Dethmagnetic Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 Sorry if this has been asked already, I checked Google and the forum search and didn't see any obvious hits. Is taxiing supposed to be this difficult? Even with stick full backwards or full forwards I feel like I have almost no authority. I've ended up just using differential brakes to steer, but I know that's not exactly recommended practice. Is there a NWS (TWS I guess) switch or anything I'm missing in my startup checklist? I guess I wasn't expecting puttering around on the ground to be the second most difficult part of this game (after the godlike fighter AI - which brings up another question, is that going to be tunable, or am I doomed to be pwned over and over again by the PC?) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] My rig: i7 3770K oc'd to 4.7 GHz | Asus Maximus 5 Extreme mobo | 4 x 8 GB Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR3 | 2 x EVGA GTX 680 in SLI | Asus Xonar Phoebus audio card | OCZ Vertex 4 512 GB SSD My peripherals: Dell U3011 30" at 2560x1600 | TM HOTAS Warthog | Saitek Combat Pedals | TrackIR 5 | Logitech G13 | Sennheiser HD 558 | Razer Black Widow | Razer Imperator
SmokeyTheLung Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 I've ended up just using differential brakes to steer I'm no expert here, but as far as I'm concerned this is key with the mustang. Also knowing when to push the stick forward and let the tailwheel caster. With a lot of practice it starts to get more comfortable... in the same way that walking on hot coals or lying on a bed of nails would :P System specifications: Computer, joystick, DCS world, Beer
Echo38 Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 Try quick bursts of high power as you're giving full rudder--you don't want to be charging around the taxiway at high throttle settings too often, but you do want to throttle up briefly for a turn, to provide more rudder authority.
WildBillKelsoe Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 your friend is differential braking while sticking stick to your gut. on takeoff though, don't hold stick too much back to gut, or risk a topple short of takeoff, specially with standard recommended rudder trim setting. AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
VH-Rock Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 I've never understood the difficulty in taxiing this aircraft, although I've flown props in different sims for a long time, so maybe I'm just used to it. If you unlock your tail wheel, Apply Rudder and power to initiate the turn, you can use the differential brakes (in the opposite direction) to stop the aircraft spinning. It's very smooth and easy to taxi using this method, especially if you have toe brakes set up... Virtual Horsemen - Right Wing (P-51) - 2008... Virtual Ultimate Fighters - Lead (P-47) - 2020...
Slayer Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 It's because RL pilots saying it is improper to use and "wear out" the brakes. Supposedly we should be able to taxi this without so much as touching the brakes at all. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] System Specs Intel I7-3930K, Asrock EXTREME9, EVGA TITAN, Mushkin Chronos SSD, 16GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z series 2133, TM Warthog and MFD's, Saitek Proflight Combat pedals, TrackIR 5 + TrackClip PRO, Windows 7 x64, 3-Asus VS2248H-P monitors, Thermaltake Level 10 GT, Obutto cockpit
Slayer Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 So, to the OP it's not really a stupid noob question. A taildragger is a whole different ballgame than a jet with NWS...it's a pretty valid question that some of us can learn from. The pilots book from a real P-51 states "In ordinary Taxi, keep the stick in neutral or slightly aft position, this locks the tailwheel and makes it steerable 6 degrees right or left with the rudder. To make sharp turns or go around corners, unlock the tailwheel by pushing the stick full forward" Nothing is said at all regarding braking. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] System Specs Intel I7-3930K, Asrock EXTREME9, EVGA TITAN, Mushkin Chronos SSD, 16GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z series 2133, TM Warthog and MFD's, Saitek Proflight Combat pedals, TrackIR 5 + TrackClip PRO, Windows 7 x64, 3-Asus VS2248H-P monitors, Thermaltake Level 10 GT, Obutto cockpit
cichlidfan Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 The pilots book from a real P-51 states "In ordinary Taxi, keep the stick in neutral or slightly aft position, this locks the tailwheel and makes it steerable 6 degrees right or left with the rudder. To make sharp turns or go around corners, unlock the tailwheel by pushing the stick full forward" Nothing is said at all regarding braking. Having read through that same manual I could not help noticing that a great many details are either glossed over or not mentioned at all. It seems, also based on pilot accounts of the era, that a great deal of the required knowledge was passed from mouth to ear in the classroom and on the flight line. The manual was more of a general reference. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:
Echo38 Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 (edited) And, at least in the case of the P-38 manual, there were quite a few rather large errors--some of them so horribly wrong that Lockheed test pilots had to fly around Europe, going from base to base to personally correct the misimpressions caused by the USAAF's often-bogus manual. : / Perhaps the best example of this was when Tony Levier performed aerobatics in the European theater with only one engine running, to disprove the rampant rumors that the '38 was a death ship in the event of engine loss; the rumor was ultimately the fault of the manual, which wrongly stated that rolls were impossible with one engine, and warned pilots against even turning in the direction of the dead engine. Tony's low-altitude spins and his barrel rolls into the dead engine disproved this and other rumors, and, in doing so, he did a lot to increase morale and pilot confidence in this much-falsely-maligned airplane. I don't know if the P-51 manual had as many errors as the P-38 manual, but if the P-51 manual was written by the USAAF instead of by North American Aviation, I would expect it to have a large number as well. Edited September 4, 2012 by Echo38
cichlidfan Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 You may well be right but this is more an issue of omission rather than inclusion of eroneos data. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:
Echo38 Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 You may well be right but this is more an issue of omission rather than inclusion of eroneos data. Aye, that was a general rant which was sparked by remembrance other USAAF flight manual info which was missing or faulty. The bit quoted by Slayer sounds right to me, for tailwheel taxiing, but, in general, the USAAF manuals should be taken with a slight grain of salt. I'm not saying to chuck 'em out altogether, because the majority of info in them is good, but it's better far to also use other, more reliable sources in conjunction with the official flight manuals.
mmaruda Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 Taxing is about as easy as IL-2 in the Mustang... Once you stop listening to all the handbook this, handbook that jabber. Just bind separate wheel brakes and use rudder in combination with the appropriate wheel brake. Go slow, keep your stick neutral or pulled back and for the love of everything holy DO NOT UNLOCK THE TAIL WHEEL.
