Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Okay I shoot: could it be a next DCS module? :detective:

 

We'll see in the process.. if it gets too complicated, it probably will.

 

Intel i7 12700k / Corsair H150i Elite Capellix / Asus TUF Z690 Wifi D4 / Corsair Dominator 32GB 3200Mhz / Corsair HW1000W / 1x Samsung SSD 970 Evo Plus 500Gb + 1 Corsair MP600 1TB / ASUS ROG Strix RTX 3080 OC V2 / Fractal Design Meshify 2 / HOTAS Warthog / TFRP Rudder / TrackIR 5 / Dell U2515h 25" Monitor 1440p

Posted

IIRC this model was announced in the same time as the ED hi poly Su-27 and MiG-29.

 

It was like 4 years ago, long before any of the DCS modules.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)

That hook exists solely for me to snap it off while attempting to land on the Carl Vinson. DCS: F-16 would not be complete without it. As far as proof goes, the model only proves that ED wanted to make an F-16 model for some reason. It doesn't prove anything about what that reason might be. What if ED had a military contract they were not allowed to make a module on? (well we probably wouldnt even see the model...)

 

Anyway, here is at least one possible reason.

Edited by VincentLaw

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

Well don't go by that website Vincent, it's all for The Battle Simulator, and the only way to get your hands on that is to join the military.

i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10

 

"There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement.

You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. "

Posted
Well don't go by that website Vincent, it's all for The Battle Simulator, and the only way to get your hands on that is to join the military.

Yes but that means they work at it, it's their soft and they would probably be able to sell it later on commercial market just like it happened with Warthog.

Posted (edited)

And we all fly F-16 and A10 vs Ka-50 that will be a lot of fun, I smell Falcon attitude where multiplayer occurs in coop missions against stupid AIs.

Witch suits pilots that like to dream that their skills and machine is on top of the world :)

 

I realy wish and I assume Im not the only one that wishes there will be something else to fly then just American made fixed-wing aircrafts.

 

I know its not the right thread to express this in, I felt I had to just let it out. Im Worried that ED will introduce F-16/F-18 armed whit Aim-120s.

While our American friends introduce Mig-29A whit ER-27. That would be so much fun and so much ego involved that it would be funny.

Edited by Teknetinium

Teknetinium 2017.jpg
                        51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
 

Posted

Can we stop talking about the old news already? Thanks for an unnecessary and childishly off-topic post about this airplane vs that airplane. Get over it! If there's nothing more to be said about the F-16 model, why say anything...

Posted
And we all fly F-16 and A10 vs Ka-50 that will be a lot of fun, I smell Falcon attitude where multiplayer occurs in coop missions against stupid AIs.

Witch suits pilots that like to dream that their skills and machine is on top of the world :)

 

I realy wish and I assume Im not the only one that wishes there will be something else to fly then just American made fixed-wing aircrafts.

 

I know its not the right thread to express this in, I felt I had to just let it out. Im Worried that ED will introduce F-16/F-18 armed whit Aim-120s.

While our American friends introduce Mig-29A whit ER-27. That would be so much fun and so much ego involved that it would be funny.

 

Yeah, off topic, but better 1 fighter soon then wait for 2 dissimilar fighters for twice as long. The wait for a DCS Fighter will be a long one as it is. I have been in many fights with human players flying the same aircraft as me. I don't see the big deal, but yes, dissimilar combat will make it more interesting to a degree.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...