All Activity

Hi, your track seems to end quickly and does not show the issue, can you try and reproduce another. When we test all seems ok, ensure you are in CCRP or LADD and not CCIP. thank you

No, you misunderstood what I meant. What I mean is: When QVFR is turned on, the picture in VR becomes blurrier than when it's off, and this isn't an isolated case. As for DLSS, I've always had a positive attitude towards it. Apart from some motion blur, it hasn't brought me any negative changes. I use a Quest 3. When I was using the 4060Ti 16G, QVFR worked really well. This problem only started to occur some time after I upgraded to the 5070Ti.

Formatting update: Most VR content has moved to https://www.8492sqdn.net/guides/vr/ so that it can be reused for other sims (Falcon, etc.) - there are links back and forth between the DCS page and the VR page where appropriate.

Probably because, once again, legal counsel has told them to keep quiet. Also, if IP infringement weren't involved, this would've been over long ago.

if is that so, then a clarification is indeed needed. Is easy to resolve: "Those 3rd party listed here have signed the file sharing program with us:" " Those modules listed here are included in the file sharing program" They can just add " Everything is subject to change" if they feel more confortable. But at least is something we as customers can ask for informed payment decisions within ED Store. Knowing nothing is granted in the mid-long future. But at least we all can know ED have those files from those developers if the worst case scenario someone are not able to keep developing the modules.

My computer has two M.2 drives, and I’ve tried reinstalling (the program) on both, but neither worked well… The problem isn’t here. I recently tried disabling core parking, which did bring noticeable improvements. However, there are still occasional intermittent freezes, and a new issue has cropped up: occasional frame drops when moving the mouse. This can be fixed by restarting the game. (Forums point out that this issue stems from mouse polling rate, but I never had this problem before when using a 1000Hz polling rate.)

I don't get it. We've got one side saying it's completely over, giving heads up on the situation throughout the conflict and giving a full on explanation to most important details of the agreements both past and the most recent one mentioned yesterday, being open to community questions and literally showing receipts for being ready to cooperate instantly and share the updates and escrow. The other side is hiding behind supposed confidentiality, dodging every single in-depth question and even deleting their own statements from social media, sharing messages that contradict each other and dropping their main claim which I don't think anyone believe by now with all that IP infringement trouble.

It technically isnt incorrect, its just very misleading. It absolutely should be made explicitly clear though as there is no such thing as too honest.

Thanks for letting me know! I will try the slow repair. Not sure how to do that but will search on here to see if there are instructions! Thanks and will report back!

Why is so hard to understand? Right now there is an official statement: "To avoid such issues in the future all 3d party are now required to make the game files available in case they are no longer able to support their product" It seems "incorrect" as far as i know today. So i want a CLARIFICATION from ED for this official statement about what 3rd party products are under that files sharing contract and what products are not Im not asking about what could happen in the next 20 years, or any future guarantee for life. i want to know as we know what 3rd parties are in the ED miles program and what developers are not, what 3rd parties have signed that file sharing and what modules are involved within. No so hard to provide from ED as we are costumers after all.

Thanks for replying TMS down dose indeed work to bring the Maverick back on track. This step wasn't needed with the previous TGP and now seems to be an extra step that needs to be taken before shooting a maverick unless flying straight and level. Comparing the behaviour of the Maverick when the weapon page is SOI in both tracks shows the difference between both TGP's clearly. I guess what I'm really asking is if this is set up this way as intended or a bug with the new TGP?

next time tell us that 1 second before patch, thanks.

I'm also wanting to know who Killed Jeffrey Epstien, but I'm not likely to have that information disclosed to me. There's no such thing as a safe module, or any other software, nobody can guarantee this, nothing even in life is guaranteed, except death and taxes, not even the mighty Bill Gates, with his windows upgrades... expectations v's reality can be brutal.

Yes, according to performance table. null

^100%

That's what I assume the case may be for the F-15E and Mirage, maybe the AV-8, but I have my doubts about that being the case with the MiG-19. Still, in such case, that's cold comfort because that means *A LOT* of modules can be boned.

Ok, so you don't have injection on. That's a separate key press. So you're maxing out and Military power, not WEP.

It is if there's a confidentiality clause in place. I hope you're also holding Razbam to the same standards with regards to accountability and as to why they decided to break the agreement, and the confidentiality clause associated with it?

Don't know. Did not turn on anything. Just set throttle to max

Then i want ED managers to rephrase that stament and specifically STATE what 3rd parties signed the files sharing and what developers didnt. Even just a list of "SAFE" modules covered with the files sharing could be enough for me. I just want to make informed decisions about my future on ED shop. I think is fair enough to know that in advance of any payment, dont you think? I dont care anymore about ED-RB issue, its over, i´ve admited im loosing all my RB modules when DCS pass 2.9 version. I want to know what content in DCS is protected in the future by the file sharing and what content is not. Because until yesterday the base common knowledge about this was "To avoid such issues in the future all 3d party are now required to make the game files available in case they are no longer able to support their product" ALL 3rd Party. NO exceptions mentioned, no modules mentioned. It says 3rd parties. ALL OF THEM

Hi, As stated, when entering air to ground mode with ATP functional, the air to ground FCR would not work. I could not choose scan mode including 'GMT' because those options are completely disapeared. in the track file I did the issue recording and I think it broke the FCR AA mode as well. It could have something to do with the 'overide' mechanism in ATP. Please take a look at this and correct me if I misunderstand something. Many thanks! LastMissionTrack.trk

For me at least, I'm not getting anywhere near 59 inches of manifold pressure.

What makes you think this hasn't happened? Razbam products were more than likely before this course of action took effect. What makes you think that this isn't one of the reasons the agreement that was supposed to have been put in place end of 2024, and Razbam have said get lost? I'm more inclined to think that most of the Razbam modules were contracted prior to the sharing of game files came into effect.

With the last dcs update (of course...) the new cockpit texture folder got overwritten, so ive now made a copy in saved games path. Yet to test it but fingers crossed it wont get overwritten again with the next update. [edit]ok did not work, but worth a try! As reported earlier the cockpit texture files only seem to be read when they are in the main dcs directory path, but at least I have a copy here to transplant back over when the next update wipes them again

You aren't alone there, at least.