159th_Viper Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 ......and for the love of everything holy DO NOT UNLOCK THE TAIL WHEEL. :megalol: It's true what you say: With the tailwheel locked, you have 6 degrees left and right and that gets you around most 90-degree corners comfortably, even without resorting to differential braking to assist. If you have to pop doughnuts to impress the lassies on the flight-line then unlock - with practice it becomes second nature, but again, can be done without. Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
MadTommy Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 To make sharp turns or to go around corners, unlock the tail wheel by pushing the stick full forward. In this position the tail wheel is full swiveling. Be careful not to start a sharp turn before unlocking the tail wheel – it tends to bind. Manual - P128 Ok i'm having issues. If i have to unlock the wheel, which according to Viper should not be often, (which in my P51 newbie state i'm having to do too often), I'm getting stuck. I unlock to make a sharp turn... starts off ok, but them when i want to relock the wheel I'm unable to. I simply can't get the wheel within the 6 degree restriction again, and end up going around in concentric circles. I attempt to straighten the wheel and then lock by pushing the stick forward. I am hearing a 'click' noise when i attempt this. Once i unlock and start a tight turn i effectively can then only turn in that direction. :doh: i5-3570K @ 4.5 Ghz, Asus P8Z77-V, 8 GB DDR3, 1.5GB GTX 480 (EVGA, superclocked), SSD, 2 x 1680x1050, x-fi extreme music. TM Warthog, Saitek combat pro pedals, TrackIR 4
WildBillKelsoe Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Manual - P128 Ok i'm having issues. If i have to unlock the wheel, which according to Viper should not be often, (which in my P51 newbie state i'm having to do too often), I'm getting stuck. I unlock to make a sharp turn... starts off ok, but them when i want to relock the wheel I'm unable to. I simply can't get the wheel within the 6 degree restriction again, and end up going around in concentric circles. I attempt to straighten the wheel and then lock by pushing the stick forward. I am hearing a 'click' noise when i attempt this. Once i unlock and start a tight turn i effectively can then only turn in that direction. :doh: Mate, you unlock forward and immediately control turn with differential braking. this is the trick. nothing fancy.once your nose starts to spin too much, that means you're not braking effectively. for more info, watch the glory warbirds vid @ start, and see how the instructor taxiis. AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
MadTommy Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Mate, you unlock forward and immediately control turn with differential braking. this is the trick. nothing fancy.once your nose starts to spin too much, that means you're not braking effectively. for more info, watch the glory warbirds vid @ start, and see how the instructor taxiis. Thanks, I'm not breaking at all, as i thought you used rudder to steer the tail wheel, and used breaks as little as possible. (according to the training & manual) I don't have pedals or the keys for individual wheel breaks assigned.... I'll need to sort this out and try again. Thanks for your help. :thumbup: i5-3570K @ 4.5 Ghz, Asus P8Z77-V, 8 GB DDR3, 1.5GB GTX 480 (EVGA, superclocked), SSD, 2 x 1680x1050, x-fi extreme music. TM Warthog, Saitek combat pro pedals, TrackIR 4
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted October 10, 2012 ED Team Posted October 10, 2012 And, at least in the case of the P-38 manual, there were quite a few rather large errors--some of them so horribly wrong that Lockheed test pilots had to fly around Europe, going from base to base to personally correct the misimpressions caused by the USAAF's often-bogus manual. : / Perhaps the best example of this was when Tony Levier performed aerobatics in the European theater with only one engine running, to disprove the rampant rumors that the '38 was a death ship in the event of engine loss; the rumor was ultimately the fault of the manual, which wrongly stated that rolls were impossible with one engine, and warned pilots against even turning in the direction of the dead engine. Tony's low-altitude spins and his barrel rolls into the dead engine disproved this and other rumors, and, in doing so, he did a lot to increase morale and pilot confidence in this much-falsely-maligned airplane. I don't know if the P-51 manual had as many errors as the P-38 manual, but if the P-51 manual was written by the USAAF instead of by North American Aviation, I would expect it to have a large number as well. I know at least one general mistake in the P-51 manual - 15:1 glide rate with dead engine. 15 is a maximal L/D ratio but in the powered flight or if the prop is removed. Real glide ratio vary from 10:1 to 7:1 regarding prop rpm and can be even less if the prop stopped at low pitch. Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
MudRat02 Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Pedal the bike, stir the pot, and bash the throttle ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Echo38 Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 I know at least one general mistake in the P-51 manual - 15:1 glide rate with dead engine. 15 is a maximal L/D ratio but in the powered flight or if the prop is removed. Real glide ratio vary from 10:1 to 7:1 regarding prop rpm and can be even less if the prop stopped at low pitch. This is very interesting--I've often heard the 15:1 figure as well, and never knew that it didn't apply even when the propeller lever was fully back. So, with prop lever all the way back, you'll still only get ~10:1?
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted October 12, 2012 ED Team Posted October 12, 2012 This is very interesting--I've often heard the 15:1 figure as well, and never knew that it didn't apply even when the propeller lever was fully back. So, with prop lever all the way back, you'll still only get ~10:1? Right. Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
Krebs20 Posted October 12, 2012 Posted October 12, 2012 Too bad the mustang cannot feather its propeller all the way. It would glide a little better. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts