using statistical data sharing? The system would look at the kill to death ratio of two or more clans in real time. Then it would auto generate forces based on statistics for the next spawn cycle. This would create a sort of dynamic campaign. You guys think this might be doable or fun?

 

Hows that for a wish (pretty out there right)?

 

i have actually zero X-plane experience :(

 

does Combined arms maybe get a bit close to what you describe, just for starters maybe, who knows how it will evolve http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=81589

[plumber]

Realistic carries ops will do. Would be fun with a multirole like Fa-18

 

Yes, for sure. I remember in ATF all 4 of my friends would take off, marshal together, go out and execute the mission and land back on the carrier. It was amazing! I thought the graphics were good back then... lol, Soooo much better now!

[plumber]

I think, apart from the challenge of t/o & landings on a carrier, the main advantage of a carrier borne aircraft would be the massive area of the theatre (the whole Black Sea) that would be opened up for use. Having such a large area of Sea available to sit your carrier would allow for a larger number of realistic scenarios as you wouldn't always have to use the few bases in Georgia, or even involve Georgia in the scenario at all.

 

As for the Hornet, I agree entirely, with the caveat that I do still have a sadistic desire to fly it and adapt to it's many short falls.

 

For sure It's the challenge of getting off the carrier, doing the mission and landing the jet safely that turns me on!

[plumber]

if you mirror the quote vertically , distance your self to 23 cm from monitor and try to focus on infinite you will see it shaping with lockheed martin logo uppercase font :D

 

Wow, I see it now! Thanks Squid!

[plumber]

Well we've all pretty much reached a consensus that it won't and would be incredibly stupid for ED to do an F-16 sim since you can go play Falcon 4 if you want that. Why waste their time doing another one?

 

I consider it a vastly overrated airframe, don't know why it's painted as such a Hollywood superstar by the sim world...

 

But the fidelity and modeling of the F-16 would be much better, and let's not forget "The Bubble Canopy!- Riding on the tip of the pencil!"

[july865]

POLL - what a/c would you like ED to release

 

i will wait for a week and ask another poll question with the top 2 winners carried over to new poll with new selections added.

.

1. F18

2. F16

3. F14

4. SU 27

5. Mig 29

6. AH 64

[Evil.Bonsai]

this looks...familiar.

[KillarZ]

You should have added the F-15 even though I like the horrnet its a good way to see what the majority of people would prefer so please dont close this thread but you need to add the F-15

[Karon]

this looks...familiar.

Indeed.. ;)

http://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=147

[Squid]

hmmm moved back here? lol mods had enough of this ? :D