All Activity

?? As already stated, the Huey and Hip are very widely used transport helicopters, the Chinook is in ELS and we do have the free mod for the UH60. Like any aircraft type in DCS, I'm sure that we'd all like more, but that takes time. We do also have the script mods for both CTLD and CSAR. I personally embed them into ALL of my missions with helicopters in them. Could they be better? Yes, absolutely. The CSAR mod requires a shot down pilot (which can also be scripted), but wouldn't it be nice if we could spawn a downed airman without needing to shoot something down. Additionally, CSAR cannot be conducted over water, as pilots ejecting over water simply drown. I'd love to see them using life vests, life rafts and having homing beacons. For WW2 scenarios, I'd like to be able to direct rescue boats for downed pilots. So yes, CSAR can be improved, but for me, I see the key "opportunities" existing with the logic of how to conduct CSAR.

I understand, but we can not talk about specifics of different contracts. If that changes in the future we will let you know.

It only affects the resolution of the monitor. My understanding is that reducing the resolution has such minimal benefits that it's not even recommended.

Have you tried putting in setting for the AI aircraft of "afterburners" - disable? If not, give it a go. Apparently, the AI Warbird pilots can and will happily use WEP, and don't have the same time limits that we as pilots do. The "afterburners" setting, when disabled with a warbird, now prevents AI using WEP all the time.

I buy everything off Steam and always get the discounts. It's just that often they only kick in for a short time, maybe a week or so IIRC, and right at release.

Then why is possible to have an oficial statement about the new file sharing policy that ALL 3rd parties should sign but we cant know who signed? Then we know Razbam is not inside the program just because the "issue" arose, not because ED shared that info to have customers informed. For me that not make sense

I was wondering have you compared the radar ranges given in soviet, german and yugoslav manual as well as number of radar modes?

Its frustrating for you and us for sure. But until there is a resolution all we can do is wait. thanks

Sorry to hear that, but please understand we can not list this currently, as mentioned above there are confidentiality considerations. I hope in the future you will have confidence in us again. I wish you all the best.

I was angry seeing an AI P47 climbing like an UFO in front of my Corsair's nose.

Hi, Not sure if it’s a bug or user fault. Above a certain altitude 8/9.000ft i get engine fail 2. When going below i can start it back up in the air. I also did cold start above certain altitude were engine 2 fails. Known? Anyone else?

ED is responsible. Period. "Be patient" is not a customer service strategy. It just isn't. May be time to move on to something else. I've been burned by every issue, including the Hawk. Time to park entertainment dollars elsewhere.

It seems impossible to get a simple list of 3rd parties inside the file sharing policy since 2018. Something so simple, no contractual reveals, just Developer X-Y-Z have signed the file sharing. Developer A-B-C didnt. So because It seems impossible for ED to list that, for me is impossible to buy anything else.

Shay in DCS.flv

I hope once this is all over we can share more with you. What you are suggesting about making things clearer about third party products has already been discussed internally. But of course as mentioned there are confidentially agreements that need to be considered, maybe in the future we can add some more clarity. Thank you

this is not an easy one to reproduce, but the team are still working on it. thanks

Of course, and I hope to be there for the next 16 years... I think you've misunderstood my point: Without a clear consumer policy for third-party products, ED ensures that we only purchase modules endorsed by ED...

But it has not stopped working, we have ensured the modules work as is with DCS 2.9 for over a year already. Please ensure you have read our EULA that you agreed to when making your purchase. Again all we can do is wait until there is a resolution to the dispute. thank you

Front panel "Pedal Dampener" switch is still missing. ty

Bear in mind your IRST range will be in the ballpark of 10 km now unless you're looking at an afterburner from behind since it's a R-60 seeker with extra steps IRL. They had to make a dogfight sensor with big FOV and working in any position in space. Time to say goodbye to IRST DCSisms. For real world stealth tactic you need support from your C&C.

Да хватит ему размеров карт. У него крейсер то в два раза медленнее большинства самолетов. От 164 до 272 узлов в зависимости от полезной нагрузки и высоты. Скорость сваливания не превышает 185 узлов в наихудших условиях (максимальный вес, крен 60, потеря тяги всех двигателей). Сопоставимо с A-10C. цифиры взяты от C-130T

I am waiting on my PCL being delivered and am researching setup information. Question I have is what does the DCS monitor resolution setting do as it has no effect (I don't think but stand to be corrected) on the headset. If it is only for the monitor surely setting it very low would reduce load on GPU? Thanks in advance.

Appreciate the prompt reply Newy, not asking for a copy of the contracts you have with your business partners or third parties. I'm not asking for details of whatever is still going on with RAZBAM specifically. I'm asking for a description of the mechanism that protects customers from third party developers. I can't speak for other users but at least for the country I live in, my protections are provided by an Act of Parliament. In this case "if a purchased online service stops working, you have rights under the consumer guarantees act to seek a remedy, such as a repair, replacement, or refund". Rights under the act can't be negated by terms of service and if a company is trading here, they must comply with the law. Now I'm not suggesting I'd go chasing an overseas company using this act as I suspect it'd be pointless. What I am saying is I think it's fair for customers to expect compensation should the RAZBAM modules be unable to be brought along with the core of DCS as development continues.

Thank you.

I rarely read ToS start to end (I doubt many people do). I will occasionally read the privacy stuff and choose not to use a service because of it but that's quite rare. My attitude is a company can write whatever they want in the ToS but ultimately if you irritate your customers en masse then ToS or no, they won't be in business very long.