All Activity

Ah, das ist natürlich super, wenn das so klappt! Ich kenn eher "Drück mal CTRL + SHF + ESC" und dann kommt "Ja das geht jetzt nicht, ich hab ja die Brille auf" und ich denke mir, jede Tastatur die ich jemals unter den Fingern hatte, hat diese Tasten an der gleichen Stelle (na gut, bis auf so völlig irrwitzige Notebook-Tastaturen, die ihre FN-Sondertaste da hinbauen, wo CTRL hingehört... ), kann doch nicht so schwer zu finden sein?! Da sind die Erfahrungen wohl etwas unterschiedlich. Ich denke das wird eine Mischung aus Verkehrsfliegerei, heads down die Route in der CNI-MU programmieren, das Flugzeug sein Ding machen lassen auf der einen Seite - und Tiefflug, Bedrohungen ausweichen, in einer umkämpften Zone Soldaten oder Fracht abliefern, ggf. Außenlandungen auf unbefestigten Plätzen, und sich freuen dass man hunderte Flares und Chaffs verfügbar hat auf der anderen Seite. Das Modul wird großartig.

It's not practical, safe or SOP to launch from the ramp super heavy but it is totally possible, esp. with the WOD help.

The point here is that it can happen with perfect frametimes. The animation errors won't necessarily show up on a frametime graph at all, they will just show visually. Because they aren't frametime stutters.

Fair point!

it could be, that yout stepper is not able to rotate the full 360°. Take a look at the following video:

And here I thought you were an advocate for things that doesn't make sense! Easiest module to AAR though!

Please post a screenshot of your message history, not the mission log.

Anyone have idea if the APG-71 was less vulnerable to jamming by the Tu-16 EW?

Thank you very much speed

If they have enough data about the flight model: there must be a reason why Su-25 is the only FC3 bird without PFM It would be an instant buy from me if they make it FF, obviously!

Su-33 doesn’t make a lot of sense though: you won’t be able to take off with more than 50% fuel and 2 (or 4 at most) AA missiles.

Thanks! Now, who wouldn't want a carrier based Redfor? Need SC version of the Kuznetsov then. [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Yes, they share a lot of the Su-27 avionics/systems/weapons.

Full fidelity? Don't think they would give that away for free, and I have a feeling they are working on one already, or making a decision based on the Fulcrum sales. Cheers!

Understood, he can DM me directly if he wishes. thank you

It needs some more tweaking for sure. thanks

Highly disagree! If they go for an Su-27, we probably won't see it for years, and the majority of the Fulcrum sales will be done, and I guess those that already have the Fulcrum will even get the Su-27. Actually, if one is into Redfor, one will get anything and everything Redfor. I do however want an FF Su-25 more that said. Question for more knowledgeable people than me. Could a development of the Su-27 speed up development of J-11 and Su-33? I'm speaking primarily of systems, not graphics and flight model. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Oh man ... lange hin und her überlegt, ob das Teil noch in meinen Stall passt. Ich glaube ich bin einfach nicht so der "Knöpfe drücken und Autopilot Flieger". Vielleicht lasse ich es dieses mal "ungekauft". Beim Msfs kann ich auch nur die Helis und die Buschflieger anfassen. Die großen Teile habe keinen Reitz auf mich. Mal sehen, wenn dann die ganzen Videos kommen, wenn es raus ist.... vielleicht ja doch

What is the reason given the new Su-25 isn't full-fat?

Yes I have noticed this also and thank you BIGNEWY for the response and the team finding the time when they can to address this. When it works it's awesome and makes playing DCS even more enjoyable.

Minor detail. Like mentioned, you can rename to whatever you want, except with prohibited characters like colon, semi colon and slashes, ( : ; / \ ). They can't be used in file and folder names. A period, like you wrote is fine. [emoji6] Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

@AlphaDecay stubbled across this as I am trying to find a sketch for my VSI I currently have a simple one, but not working the best I wouldn't be using the sensor as my stepper has end stops are you able to help me with what I need to remove from your sketch so I don't have the sensor part in there?

hello BN, OP does not want to attach dcs.log because it contains too much "personal information...."

sarebbe , almeno per il mercato italiano un bell'oggetto, sarebbe opportuno avere un Macchi 205 o G55 (perché tanto avrai a che fare con P51D, Spit IX, FW190D e Me109K) ma conoscendo il proverbiale autolesionismo magari qualcuno propenderà per un bel CR42

I managed to found the following sketch from an Arduino forum and i changed it a little to suit the FA18 vsi gauge the gauge moves and works, but it doesn't travel the full range as in the 315 deg it does up, but doesn't down can anyone tell me what i need to change to get it to travel the full 315 deg or further down. Sorry this is all new to me and trying to understand these sketches. #define DCSBIOS_IRQ_SERIAL //#define DCSBIOS_RS485_SLAVE 34 //#define TXENABLE_PIN 2 #include "DcsBios.h" #include "SwitecX25.h" // 315 degrees of range = 315x3 steps = 945 steps int newValue; unsigned int maxSteps = 945; unsigned int targetStep = -945; unsigned int currentStep; // declare motor1 with 945 steps on pins 8-11 //SwitecX25 motor1(maxSteps, 9, 8, 10, 11); SwitecX25 motor1(maxSteps, 5, 4, 6, 7); void setup(void) { DcsBios::setup(); motor1.zero(); // this is a slow, blocking operation motor1.setPosition(targetStep); motor1.update(); } void onVsiChange(unsigned int newValue) { unsigned int position = map(newValue, 0, 65535, 0, maxSteps); motor1.setPosition(position); } DcsBios::IntegerBuffer vsiBuffer(0x7500, 0xffff, 0, onVsiChange); void loop(void) { motor1.update(); DcsBios::loop(); }